Active Topics |  Search

Login or Register
All Forums > Windsurfing > General > New 2012 Naish Chopper wave sail
Author New 2012 Naish Chopper wave sail
Page: of 3
NSW
376 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 9:21 am        Report Show Profile
Interesting to see a comparison with the Severne Swats - which are at such a good price point... and 4 battens/compact shaping.
NSW
437 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 10:14 am        Report Show Profile
What I find interesting is that Naish's claim that "Since you will be using a smaller size sail and shorter mast" tells me that they are returning to the power delivery of sails from pre-flat top days without the height? Lots of power down low, which suits my heavier weight, for instant speed but I guess a trade-off in less top speed? It's designed for waves afterall and ideal for freestyle too me thinks so top speed is not a priority. If they have eliminated the upper twist off area from the norm and moved it down and out they must have done some serious shaping to the lower part of the sail to reduce pull from the top of the sail where they moved the sail area to. I'd love to try one out in the XL size.
14 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 11:14 am        Report Show Profile
Hi All! Wind Warrior and AUS301 are bang on. I have actually had a chance to use the Chopper sail here on Maui and it is truly amazing. The "M" is equivalent to a 4.7 with increased top end range and same goes for the other sizes. The control you gain with these sails, less swing weight without sacrificing power and early planing is unmatched. FR
WA
10388 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 1:42 pm        Report Show Profile
I fail to see how you can get more top end with a softer sail - less skin tension due to softer (shorter) masts and less battens for support. Maybe I am missing something but a Fly, Swat or this thing will all be softer feeling than the same manufacturer's 5 batten wave sail. FR, you are talking about early planing which means grunty down low, so how Naish can also claim much-increased top end is beyond me.
WA
359 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 1:58 pm        Report Show Profile
Mark _australia said...
I fail to see how you can get more top end with a softer sail - less skin tension due to softer (shorter) masts and less battens for support. Maybe I am missing something but a Fly, Swat or this thing will all be softer feeling than the same manufacturer's 5 batten wave sail.
I agree, I'd like to try one and see for myself, I have nothing against Naish sails, my most favourite sail was a 2008 5.3 Naish Force
QLD
8801 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 2:54 pm        Report Show Profile
what were your thoughts on the north hero and the severne swat
FR said...
Hi All! Wind Warrior and AUS301 are bang on. I have actually had a chance to use the Chopper sail here on Maui and it is truly amazing. The "M" is equivalent to a 4.7 with increased top end range and same goes for the other sizes. The control you gain with these sails, less swing weight without sacrificing power and early planing is unmatched. FR
NSW
1285 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 3:53 pm        Report Show Profile
Mark _australia said...
I fail to see how you can get more top end with a softer sail - less skin tension due to softer (shorter) masts and less battens for support. Maybe I am missing something but a Fly, Swat or this thing will all be softer feeling than the same manufacturer's 5 batten wave sail. FR, you are talking about early planing which means grunty down low, so how Naish can also claim much-increased top end is beyond me.
If you watch the video RE the theory behind the sails the designer actually says "it's not the sail you take out in windy conditions for control" or something very similar to that. I would imagine the top end on this sail is pretty poor, simply due to its design. As the owner of both the SWAT ('11 and 12' models) and the S1('12) I can say that the S1 is a far more stable sail, particularly compared to the '11 SWATs which imo are a very soft sail with a very deep bottom end range; the '12 SWATs seem much closer to the S1's in terms of foil stability and have much more skin tension than the '11 models (from my observations). I would imagine this sail is quite similar to the '11 SWAT, although more compact; lots of low end grunt with a trade off in top end control.
New Zealand
14 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 4:38 pm        Report Show Profile
Sailworks have has similar explanation issues. Their Huckers, which have been around since at least 2005, are very grunty sails. 5.6 Hucker is like a 6.2 NP alpha in terms of power.
WA
10388 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 5:21 pm        Report Show Profile
CJW said...
Mark _australia said...
I fail to see how you can get more top end with a softer sail - less skin tension due to softer (shorter) masts and less battens for support. Maybe I am missing something but a Fly, Swat or this thing will all be softer feeling than the same manufacturer's 5 batten wave sail. FR, you are talking about early planing which means grunty down low, so how Naish can also claim much-increased top end is beyond me.
If you watch the video RE the theory behind the sails the designer actually says "it's not the sail you take out in windy conditions for control" or something very similar to that. I would imagine the top end on this sail is pretty poor, simply due to its design.
Yup. The typical manufacturer's claim of more bottom end and more top end that they repeat ad nauseum and it is borderline insulting - they think we are that dumb? We should have sails with a 40kn wind range if all their claimed annual improvements since 1988 are true........
NSW
2084 Posts
Posted 03/03/2012, 11:15 pm        Report Show Profile
nzloopy said...
Sailworks have has similar explanation issues. Their Huckers, which have been around since at least 2005, are very grunty sails. 5.6 Hucker is like a 6.2 NP alpha in terms of power.
well... and a 2012 Atlas 4.7 is like a 2009 5.4 Alpha. Don't get me wrong. The Huckers are good sails but the 6.2 never really made a lot to sense to me. The difference between the 6.2 and the 5.8 Alpha in my opinion is nill. Back to topic... I agree with Mark that I would like to see how it actually works. I was always sceptical of quad and twin boards but found that Thrusters seem to be a good compromise. Yet any of those boards in the right conditions out perform a single fin. I think the bottom line is the chopper is designed for a very specific market. Having seen a number of Hawaiian sailors at places like Gnaraloo I would say as a general rule of thumb a lot of them like to sail very underpowered.
NSW
1016 Posts
Posted 04/03/2012, 6:32 am        Report Show Profile
jermaldan said...
Looks nice, but this sizing thing is a dumb move.
There would go the only indisputable method of measuring wind strength that we have! What can we say? "It was an XXL.. sorry XXS day"
WA
84 Posts
Posted 06/03/2012, 11:16 am        Report Show Profile
for sure its aimed at lighter sailors.. it says that on the first line on the website.. but what the hell is wave..freestyle... 'kung fu'???? Eagle claw???
WA
979 Posts
Posted 06/03/2012, 5:36 pm        Report Show Profile
Troppo said...
Justin is saying that they are targeted towards heavier sailors having more grunt to get up and go. In response to windwarriors post.
84Kg?? Heavier sailors?? 84Kg sailors are lightweight kidz .
NSW
101 Posts
Posted 11/03/2012, 6:32 pm        Report Show Profile
I like the look of those choppers are they in aus yet ?
QLD
1900 Posts
Posted 12/03/2012, 5:02 pm        Report Show Profile
Must be something to it, would seem Maui Sails are now doing similar stuff with their new Mutant. http://www.mauisails.com/news.php?id=309
WA
1600 Posts
Posted 12/03/2012, 5:16 pm        Report Show Profile
albentley said...
but what the hell is wave..freestyle... 'kung fu'???? Eagle claw???
If they made a Naish 'Chuck Norris' no one could handle it.
WA
10388 Posts
Posted 12/03/2012, 5:53 pm        Report Show Profile
aus301 said...
Must be something to it, would seem Maui Sails are now doing similar stuff with their new Mutant. http://www.mauisails.com/news.php?id=309
Yeah but people also bought footy fins, canards, Z booms, chest harnesses, and god knows what else due to fashion, but we now know better I think these unstable sails for featherweights will go the same way
NSW
749 Posts
Posted 12/03/2012, 5:59 pm        Report Show Profile
Maybe this is 'Kung Fu' style....
QLD
1900 Posts
Posted 12/03/2012, 7:22 pm        Report Show Profile
Mark _australia said... Yeah but people also bought footy fins, canards, Z booms, chest harnesses, and god knows what else due to fashion, but we now know better I think these unstable sails for featherweights will go the same way
Hmmm, all the innovations you are talking about are quite old though Mark, I really think the R&D on gear these days is far greater and highly doubt you would see two companies go to market with something that didn't work. And there was nothing wrong with chest harnesses, I used one for years.
WA
10388 Posts
Posted 12/03/2012, 7:40 pm        Report Show Profile
^^^ sorry I disagree there are many things companies do just to keep up (notionally / market share) More recent? Look at Quads - all of a sudden every company had to have a quad, and the first year many were awful as they rushed them out to compete. Season 2, and they were all quite good. 2001 -2 somebody (NP?) did batwing leeches, all of a sudden next year everyone had them. They were not that good and we haven't seen one since. 2004 - metallic x-ply in all wavesails. Seen much lately? 2006-7 (?) - companies start sanding excess paint off boards to lighten them and show off the fact they really do have carbon fibre. Now we have black resin in glass boards to make them look the part. This is a tit for tat marketing thing with soft compact 4 batten wavesails. Maybe they are good, but they only suit a few people. For Naish to say it has bottom end grunt, and a 4.7 has the top end of a 4.2 is rubbish and I am all the more pessimistic given the copying and marketing hype we see all the time
3 Posts
Posted 13/03/2012, 8:27 pm        Report Show Profile
Hi guys. I'm a lightweight at 72 kg and I have a Naish boxer sl 7.0 2010 which rigs on 430 rdm. It is really compact compared to other sails and the 2012 is even more compact!Is that a problem??Works far better for me compared to other sails I had up to 8.5.Really like handling a much smaller sail and by far a lighter rig. Have never used a boxer but looking forward to hear comments on the chopper after someone tries it.I really think that when you are overpowered it is a lot easier to handle a smaller rig of the same sail size.Maybe thats what they mean for the top end conditions.
VIC
1009 Posts
Posted 13/03/2012, 9:31 pm        Report Show Profile
I'm a lightweight at xxx kg... blah blah...
umm... how about the 12yr old kid at 45 kg? What does he use? Sail sizes of S,M,L,etc is stupid -> it works for T-shirts as we dont change our body shape from day-to-day... the wind does. Lets go back to using "storm sails"... 'cause that worked so well.
3 Posts
Posted 13/03/2012, 10:27 pm        Report Show Profile
so mathew you are saying that someone at 85 kg should use the same gear as me?I think that for the same wind if I use M he should use L.We should go as you suggest just stay in the past and don't try something new
WA
10388 Posts
Posted 13/03/2012, 10:57 pm        Report Show Profile
f2sunset said...
so mathew you are saying that someone at 85 kg should use the same gear as me?I think that for the same wind if I use M he should use L.We should go as you suggest just stay in the past and don't try something new
I think what he is saying is where is the XXXS? or the XXXXL? Having 4 sizes for a whole range is dumb. I think the storm sail reference may be tongue in cheek And I still assert that you can't have awesome bottom end and top end, else we'd all have one. It is typical marketing spiel. Bit like how all the boards are faster AND looser AND easier to gybe etc etc, every.single.year for the last 20yrs. With 2 posts, you wouldn't be sponsored by Naish and have joined just for this thread, would you George?
WA
314 Posts
Posted 13/03/2012, 11:44 pm        Report Show Profile
So essentially what theyve done is gone wavesailors dont need this top floppy bit of the sail since they don't need a ridiculous top end speed so we'll cut it off? I can see them standing in the loft Loft boss:"Wow! that looks super! Sooooooo, how much exactly did you cut off each one?" Sailmaker:"Ummmmm S#%t" Loft boss: "Thats a carton! Alright, we'll call this one a small this one a medium...........
3 Posts
Posted 14/03/2012, 5:49 am        Report Show Profile
I wish I was payed to do that Mark:) You are correct about the low end and top end.Can't have it all although we are looking for more and more. I just want to say that from all the new concepts some will be ok otherwise the sport wouldn't evolve.Maybe its to good to be true for this line of sails:) Anyway which sail would you recommend in the 5.3-5.5 category to have the biggest wind range.Ezzy's?? Just looking to lower my quiver.Would love to have a 5.5 and a 4.5 than 4 sails from 5.7 to 4.2.
QLD
1900 Posts
Posted 14/03/2012, 9:27 am        Report Show Profile
Mark _australia said... I think what he is saying is where is the XXXS? or the XXXXL? Having 4 sizes for a whole range is dumb.
Sorry Mark, just picking up on this comment. I find it interesting that almost any discussion on how to get more people windsurfing seems to have as one of the top responses a need to simplify the sport. In this we are getting exactly what has been asked for by some parts of the market, maybe not all which may be where you sit. 4 sizes for a range of wave sails seems ok to me, I don't know many wave sailors that don't have a range looking something like 5.7, 5.3, 4.7, 4.2 etc or less depending on location - here in QLD we can drop the 4.2 for instance. So XL, L, M, S... I guess I don't get what the issue is. Finally a company is making it easy for consumers. Here are the sizes, they all rig on a single mast away you go. We then may see benefits through economies of scale for the manufacturer, less sizes from them means greater sale of individual sizes and lower production costs for a given size in the range, maybe, I don't assume to know the cost models behind sail production. I will re-iterate, as it seems to be on peoples minds... I don't sail for or own a Naish sail. I tried one once and hated it. But I do like some elements of the concept behind the chopper. I have started to see some glowing reviews, however they may be taken with a grain of salt as I assume only a selected few have had the opportunity of riding one, who may be the same people that stand to benefit from the sails success.
WA
10388 Posts
Posted 14/03/2012, 9:57 am        Report Show Profile
Simplifying - agreed All on one mast -agreed My only beef, and it is just observations as I don't care what Naish do... I have 5 sails 4.2 to 6.2 and use all of them - the 4.2 may only be 3 or 4 times a year in winter. In the Naish range what does my 55kg mate use? He uses his 3.2 and 3.7 sails a fair bit...... What does my 110kg mate use on the light days? His 6.2 is his most used wave sail. Even if you love the S - M - L concept a 5.3 is not XL !!! There's the mindset of companies producing gear for 70kg 20 year old professionals. And again - the claim of great bottom end yet a 4.7 has the top end of a 4.2. Crap.
WA
267 Posts
Posted 14/03/2012, 12:30 pm        Report Show Profile
Why all the grief Mark about Marketing. Surely you know not to read or believe any of the sales blurbs. It is another product to fill a niche like millions of other products out there. It is not a sail for everyone, it is another tool for those that want it. You can still get 5.7 forces or sessions or boxers. Here is a sail for wave riding on great waves for anyone who doesn't want a standard style sail. Mybe it is all gimmick but gimmicks do sell and some of them work. There are boards made for the same wave conditions - they are not for onshore days, not for lumpy surf but are awesome on clean waves. That doesn't mean everyone has to have one. I though twins and quads were a fad and now I have both and won't go back to a single fin as the multi fins offer me better riding. I thought 4 batten sails suck from my experience 10 years ago, but now love some of the newer models and would always want one handy. They are way more stable than I thought, more fun to use and light. And I am sailing with 95kg guys who like the same gear all-be-it in the next size up. It is all about choice - if you think it sucks don't try it. I agree there have been some very dodgy ideas bought to market but one mans turd is another mans gold. Just to keep the bigger guys happy, there is also some serious work being done on proper wave oreinted 6.2's and 6.7's by some companies for the bigger wave boards guys are now buying and lightest of wind, so it seems everyone is being catered for more easily nowadays.
VIC
1009 Posts
Posted 14/03/2012, 1:55 pm        Report Show Profile
Paul said...
Why all the grief Mark about Marketing. Surely you know not to read or believe any of the sales blurbs. It is another product to fill a niche like millions of other products out there.
Lying to customers (better bottom end, better top end) is.... lying.
It is not a sail for everyone, it is another tool for those that want it. You can still get 5.7 forces or sessions or boxers. Here is a sail for wave riding on great waves for anyone who doesn't want a standard style sail. Mybe it is all gimmick but gimmicks do sell and some of them work.
hogwash. A "gimmick" is by-definition... a a gimmick. Otherwise it wouldn't be. Mark interpreted my comment dead-on -> we already had a well defined strategy for users, which took into account wind strength and body weight. Naish have come up with a limited version of the same thing **. Here is an example of why "M" is a useless metric...: http://www.guycribb.com/userfiles/documents/HavingItLarge.pdf ** The quality of the sails themselves is not in question, just the marketing.
 
Page: of 3
All Forums > Windsurfing > General > New 2012 Naish Chopper wave sail
123 << PrevNext >> Last
^^^ Return to top of page ^^^