Simondo said...
I recently heard about the prospects of a new artificial reef near Torquay. First thoughts were why? The place is covered with natural reefs.
But with further reading, it appears that it does create extra habitats for fish, and greater fish numbers. I'm not even a fisherman, but I do like to eat fish... I figure it is just a variation on farming in the sea... Like adding fertilizers to the land, farming on land... This is actually a variation of sea farming... I like the concept...
At $1M, it's not that bad... More fish for ever! I've seen worse examples of dropping $1M. For example, I am working on about $1,000M worth of projects so the East Coast Crew can have gas at their houses in the future... In other gas fields... Long term... $50B+++ off shore in WA and similar for Qld on shore. The lucky country... Even though it has become expensive.
Well, your working on projects worth THAT much congrats, care to put an enviro spin on the fall out ?
Are you talking about the Gas expansion at Gladstone HARBOUR, or the coal seam gas rubbish in SE qld, care to have a look at the fallout/degredation of our waterways, etc from dredging the Gladstone harbour as a start, and . Diseased fish, loss of income for fisherman. Locals do not even bother to wet a line in the harbour because of the disgraceful state of the waterway from dredging of the harbour.