Climate change is horrible

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
nebbian
nebbian
WA
6277 posts
WA, 6277 posts
10 Apr 2008 2:34pm
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080408.wclimatebeer0408/BNStory/International/home

NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
10 Apr 2008 5:10pm
ARGGGH NOOOOoooo. Better drink myself to death now while I can afford it.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
10 Apr 2008 5:57pm
OH. MY. GOD.

Won't somebody, for ****'s sake, think about the children!? Won't somebody think about the children!!!
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
14 Apr 2008 8:12am
Price rises due to the costs of raw materials going up will be insignificant compared to the carbon taxes that will be placed on everything from farting to walking your dog.

The climate always changes and we may have global warming. However it is being used by all the scammers and rip off merchants to make us poorer and them richer. And the sad fact is it won't cool off the climate in the slightest.

This just sounds like an excuse to raise the price of beer.



555
555
892 posts
555 555
892 posts
14 Apr 2008 8:09am
My question is: How does taxing Carbon emissions actually do anything to decrease the emission of carbon?

The whole carbon credit trading thing is bollocks. Dirty companies buy credits off clean companies so that they can still emitt the same levels of carbon, and then pass on the cost to the consumer.

Who wins? Not the planet and not the consumer.. The only real winners are the clean companies, but at the end of the day, that's just more profit to them, from us. It doesn't actually help the planet at all.

Oh, and there are the guys who trade in carbon credits - brokers... they win too - take a small slice of the pie everytime it changes hands...

Where do carbon credits come from? They're invented by an organisation. If I take them a 100 Tonne block of carbon, will they give me some credits?
Pointman
Pointman
WA
437 posts
WA, 437 posts
15 Apr 2008 9:09pm
Carbon credits make alternative forms of energy generation (wind, solar, tidal) price-competitive with polluting fossil fuel energy sources which are comparatively cheap. I.e. when the carbon tax is added to the cost of producing energy with fossil fuels it ain't so cheap after all.

If Australia had an effective carbon trading scheme our best and brightest wouldn't be taking their world-beating alternative energy technology to more enlightened countries like Germany and China (China has one of the largest wind farms in the world).

Nah, let's just bag it out and keep burning coal.

dralyagmas
dralyagmas
SA
380 posts
SA, 380 posts
16 Apr 2008 12:37pm
Carbon trading worjks by setting a cap that is generally lower than the maximum current discharge (eg: Kyoto uses the 1990 CO2 emissions).

Large companies can buy credits but there needs to be credits available and that is where the work gets done.

Typically in regulated industries 20% of the cost of cleaning up emissions will take care of 80% of the emissions but the other 80% of money will be needed to do the last 20%. If the large companies can use that 80% of funds to clean up someone elses 80% that us a better outcome. Of course this is using the assumption that large coal companies are currently regulated to be at that 80% reduction level which I highly doubt.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Apr 2008 3:12pm
dralyagmas said...

...

Large companies can buy credits but there needs to be credits available and that is where the work gets done.

...



There's so much money to be made there it ain't funny.

Read: "The Bored Whore of Kyoto"

"The idea is similar to the one behind the trendy personal "carbon offset" industry, but transferred to the international level. Just as Brad Pitt and Al Gore can invest in some reforestation project in India and then declare themselves "carbon neutral" without changing their carbon-intensive lives, so too can France invest in Russia and claim Kyoto success without cutting its domestic CO2 output. Critics of personal offsets and Kyoto's credit scheme have compared them to the medieval Church practice of selling Indulgences to sinners. It's a good analogy. Kyoto's carbon-trading game allows signatory nations to think they're going to heaven while we continue slouching toward likely global warming hell."

Full article
(ignore the ads, exile actually do some really brilliant journalism. just don't print out a hard copy of the newpaper and leave it on the work printer for too long, like I have):
www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=8559&IBLOCK_ID=35&phrase_id=22981
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
17 Apr 2008 7:41am
Yeah,

If we really want to reduce carbon emissions, the best carbon trading scheme in the world isn't going to make a lick of difference. The only thing that will work is a huge economic depression where nobody has any money to buy anything. So no more cars on the road, no more factories making junk. You can't afford the power bill so the lights get turned off.

Plenty of people will be pissed off and many will die but it will reduce our emissions. Thats the way Russia met it Kyoto targets, through a massive contraction of their economy from Soviet times.

Whether this contraction would reduce global warming. Well thats another question which no one has the answer for. Perhaps we would go into an ice age which would make global warming a fairly tale to tell children before they go to sleep.



KiteDevil
KiteDevil
TAS
778 posts
TAS, 778 posts
20 Apr 2008 9:50pm
mmm beer.

pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
21 Apr 2008 4:31pm
Down at the windsurfing carpark a few weeks back I saw a new 4wd which had a sticker on it which said something like "This vehicle has balanced emissions."

I wondered what that meant but when I looked, it had an exhaust pipe on both sides, so I spose that's what it means.
big gill
big gill
WA
649 posts
WA, 649 posts
21 Apr 2008 4:59pm
its too late we are all stuffed may aswell enjoy it why we can
cwamit
cwamit
WA
1194 posts
WA, 1194 posts
21 Apr 2008 8:29pm
only one way to stop us screwing the environment and that is to stop fken breeding!!!!!!!!!!!!! [}:)], who wants three to four kids anyhow, for mother natures sake get a hobby!
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply