Does anyone give a s#@t about the environment?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Durks
Durks
WA
118 posts
WA, 118 posts
15 Feb 2009 9:54pm
Ok lets face it, global warming is real despite the occasional quack who disagrees with it because humans can do no wrong or won't kite too far past the last marker in case they fall off the side of the earth.

My question is; why don't people care? A tv poll not too long ago found that the majority of Australians were 'concerned' about it but few were prepared to give up even $1 a day to fix it.....Alright so floods, cyclones, firestorms and the end of life as we know it are bad....but I really want a plasma.

I know this is a taboo subject. Most only raise it in private or in muted conversations with friends sipping latte discussing the recent heat wave, but why?
Why should it be a dirty word; cos its not cool, sexy or may even give some the guilts?

In my line of work I see a lot of people that pay lip service to the environment, but when it comes to the crunch its someone elses responsibility. They don't want solar cos the government's only paying 75%, they don't want CFL's cos they're not pretty enough, and they're not gonna change their behaviour cos at the end of the day they just can't be arsed. Does any of this sound like you?

I give a s#@t! I don't wanna have to swim to the shops, or do simulated dives of the great barrier reef or have to think about all those people that are buggered as a result of Australias demand for creature comforts. Does anyone else, and if so what have you done to reduce your own impact?
newo
newo
WA
250 posts
WA, 250 posts
15 Feb 2009 10:07pm
I now only spit chewing gum out the car window.
I'm doing my part
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
15 Feb 2009 10:15pm
OK, I fess up.
Passive solar house, (no heating or airconditioning necessary)
gas boosted solar waterheater, (no electricity at all)
Turn off any electrical appliance/light not in use.
At a guess our quarterly electricity bill is about $60.00 for the 2 of us
A bottle of gas lasts a bit over a year.
mainly native garden, (minimum water use)
water bill $20.00 for 6 months
Corrola stationwagon, as main car, fits all our windsurfing stuff but only uses 7litres/100km, I've got an old bomb of a commodore for speed sailing, but that only does 10km a week on average.
recycle as much as possible, and if it still works OK, don't worry about updating to the latest in fashion stuff.
Don't buy newspapers, read the news online or tv.
cycle to the shops if the weather is OK.

We don't make any big sacrifices just try and keep waste to a minimum, and still have a comfortable life.
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:21am
i am trying not to fart as much...

but a swim to the shops sounds kinda appealing..

but to answer your question.... no, i don't care.

when a bought and paid for oil-man and his entourage conglomerate media (which also happens to be oil owned), tries to sell us a solution to a problem he and they sold us in the first place well, you know something is rotten in denmark ( pun intended )

are we responsible for the rest of the currently monitored solar systems seemingly exponential raise in temperature..?

what about the suns current raise in radiation during a period of supposed solar minimum...?

for me...,

climate change is very real

global warming, as its been sold to us, is a very different story..

what we are responsible for, is the greatest extinction of diversity of life on this planet probably in its entire billions upon billions of years. so much so that, when this change does happen, as its' happened before (documented) and will again (prophesied), there will be that much less of it to have a chance of starting again and that much less diversity next time around.

windykid
windykid
QLD
368 posts
QLD, 368 posts
15 Feb 2009 11:23pm
im being more environmental
ive stop dropping pianos on people
Durks
Durks
WA
118 posts
WA, 118 posts
15 Feb 2009 11:35pm
Doctor

2 reasons why Newtons law of gravity was so contentious at the time was because you couldn't see it (telescopes were too crap to pick up small deviations) and it confronted societies conception of mankind - that we were the centre of the universe.

The earths not flat buddy, its probably best to listen to those in the know because you in your infinite wisdom probably don't have all that good access to the sort of thingamajigees needed to prove them wrong. You've got a right to not give a s#@t, but theres really no need to reject it on scientific grounds. Watchin some doco from a dude ranting about sunspotsor some such stuff doesn't do anything to reject that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere traps heat...

On ya decrepit
SmellySkater
SmellySkater
110 posts
110 posts
15 Feb 2009 11:39pm
Yes I'm doing my bit by not contributing to any natural disasters. I'm not destructing any rain forests or the ozone layer, I'm not killing any species, also I'm not overcrowding any cities etc etc.
nebbian
nebbian
WA
6277 posts
WA, 6277 posts
15 Feb 2009 11:58pm
Durks said...

Doctor

2 reasons why Newtons law of gravity was so contentious at the time was because you couldn't see it (telescopes were too crap to pick up small deviations) and it confronted societies conception of mankind - that we were the centre of the universe.


Are you talking about Newton, Gallileo or Copernicus?
SmellySkater
SmellySkater
110 posts
110 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:22am
Then I think it was the astronomers Aristarchus and Hipparchus that discovered that the earth was not the centre of the universe.

Are you from the EPA or something Durks?
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23695 posts
WA, 23695 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:38am
Hey Durks,

First of all, please prove global warming to me? Seeing as though we don't have temp data for more than 100 years that is reliable.....I'm sure your 100% verifiable proof will be an interesting read.

Secondly, please prove that any variation seen is not natural cycling of atmospheric temps?




Oh and geez, why not... show me how it is more important than any one of the many natural phenomena, or even lack of oil, that may cause our demise in the next 200 years or so?

Just playing devil's advocate here....
hills
hills
SA
1622 posts
SA, 1622 posts
16 Feb 2009 7:58am
oooookay, well I'm not prepared to take the risk, so I don't need any more evidence. I think we've broken enough weather records in the last couple of years to convince me.

We pay extra to get 100% green electricity from our energy provider.

We have rain water plumbed to the house as we have to rely on the murray otherwise

We have a mostly native garden and only water the lawn with tank water. No reticulated water is ever used in the garden.

I've paid carbon credits for my car

and although it gets me flamed on the the lycra thread, I ride my bike to work. [}:)]
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
16 Feb 2009 8:55am
Yes global warming is real. No one denies it despite what you say Durks. If we didn't have any form of atmosphere, all of the sun's radiation hitting the earth would bounce right back into space, just like on the moon and the temperature would be about minus 180 degrees or something like that.

Whats your point? Few people would not care about the environment. People care about their needs and their wants. There are certain needs that people must have to survive. Above that there are wants that make life easier. There are very few people throughout the world who would not appreciate having electricity going into their home, fresh water on tap and having a reliable car to get around in.

Global warming is now an industry. We used to get communists and socialists who wanted to take over all the industry in the world. Now we get greenhouse people who want to destroy industry in the world. Its human nature to believe we are living in the most important time in earth history. That is not true.

Human induced global warming is a theory. There is evidence to suggest its happening. However I personally don't like the idea of people losing their jobs and having to pay heaps of taxes because of a theory. Last time that happened we got communism in the USSR and China. Communism is a theory too, apparently a scientific theory at that. So all those people got shot, starved, robbed and killed because of a theory.

All the current ideas sound like taxing the average joe for driving to work and using his fridge and transferring money out of his pocket to stick in the hands of wheelers, dealers and the government.

For the record, we moved a place close to my work and a train station. I walk to work and my wife walks to the train station and catches a train to work. So we rarely use our car. I rarely buy new things but unfortunately am a sucker for gadgets.

All the big talkers on global warming drive round in big luxury 4WDs, take trips across the world all the time and consume all the time.



elmo
elmo
WA
8895 posts
WA, 8895 posts
16 Feb 2009 7:28am
Beware the Aardvarks
cwamit
cwamit
WA
1194 posts
WA, 1194 posts
16 Feb 2009 7:57am
elmo said...

Beware the Aardvarks



the ill tempered ones you mean.
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:31pm
Durks said...

Doctor

2 reasons why Newtons law of gravity was so contentious at the time was because you couldn't see it (telescopes were too crap to pick up small deviations) and it confronted societies conception of mankind - that we were the centre of the universe.

The earths not flat buddy, its probably best to listen to those in the know because you in your infinite wisdom probably don't have all that good access to the sort of thingamajigees needed to prove them wrong. You've got a right to not give a s#@t, but theres really no need to reject it on scientific grounds. Watchin some doco from a dude ranting about sunspotsor some such stuff doesn't do anything to reject that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere traps heat...

On ya decrepit


........blah dity blah dity blah blah blah

'best to listen to those in the know'...?
that was my whole point 'buddy', who decides exactly whos' in the know...?
a member of the club of rome..? a jesuit and council of foreign relations member..?
given the past record of 'these people in the know', do you really believe they have the goiym/sheeple/useless eaters read :'general publics' best interests at heart...
or
could it possibly be, another of 'their' known tactics of fear based attention diversion. now because of 'global warming' they will be able to further roll out any measure of social control (just as they did/do with circus terrorist) or financial tax they deem nessesary to 'combat' global warming and we the now guilty will welcome it with open arms because... 'we been bad, we been real bad'.

funny how global warming seems to get real bad around december/january/february
in the southern hemisphere, and around june/july/august in the north
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Feb 2009 1:25pm
Your contribution:
.

China, India's etc:

............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................

You are not making a difference. This is not my attitude, I am stating a fact.
Richiefish
Richiefish
QLD
5612 posts
QLD, 5612 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:30pm
I took a sh1t in the environment ! More than once !!!!
Durks
Durks
WA
118 posts
WA, 118 posts
16 Feb 2009 11:59am
Ah, its all a big conspiracy. Just like the titanic and 9/11, dam hippies trying to take away coal power stations 'rights'. Yup.

Funny how subjective science can be when it directly affects you.

Anyway this post is not meant to be a discussion on whether global warming is real or not, I'm not interested in trying to convert the masses. That's a never-ending roundabout that's not going to go anywhere for people with already entrenched positions. I'm interested in the reactions of the majority of the population that does thing its real.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:23pm
Whilst it is true that if everyone in Oz smartened up their act it would make didly diff on the global scale until China/India/US etc extract the digit, it is still no reason whatsoever to shrug and do fk all about it.

For starters why wouldn't you do everything you can to protect our environment in Oz?? Why is the lazy, ignorant attitude the default, when usually small efforts go a long way? Using less water/power etc will actually REWARD you too, it just takes an alteration to your attitude in approaching the ideas, i.e. it is not a chore to adopt these habits, but something to save you biccies (and the bonus is good for our environment).

BTW, I simply cannot understand anyone who does not install a solar hot water heater in this day and age??? In the grand scheme of 'open planned living areas/outdoor kitchens/balinese entertainment areas' etc the $$$ for a solar water heater is chicken food, but selfish tossers say it is too exxy?? Idiots..

Should be manditory for every new house built I reckon.

Gotta get down from my soap box now cause the hole in the ozone is burning my noggin..
Durks
Durks
WA
118 posts
WA, 118 posts
16 Feb 2009 12:35pm
This is awesome, rational argument that constructs a reason for action


And in the grand scheme of things, as an Aussie, a person from a country rather than a country, we're a damn site dirtier than any other people on the planet. Number 1 polluters per capita, 50% of man-made crap from Electricity. It would make a greater impact if an average Australian took action than any other average individual on the planet.
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
16 Feb 2009 1:00pm
The odd thing is, that while most people get up and sing loudly from the "Global Warming" hymnbook, in practice they demonstrate that they really don't give a rats ass.
e.g. every time I come up to a crosswalk, if someone wants to cross they just walk up to the crosswalk and step onto it, often without even looking, causing about 50 tons of vehicles to come to a grinding halt, rather than have the poor pedestrian wait just 10 seconds 'til the next break in traffic.
They all do it. Young, old and in between.
There are two crosswalks on a road that I use very often and I note the fact every time iI use it.
Rarely do they look up and wait for a break in traffic and then move onto the crosswalk.
This is in spite of the fact that each car uses about half a litre of fuel or more to get back up to speed.
They know their rights and they intend to use them regardless of global warming or anything else.
So if 99% of the population regard it so lightly in such simple matters which they could do something to help, why should I bother?
They are probably in a hurry to get home and wash out a sardine tin so they can say "We're saving the planet! We recycle in our house."
Yeah, right!
Finish rinsing out your sardine tin and then jet off over East on your 'fly buys' or frequent flyer points. There's another 50 tons of CO2 for you.
cranky
cranky
440 posts
440 posts
16 Feb 2009 2:35pm
I'm stuck between giving a s#@t and not giving a s#@t, on one hand I try and consume as little and waste as little as I possibly can which is good for the environment and my pocket. On the other hand I took my family over seas for no other practicle reason than to relax, surf and have a nice time, add to this the petro chem surfboards, sailboards, burning fossils fuel for entertainment, consuming unneccessary products that require high energy use to maufacture - anything with glass, plastic, imported foods and the list goes on and on.

clearly I'm only paying lip service and as I see it so is everyone else.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
16 Feb 2009 2:55pm
cranky said...

I'm stuck between giving a s#@t and not giving a s#@t, on one hand I try and consume as little and waste as little as I possibly can which is good for the environment and my pocket. On the other hand I took my family over seas for no other practicle reason than to relax, surf and have a nice time, add to this the petro chem surfboards, sailboards, burning fossils fuel for entertainment, consuming unneccessary products that require high energy use to maufacture - anything with glass, plastic, imported foods and the list goes on and on.

clearly I'm only paying lip service and as I see it so is everyone else.


Actually crankster, I'd say the fact that you even have an awareness of your consumption and it's side-effects, puts you streets ahead of most boofheads, who exist purely and simply to devour everything they possibly can in one short lifetime.

Knowing what you contribute to the prob, is half the battle to reducing the impact you make.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Feb 2009 5:19pm
Durks said...
It would make a greater impact if an average Australian took action than any other average individual on the planet.


It would make a greater impact if an average Australian ^Industry took action than any other average individual on the planet.

OK, OK. Look for one I'd like to see PACKAGING changed. WTF is with packaging these days? I buy ...well anything and it takes 2 hours and a chainsaw to get through all the plastic.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Feb 2009 5:35pm
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
16 Feb 2009 5:08pm
Did I ever mention how much I LOATHE SUVs??

Well, wifey made me buy the cashed-up-sister-in-law's bloody Forester!!

OK it has very low kms, was a real bargain and it is a 2ltr 4cyl, not a full-blown V8 petrol guzzling monster.. still I feel dirty and ashamed.

Yes - seriously.

Sigh... life is full of corrupting compromises. I will have to try not to fart for a few weeks to compensate for losing my little hatchback.

MintoxGT
MintoxGT
WA
975 posts
WA, 975 posts
16 Feb 2009 5:53pm
elmo said...

Beware the Aardvarks


Dratts, beaten again

cranky
cranky
440 posts
440 posts
16 Feb 2009 6:10pm
getfunky said...

Did I ever mention how much I LOATHE SUVs??

Well, wifey made me buy the cashed-up-sister-in-law's bloody Forester!!

OK it has very low kms, was a real bargain and it is a 2ltr 4cyl, not a full-blown V8 petrol guzzling monster.. still I feel dirty and ashamed.

Yes - seriously.

Sigh... life is full of corrupting compromises. I will have to try not to fart for a few weeks to compensate for losing my little hatchback.




I don't think you would call the forrester an SUV under any usual classification, the average Camry would leave a bigger footprint.

elmo
elmo
WA
8895 posts
WA, 8895 posts
16 Feb 2009 7:10pm
getfunky said...

Did I ever mention how much I LOATHE SUVs??

Well, wifey made me buy the cashed-up-sister-in-law's bloody Forester!!

OK it has very low kms, was a real bargain and it is a 2ltr 4cyl, not a full-blown V8 petrol guzzling monster.. still I feel dirty and ashamed.

Yes - seriously.

Sigh... life is full of corrupting compromises. I will have to try not to fart for a few weeks to compensate for losing my little hatchback.




and then you discover that you can get down to some of those remote beaches without the crowds, justification provided,

but an SUV which doesn't see dirt

The new forresters are running 8L/100km that's not to bad
cwamit
cwamit
WA
1194 posts
WA, 1194 posts
16 Feb 2009 8:45pm
i think everyone should drive a v8, the quicker we deplete the worlds oil the faster we will reduce our emissions.


even if we drove all around in 1.2 ltre cars the fact is it wouldn't be until fuel becomes too expensive by being too scare that emissions will be reduced because we will require a different energy source.

we need industrial change not conservation of fossil energy that just continues to add more co2 but over a longer time frame... if self righteousness was an energy source some of the posters here could run there own cars.

Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
16 Feb 2009 11:08pm
Overpopulation = higher carbon emissions...

Bring back religious wars that wiped out whole civilisations...that's the only answer!

Otherwise we'll debate this until the icebergs are melting at our doorsteps!

Just to add...I spent 3hrs this arvo discussing sustainable building practices and environmental & ecological impacts/footprints with an environmental consultant...

I also got the ball rolling on my order for a 2kw PV solar connect system for my house...

Also, after enquiring about installing a 'solar-farm' on family-owned property was told that "in Vic. the installation would cost over $10k per annum on top of the interest charges, but if I lived in SA, or QLD, I would be making a $20k return on my investment"

You guys in SA, ACT, or QLD should be looking at this as a very good investment! Get onto it!
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply