brady said..
Actually much more complex than the above suggests. Here are just a few of the many concerns:
Big tobacco owns a massive proportion of the e-cigarette businesses. If they honestly believed it would stop people from smoking, would they do this?
The e-cigarettes are an entirely new way to get a new generation addicted - they have novelty flavoured stuff specifically to get the kids on board
The stigma and smell of cigarettes aren't there, and can "be smoked indoors". Thus people who would never consider smoking a cigarette are more likely to use these, and to use them in environments where they would never dream of smoking. It's like going back to the workplaces of the 1960s where people would smoke at their desks.
It is hard to imagine a product that big tobacco would more like to see readily available!
THe other issue is safety. Real risk to children of poisoning. Children really do not poison themselves by eating a cigarette. There have been a number of cases of children drinking the sweetened, flavoured nicotine cannisters and ending up seriously unwell/ICU. No deaths yet, but only a matter of time
For starters, you may wanna define the word, SMOKE
An E cig simply has no fire, so no smoke
If it admits no odour, then one cant get addicted through smell,
As a smoker, I cant see how big tobacco would prefer to c me on the E cig, I save money, and it feels like you would move away from smoking on prolonged use of E cig
Im not saying an E cig is perfect, but it seems like a massive improvement on contemporary smokes
Real Risk to children, that's bizzare, the ones I buy, there is no way of getting into the filter which stores the chemicals,
Again it cant be like the sixties, unless your defining smoke differently now