big-gazza said...
I think that the law as applied to advertising on the front label would look at what is reasonably implied by a person reading this label - if the impression given, is that "Jims' Fresh" - is in fact fresh orange juice, when it isnt - then the intent is obviously to deceive. If Jims surname is in fact Fresh - then I think then it would be in what context he has used his name in the branding - is it just his name on the label - or is it used to gain a commercial advantage or misrepresent its contents.
My thought is that it misrepresents its contents - being reconstituted; clearly isnt fresh by definition.
What if he has a company called "Jims Fresh" and he initially sells Fresh orange juice. Does that mean in the future if he were to sell concentrate juice he would have to change the company name? It's like that 'Fiji Spring Water' you can buy, it's bottled in Adelaide! I'm not sure where the law stands with this, but if I saw something that said Jims Fresh Orange juice, I would assume it would fresh. But then the law is an ass!