James Price Point "photos"

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
GypsyDrifter
GypsyDrifter
WA
2371 posts
WA, 2371 posts
16 Apr 2009 11:22am
There is an opportunity to have your message recognized.

I truley hope peoples complacency on this subject will not be the norm about this issue.

When: Saturday 2nd May @ 11am sharp

Where: Perth foreshore, Riverside Drive, Perth (near the Belltower, and Ferris Wheel)

Help create a giant human message!
Support this community action!
The Kimberley Whale Coast is under threat, and it is critical that the
community demonstrates opposition to the outrageous plan to build
an industrial gas complex on the pristine Kimberley Coast.
Please wear a red t-shirt on the day.

Link:- www.wilderness.org.au/news-events







arancini
arancini
WA
373 posts
WA, 373 posts
16 Apr 2009 5:10pm
so where else do you build it?
shark
shark
WA
361 posts
WA, 361 posts
17 Apr 2009 2:16am
here we go again.
Lots of Perth people who have never been there spouting crap about which they know nothing putting stupid bumper stickers on their cars and interfering in other peoples business. Well actually it is their business also cause the lights wouldnt be on in Perth if it wasnt for gas production.
Its not in the middle of the Kimberly its only 60km from Broome.
The only pity is they cant put it in the middle of Broome.
I guess Tim Winton will be rolled out along with an assorted bunch of alternative musicians who have never been there.

Oh and I guess "rock art" will suddenly be found there also. and perhaps another group of indigenous previously unknown in the area who suddenly have an afinity with that area.

Got no problem with the people who are affected and know the issues having their say.

Remember the "Save Mauds Landing" bumper stickers that every second Kombi in Fremantle had?
You ask them-"save it from what?"
"development"
But there is already development gone wild at Coral Bay and with the demise of Mauds there is still dozens of families living in accomodation that wouldnt be accepted in a refugee camp, years later. Approvals are near impossible to get for any improvement.

The Kimberly local people have approved James Price Point. It belongs to them, they live there, they are prepared to live with it.

Wait and see what is proposed before whinging blindly about it.
patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
17 Apr 2009 10:05am
Shark

It doesn't have a great deal to do with lights in Perth --- the LNG is for export but your point is pretty close.

I've been to going to Broome for the past 20 odd years and for the first time I'm making the effort in May to go to Cape Leveque. On the way we will be exploring the bays and coastline as much as possible because despite the dismissive tone of quite a few people in regard to the gas hub the area will be irreversibly altered and it won't be for the better in terms of the natural attractions. The whole region will change forever and become a bit more like the Pilbara - an industrial estate with a huge visual footprint.

The whole development needs to be managed extremely sensitively because once the corporates ( and they quite often only pay lip-service to the regulators) get on a roll it becomes unstoppable and any problems are usually solved by handing out more cash.

You are right about the "activists". I was talking to a friend in Broome yesterday and she commented that the "ferals" have hit town a month or so earlier than usual. I guess to protest the development.

The project seems inevitable and I really hope that they don't turn the area into another Karratha or Hedland.

Get up there soon if you can and have a look at the region before it changes forever.

Cheers
shark
shark
WA
361 posts
WA, 361 posts
17 Apr 2009 1:18pm
the vast bulk of what you see in Hedland and Karratha is iron ore infrastructure, not gas. Woodsides facility on Burrup Peninsula is probably 10% of the area taken up by them for industry. There are no trains, ship loaders, conveyors etc. Tanks are generally partially or fully buried for LNG. And the jetty is just that, a structure carrying a pipe and an access road and not much else.
However there will be a impact for sure.
I have been thru there quite a few times for work, and Maret Island, Browse, Scott Reef. And Where they have it now is far better all round than the previous proposals.

A much greater concern will be Rio's bauxite holding on Mitchel Plateau.
firiebob
firiebob
WA
3182 posts
WA, 3182 posts
17 Apr 2009 3:57pm
Ah Mauds Landing, that name brings back memories, we used to camp there in 77 I guess it has changed a little in that time, I'll have to Google Earth it and have a look
shark
shark
WA
361 posts
WA, 361 posts
17 Apr 2009 11:30pm
firiebob said...

Ah Mauds Landing, that name brings back memories, we used to camp there in 77 I guess it has changed a little in that time, I'll have to Google Earth it and have a look


I first went there in 92 and there was nothing there, last time I was there was 12 months ago and there was nothing there also except a gravel track.
So there is probably no need to get the sign board, dreadlocks and imitation leather sandals out at this stage!

Mauds has been a gazetted town site for around 100 years though.
elbeau
elbeau
WA
988 posts
WA, 988 posts
17 Apr 2009 11:31pm
If there is some way that the indigenous of the Kimberley can find work and a meaningful existence through this project then more strength to it.
patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
18 Apr 2009 1:36am
The construction phase is always a problem -- road trains. heavy haulage. (randy) workers looking for a distraction and any number of other issues.

Where there is one development the mindset becomes "well why don't we put a .... plant next to it to value add" as Mr Kumah from Peppi Grove would like to do in the Pilbara with his proposal. And at the LEAST there will be virtually a small town built to support the facility and its construction because I can't see a whole workforce traveling to Broome and back daily even if Broome could house them.

One of my first jobs (33 years ago) after high school was in Wickham in the Pilbara and Karratha, as most WA lads and ladettes would know is just down the road. Karratha and Dampier had iron ore facilities and some salt lakes but was still an interesting and fairly easy going place to live. It has taken considerably less than those 30 odd years to become a s..thole mainly suitable for making swags of money (of which most goes on living expenses) and has not much else going for it.

My main issue with building a "gas hub" on the Dampier Peninsula is that in very little time we could end up with a mini Burrup/Karratha on what is essentially a near to pristine stretch of coast that is relatively easy to access if you wanted.

I'll let you know after May when I get back from there if I will join the ferals to protest or just roll over for the good of the nation.

It's a little like Oakajee hey ?? but without the sailing......

GypsyDrifter
GypsyDrifter
WA
2371 posts
WA, 2371 posts
18 Apr 2009 4:56pm
WA Premier tries to lure $12 billion gas plant from Darwin Add to favourites

Story : 16th April 2009

The Japanese energy giant Inpex should reconsider its decision to build a gas plant in Darwin now that a deal to build one near Broome has been reached, the Premier of Western Australia says.

Traditional owners in Western Australia's Kimberley have struck a deal that paves the way for a multi-billion dollar gas plant in the region.

The Japanese gas company originally wanted to bring gas from the Browse Basin to the Kimberley but negotiations failed and the company chose to pipe the gas to Darwin instead.

The Western Australian Premier, Colin Barnett, says Inpex should re-think its decision.

"Inpex now would have the option of having a site in James Price Point.

"That is a far more economic way of developing their gas resource than piping it 900 kilometres to Darwin."

Japanese interest...Will this be good for OUR economy?...
grumplestiltskin
grumplestiltskin
WA
2331 posts
WA, 2331 posts
18 Apr 2009 6:10pm
Of course it is. We dont buy any of our own iron ore but its sale is good, no essential, to our economy.
manicskier
manicskier
VIC
772 posts
VIC, 772 posts
20 Apr 2009 8:44am
And if you worried about development and damage, better than a 900 Km pipeline
j murray
j murray
SA
947 posts
SA, 947 posts
20 Apr 2009 10:41am
Help, if ya gonna protest with coloured shirts, that would seem un-australian and the South Australian teachers are using RED in the same way for their little stouch with the guvmant, The tween distance will render it a bit of a fizzer Broom- Perth. It dosent have the support , best just go up there and get a job.
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
20 Apr 2009 1:16pm
If you ever fly over that area, the first thing that is very obvious is that there are thousands of kilometers of coastline and millions of acres behind it with just NOTHING on it, including tourists.
Get on Google earth and check it if you like.

If they wanted to industrialise the whole coast there would be major cause for complaint. But they are proposing one small section of coastline be utilised, probably about 3 or 4km in amongst the thousands that remain untouched.

The fact is, we live in an industrialised country and have got used to all the benefits that come along with that. Just listen to the whinging and whining when the benefits are scaled back or do not come fast enough. And probably from the same people who carry on about the development.

First world living standards all come at a cost and in this case the cost is the developement of a very small percentage of coastline.
If the majority of the people decide that they can do without the present lifestyle we have then we can cut back on the development. But that's not going to happen is it.
If you think we can, just look at the upheaval that the present cutback of a few percent of the jobs due to the latest economic downturn is causing.



Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply