Right hand lane

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Greenroom
Greenroom
WA
7608 posts
WA, 7608 posts
14 Nov 2007 11:30pm
Is it against the law to speed?
What is the speed limit on the freeway? Mostly 100kmh yeah?
So whats wrong with doing 100kmh in the right hand lane?
Is the right hand lane reserved for those who want to break the law?
Why do people come tearing up behind you wanting you to pull over or to go faster when the speed limit is clearly sign posted?
If I stayed in the right hand lane on 100kmh would I be in the wrong?
The Grinch
The Grinch
WA
733 posts
WA, 733 posts
14 Nov 2007 11:39pm

Phenomenal topic.

The problem you are encountering is the "Perth tw@t Effect".

Place any mild natured Perthian in a car and he/she transforms into a rushing octane fueled psycho who is in a desperate quest to anywhere fast. With the firm belief that EVERY other road user is a shAt driver and must be put in their place.

I drove 5 hours back from Gerro last weekend. As soon as I got into Perth. Bang. Accident. There are Really really REALLY bad drivers here!
spot1
spot1
WA
1588 posts
WA, 1588 posts
14 Nov 2007 11:44pm
yes
sumetimes
yes
were in a rush
no
greeny just letem past the wind will be back tursday
i know5 days is a long wait
kitecrazzzy
kitecrazzzy
WA
2184 posts
WA, 2184 posts
14 Nov 2007 11:46pm
check your speedo if you think everyone is speeding, dad has 30+ years of land/marine survey experience so i have had some interesting GPS systems to play with and our cars speedo is around 8% out [under reading] and 1% out in the newest and the 4X4 is 4% or so. manufacturers limit is 10% so you could be well under the limit.
but i would agree perth drivers have some real A holes but going <10km over the limit is hardly the worst offence you see.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
14 Nov 2007 11:49pm
Greenroom said...

Is it against the law to speed?
What is the speed limit on the freeway? Mostly 100kmh yeah?
So whats wrong with doing 100kmh in the right hand lane?
Is the right hand lane reserved for those who want to break the law?
Why do people come tearing up behind you wanting you to pull over or to go faster when the speed limit is clearly sign posted?
If I stayed in the right hand lane on 100kmh would I be in the wrong?


YEP!!!!! you're in the wrong!!!!! The Law and logic says anybody not overtaking stays left, I wish the cops would get tough with idiots who just sit in the right hand.

And I agree Mr Grinch Perth drivers are amongst the worst I've come across. Thought Greece was bad when we first got there, but after a while you realise they drive to a completely different etiquette, once you have that figured and drive like them it's fine.

And if you're in any doubt, check this link out.

www.aussiemagna.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19082
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
15 Nov 2007 12:41am
Yes... In an area that has a speed limit of 100 km/h. This road rule varies from state to state. In WA, you must keep left unless overtaking in areas of 90 km/h or more.

It is also an offense to travel at 20 km/h or less than the speed limit on a freeway in WA.

http://www.dpi.wa.gov.au/mediaFiles/lic_drivesafebook_part3.pdf (page 66).

And I agree... Perth has the most aggressive and least courteous drivers of anywhere I have driven in Aus...

If someone wants to go wreally wreally fasssstttt, that's up to them. Not my (and hopefully not your) job to determine, enforce or control the speed at which another driver chooses to travel

Stay cool, give way and watch the angry red faced () drivers
FilthyAmatuer
FilthyAmatuer
WA
877 posts
WA, 877 posts
15 Nov 2007 2:40am
Greenie, if someone wants to overtake ya just move out the way, oh yeh... my mate got fined by the cops driving in the right hand lane not overtaking anyone at the speed limit.
Zed
Zed
WA
1274 posts
Zed Zed
WA, 1274 posts
15 Nov 2007 8:45am
Right hand lane is the overtaking lane. If you want to do 100 you can do that in the middle lane
phoenix
phoenix
WA
51 posts
WA, 51 posts
15 Nov 2007 11:03am
nutting **s me more than people who hover in the RH land[}:)]
stribo
stribo
QLD
1628 posts
QLD, 1628 posts
15 Nov 2007 12:38pm
A few years ago i was driving from brisbane to perth.Aroud Broken Hill this guy in a clubsport commodore passed me doing at least 180k's .A few hours later i passed him while he was fueling up at a roadhouse.This went on for the rest of the trip,about 3 days.Now i was sitting on about 80-90 all the way.Twice i passed him while he was getting a ticket from the highway patrol.This still didn't deter him??? And well you guessed it first set of lights in perth i rolled up beside him ......
It just goes to show that speeding is pointless over any distance and short distances well you may save a cupla minutes but when you arrive your stressed, you have used more fuel,risked you own and others lives and maybe got flashed on the way.
When will people realize there is NO POINT!!! ffs.....
Rider5
Rider5
WA
567 posts
WA, 567 posts
15 Nov 2007 12:11pm
Perth drivers are the worst. So possesive and unpolite "im not going to let you in attitude" When I went to the UK if you drove up behind some one in the outside lane they quickly moved over to the next left lane, very civilized.
I agree stay out of the right hand lane. Share the road so that we can merge and we will have less traffic jams.

Perth Drivers =
Zed
Zed
WA
1274 posts
Zed Zed
WA, 1274 posts
15 Nov 2007 12:29pm
stribo said...

A few years ago i was driving from brisbane to perth.Aroud Broken Hill this guy in a clubsport commodore passed me doing at least 180k's .A few hours later i passed him while he was fueling up at a roadhouse.This went on for the rest of the trip,about 3 days.Now i was sitting on about 80-90 all the way.Twice i passed him while he was getting a ticket from the highway patrol.This still didn't deter him??? And well you guessed it first set of lights in perth i rolled up beside him ......
It just goes to show that speeding is pointless over any distance and short distances well you may save a cupla minutes but when you arrive your stressed, you have used more fuel,risked you own and others lives and maybe got flashed on the way.
When will people realize there is NO POINT!!! ffs.....


I guess the issue is not about speeding, but about being considerate. If someone wants to go faster than you, pull over and let them, if someone needs to pull out from a junction, flash your lights and let them. As everyone has said Perth drivers are pretty poor.

Zed
Zed
WA
1274 posts
Zed Zed
WA, 1274 posts
15 Nov 2007 12:43pm
Also the speed limits in Perth are so antiquated. Irrespective of whether it's legal or not 100km/hr on a freeway is too slow. When you consider a modern day car that has abs, airbags, traction control, stability control compared to cars 20 years there is a world of difference in regards to safety and control. Speed limits need to be increased. Unfortunately Australia has a poor record with road fatalities and the media/police/public have this misconception that speed kills. So therefore we have to have speed cameras to stop people doing 80 in a 70. Speed doesn't kill, it's excessive speed. E.g I drive down to Albany in my car, it has Abs, Stability, Airbags, stiff suspension and is designed to do 200km/hr. I've been driving for 20 years, it's a clear day and I have to pootle along at 110km/hr. I could quite safely do 160 on those roads and I don't think thats excessive. Now you have 'Johnno' and his 4 drunk mates, on his Ps, drunk, 1988 Commodore, bald tyres, doing 160 just out of Mt Barker, 3am, thats excessive.
stribo
stribo
QLD
1628 posts
QLD, 1628 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:50pm
Yes that may be right ZED but speeding is extremely inconsiderate as you are risking the lives of others
I was a delivery driver on perth roads for over 12 months in a sign written ute .Not one ticket and not one complaint Believe me i saw it all , the amount of times i was cut off,pulled out on braked hard in front of etc etc.But i kept my cool gave em a wave and went on my way.Thats being considerate not pressuring other drivers out of lanes etc. for the sake of a cupla minutes in our busy self important schedules .
stribo
stribo
QLD
1628 posts
QLD, 1628 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:54pm
MMM airbags aye ...Modern vehicle air bags are tested at 60k per hour impact .Hit something like a tree or even a roo at 160 and the car is in pieces ....
Feel safe now?
hoop
hoop
1979 posts
1979 posts
15 Nov 2007 12:56pm
What happens when you're doing 160 in your super safe car when Johnno and his pissed mates pull out in front you? I dont think your air bags are going to help you much then.
Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:02pm
Zed said...

Also the speed limits in Perth are so antiquated. Irrespective of whether it's legal or not 100km/hr on a freeway is too slow. When you consider a modern day car that has abs, airbags, traction control, stability control compared to cars 20 years there is a world of difference in regards to safety and control. Speed limits need to be increased. Unfortunately Australia has a poor record with road fatalities and the media/police/public have this misconception that speed kills. So therefore we have to have speed cameras to stop people doing 80 in a 70. Speed doesn't kill, it's excessive speed. E.g I drive down to Albany in my car, it has Abs, Stability, Airbags, stiff suspension and is designed to do 200km/hr. I've been driving for 20 years, it's a clear day and I have to pootle along at 110km/hr. I could quite safely do 160 on those roads and I don't think thats excessive. Now you have 'Johnno' and his 4 drunk mates, on his Ps, drunk, 1988 Commodore, bald tyres, doing 160 just out of Mt Barker, 3am, thats excessive.


Thats the reason they have speed limits. For people who *think* they are good drivers and can go at fast speeds. Of course speed kills, if we all drove around at 5kms an hour imagine how many deaths there would be. NONE. Everything happens much quicker at higher speeds. Our roads are not designed for speeds like that. A roo could jump out, i know hitting it at 100 is gonna hurt, but even 150 is a big difference.
And your car wouldnt be designed to do speeds like that either. Why do the race drivers have race tires, roll bars, fire extinguishers, 5point harness, helmet etcs. Because it is dangerous!!
stribo
stribo
QLD
1628 posts
QLD, 1628 posts
15 Nov 2007 2:05pm

You think this guys airbags saved him?
Zed
Zed
WA
1274 posts
Zed Zed
WA, 1274 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:08pm
But people are dying on our roads everyday doing 80, doing 100 so why not drop the speed limit? I've driven in France and in Germany where the speed limits are 160 in France and open speed limits (in sections) in Germany. They have lower road fatalities than Australia. Admitedly we don't have the best roads in the world, but the Mitchell freeway is as good as the motorways I've driven on in France.
Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:11pm
We wont drop the speed limit, because the government etc have to compare death rates and speed. They would have come to the conclusion that those speeds get you wherever you are going in a resonable time, and at a reasonable risk.
Zed
Zed
WA
1274 posts
Zed Zed
WA, 1274 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:11pm
stribo said...


You think this guys airbags saved him?


My point is for older more experienced drivers in newer, safer cars they should be allowed to go faster than some 17 yr old in a 20 year old Commy. How that's policed I don't know. At the end of the day how road fatalities are the highest in 10 years despite speed limits being dropped and the introduction of speed cameras etc. So surely the government have to adopt a differenct approach and try and understand the root of the problem, which isn't necessarily speeding, it's largely inexperience, alcohol, age etc.
stribo
stribo
QLD
1628 posts
QLD, 1628 posts
15 Nov 2007 2:15pm
Zed said...

But people are dying on our roads everyday doing 80, doing 100 so why not drop the speed limit? I've driven in France and in Germany where the speed limits are 160 in France and open speed limits (in sections) in Germany. They have lower road fatalities than Australia. Admitedly we don't have the best roads in the world, but the Mitchell freeway is as good as the motorways I've driven on in France.


Yes your right but whats the rush mate??? See my previous post about driving the length of the country the old hair and the tortise mate....
DL
DL
WA
659 posts
DL DL
WA, 659 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:35pm
Cars have improved in handling and safety over the years, but human reaction times have not. Perception and reaction times make up a large part of how quickly you can stop.

Good luck stopping when doing 200kmph when something jumps out on the road 100m in front of you.

At 200kmph, you will travel 100m in 1.8seconds.

Assuming you have relatively quick reactions:
0.5 sec is perception time (time to recognise there is something in front of you)
0.5 sec in reaction time (time between perceiving the problem and actually getting your foot to the brake)

This leaves 0.8 of a second to stop, and you are now 45m away doing 200kmph.

You have 2 options now:
1 - Kill the kid that fell off their dirt bike onto the highway.
2 - Kill yourself by swerving at 200kmph.

Have a look at this site: http://www.sdt.com.au/STOPPINGDISTANCE.htm
Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:39pm
Sure P's platers cause many fatalitess due to lack of experience, when they think they know it all.
Im learning to drive and the worst people are the old ones. The havent got a farking clue about their surroundings.If its not in their front window it doesnt exist. They try to let people out to "help them" when they have right of way, and confuse the **** out of everyone.
All of my near misses (many many of them), were either my fault, or some old hag whos got no idea of anything. I know its unfair, but they should be retested more often.
A bloke at works older sister worked at an old peoples home, and they spoke to hear about redoing their license. Many comments were like " You have to do stuff you never do, like check your blindspots and indicate."
I agree with older people being more experience, but how would they have any experience with high speeds. Also it would be very misleading for other road users, and would no doubt cause more accidents because of different speed judgment. It owuld be awkard, all traffic lights would not be useful, as they have their orange phase to be appropriate for the speed limit. Imagine the chaos of 50% of the population doing 60, and the rest do 80 or 100 even.

decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:41pm
I can see both zed's & stribo's point of view. But I think the answer is off to the side of both of them.
Personally I don't think Perth's driving problems is about rules, it's about drivers attitude. may be we've become too much of a nanny state, and people expect that all they have to do is obey the rules and everything will somehow be OK, they lost the ability to think and make decisions for themselves.
The places I've enjoyed driving the most are where most drivers are thinking about overall traffic flow, not just about there own progress.
I think with the driving culture as it is at the moment, increasing the speed limit, would be unsafe, Perth drivers need to change their attitude to others on the road first, take some responsibility for driving safely, fit where they are and what they do into other road users needs, that way traffic flows better, everybody is less stressed, road rage is reduced, and maybe then we can go a bit faster.

Anybody taken driving lessons lately, where did courtesy fit in the course???? I wonder because I've seen a number of P platers sitting in the right hand lane.
Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
15 Nov 2007 1:44pm
decrepit said...

Anybody taken driving lessons lately, where did courtesy fit in the course???? I wonder because I've seen a number of P platers sitting in the right hand lane.


Yep, no courtesy section. I was told when trying to get into another lane, "if the dont let you in, just cut infront of them" Good to see they are teaching the right attitude.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23685 posts
WA, 23685 posts
15 Nov 2007 2:45pm
What are "lanes" .

For that matter what is "traffic"
elmo
elmo
WA
8894 posts
WA, 8894 posts
15 Nov 2007 7:12pm
I think Everyboduy is loosing the plot of this discussion Again

If I'm doing 90kmh in the right hand lane

Go around

I was there first

I'm in front of you so who cares[}:)][}:)]

WINDY MILLER
WINDY MILLER
WA
3183 posts
WA, 3183 posts
15 Nov 2007 7:36pm
make undertaking illegal and everything will fall into place.

easty
easty
TAS
2213 posts
TAS, 2213 posts
15 Nov 2007 10:27pm
- Speed doesn't kill, it's the sudden stop.
- What's the story with air-bags? V8 supercars don't have them. If they can crash at 250kph and walk away, why don't car manufacturers build safety structures into their cars like racing cars?
- Drivers in Tassie are largely consdiderate, but don't realise that indicators exist. Or if they do, they'll put them on as they turn the corner!
kitecrazzzy
kitecrazzzy
WA
2184 posts
WA, 2184 posts
15 Nov 2007 9:15pm
i would have to say your a douche bag if you brake before indicating. its pretty much pointless to put your indicator on after everyone has seen your stopping.
also people on prescription drugs are a real danger.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply