Cambodge said...
I believe there would have been deeper implications in the voting system if Thompson had successfully "crossed the floor" and the Libs had thereby won the vote to have the gag order lifted. (Which was prevented by Pyne managing to escape before the doors were closed).
If the Libs had won the vote based on Thompson crossing the floor then they would be obliged in the future to grant Thompson a "pair" when (/if?) he has to leave parliament and misses a vote. If Thompson is granted a "pair" then the Libs won't gain anything when Thompson is away from Parliament and misses a vote because someone on the Lib side would miss their vote too and thus cancel out the effect of the Labs having one less vote.
Make sense? Parliamentary system...archaic, confusing, childish...Yes, but a sh!t load better than any other system that's been devised.
Let the games continue...
(One positive from all these antics is...It shows just how stable and mature our system of government is if these are considered to be the important events of our day...No worries about military coups, assassinations, etc. A pretty comfortable life here in Australia).
Errm.. an interesting take with two major flaws:
1. Thomson DID successfully cross the floor and vote with the opposition
2. The opposition DID win the vote and vote down the gag. In fact that was never in any doubt - they'd have won that vote even if Thomson had voted with the government. That's because the independents will ALWAYS vote against a gag motion unless it's something pretty flamin' major and there's enough of them to swing the vote whichever way they want as long as Lib/Labs vote against each other
..I see someone else has already shot holes in the "pair" theory. But you're right, our "issues" here are pretty puny compared to much of the rest of the world.