Seabreeze / Lauries new Graph format Suggestions

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
king of the point
king of the point
WA
1836 posts
WA, 1836 posts
6 Mar 2013 9:00pm
The new format is SO SO, im finding the arrows to be to fat and somewhat less accurate to look at .But the scale change is good and the brown arrows over 35 knots is a good introduction/ With out overdoing it. BUT,there may be scope for a forth colour for say glass offs / light and variable .

I also find the gaps between arrows on the days real time wind display to be very open making it look less accurate and linked , Nothing better than seeing solid green and a refined accurate graph, illestrating variations in wind strengh / direction from your days action on the water

Funny how when you really look on the original wind graphs,the arrows have variations in width of them. Does this mean any thing laurie

Version 4 Laruie
Try making the arrows twice as tight as the original and linked like a snake /dragon tail.

Im sure ill cope either way
dusta
dusta
WA
2940 posts
WA, 2940 posts
7 Mar 2013 12:33am
i've rung crimestoppers as whoever posted under KOTP's account is clearly no KOTP as that must be the first coherent post i have ever read from you
BennyB12
BennyB12
QLD
918 posts
QLD, 918 posts
7 Mar 2013 5:50am
Must be having a dry spell... Either that or the police are cracking down again...
hamburglar
hamburglar
ACT
2174 posts
ACT, 2174 posts
7 Mar 2013 9:33am
Or he's loosened up the hanky on his head

Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
7 Mar 2013 9:34am
It's possibly like the new forum design - I didn't get it...until I viewed it on my phone - much better. The new graphs are a bit 'cartoony' for me - but that's just me being picky - I'm sure I can survive with either also.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
7 Mar 2013 10:12am
Maybe the arrows don't give enough info?
Maybe a line chart with Max/Avg/Min for each time interval.
something like:


The cross point (close) representing the average.

Or an option to choice the chart type?
Macroscien
Macroscien
QLD
6809 posts
QLD, 6809 posts
7 Mar 2013 10:07am
FlySurfer said...
Maybe the arrows don't give enough info?
Maybe a line chart with Max/Avg/Min for each time interval.
something like:


The cross point (close) representing the average.

Or an option to choice the chart type?

With charts like that we are all going to loose our investment in boards and sails
beside reminds me another day at work
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23688 posts
WA, 23688 posts
7 Mar 2013 10:18am
Apart from the brown arrows - I didn't notice any change
Zuke
Zuke
901 posts
901 posts
7 Mar 2013 11:10am
Too detailed, don't need the swell to two decimal places and the tide to three. Also agree with Sailhack, the colours are too "cartoony".
Zuke
Zuke
901 posts
901 posts
7 Mar 2013 3:08pm
The tide readings don't make sense. We now get it to three decimal places (which is ridiculous) but when you scroll across the tide you only get one reading every hour.

Can this go back to how it was before?

laurie
laurie
QLD
3902 posts
QLD, 3902 posts
7 Mar 2013 6:38pm


Cheers for the feedback.

Ironically, the colours are identical to the original, just the border is less black.


im finding the arrows to be to fat ... I also find the gaps between arrows on the days real time wind display to be very open making it look less accurate and linked


Not following this .. fatter arrows reduce the gaps, yet you're saying there's more gaps? Are you referring to the live wind, or the forecasts?


We now get it to three decimal places (which is ridiculous) but when you scroll across the tide you only get one reading every hour.


Too much accuracy is a bad thing? I agree, it could be less. But to 10cm intervals is not such a bad thing. I've been grounded on a catermeran at Shark Bay for hours waiting for the tide to lift 5cm so we could get out.... .. it taught me to respect that a 10cm difference in tide is a big thing!


when you scroll across the tide you only get one reading every hour.


Should not be the case .. which location?


Funny how when you really look on the original wind graphs,the arrows have variations in width of them. Does this mean any thing laurie?


Just an artifact of a "not as accurate as the current rendering system", which is again, somewhat ironic!

Anybody else experiencing something odd (with the graphs), let me know ..
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
7 Mar 2013 4:42pm
Maybe slightly smaller arrows? They do look a bit fatter-ish

I like the new graphs tbh, very cool
Zuke
Zuke
901 posts
901 posts
7 Mar 2013 5:10pm
pm sent Laurie.

Forgot to add: 1cm is good eg:0.95M but to the mm eg: 0.952M is too much.
TurtleHunter
TurtleHunter
WA
1675 posts
WA, 1675 posts
7 Mar 2013 6:49pm
laurie said...


Cheers for the feedback.

Anybody else experiencing something odd (with the graphs), let me know ..



I can't seem to find our live graph
I suppose I will have to keep using this one
weather.aims.gov.au/
king of the point
king of the point
WA
1836 posts
WA, 1836 posts
7 Mar 2013 7:57pm
laurie said...


Cheers for the feedback.

Ironically, the colours are identical to the original, just the border is less black.


im finding the arrows to be to fat ... I also find the gaps between arrows on the days real time wind display to be very open making it look less accurate and linked


Not following this .. fatter arrows reduce the gaps, yet you're saying there's more gaps? Are you referring to the live wind, or the forecasts?


We now get it to three decimal places (which is ridiculous) but when you scroll across the tide you only get one reading every hour.


Too much accuracy is a bad thing? I agree, it could be less. But to 10cm intervals is not such a bad thing. I've been grounded on a catermeran at Shark Bay for hours waiting for the tide to lift 5cm so we could get out.... .. it taught me to respect that a 10cm difference in tide is a big thing!


when you scroll across the tide you only get one reading every hour.


Should not be the case .. which location?


Funny how when you really look on the original wind graphs,the arrows have variations in width of them. Does this mean any thing laurie?


Just an artifact of a "not as accurate as the current rendering system", which is again, somewhat ironic!

Anybody else experiencing something odd (with the graphs), let me know ..



Referring to live wind........big gaps between the NEW fat arrows makes it look like the wind is gusty in comparison to the old graph format of tight solid green, its just less accurate to look at. This also goes for variations in direction as well.

The forcast fatter arrows seem to do the same even though there linked it makes it appear more as a blob / cartoony a little less easy to see the predicted direction and changes forcasted

[b]Again its my feed back only ,ill cope with it..... as is.[/b

There was nothing better to see than solid Green thin sharp spear like arrows linked with no gaps snaking across the page

any way thats that, me political input ........dont forget to vote WA March 9 dont score a fine

Have a good one

Ps Dont forget my birthday Laurie ive been addicted for 10 year as of the 17 th of October 2013.........

adolf
adolf
1862 posts
1862 posts
7 Mar 2013 10:19pm
Don't know if there is a setting so I can avoid this - probably is. However, on my iphone I have difficulty scrolling sideways as the javascript kicks in and I get a popup with wind speeds and directions. What's with the "More...." button in the bottom left hand corner.

Seems to be a bit cluttered on an iphone.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23688 posts
WA, 23688 posts
8 Mar 2013 12:03am
adolf said...
................ iphone ............... javascript ..............


hey what tha?



adolf
adolf
1862 posts
1862 posts
9 Mar 2013 5:34pm
Mark _australia said...
adolf said...
................ iphone ............... javascript ..............


hey what tha?






Laurie knows what I mean.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply