Strange even for Hollywood

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
16 Jan 2009 2:26pm
I saw the movie "300" on the movie channel while I was on hols. It's the story of the 300 Spartans who held up the mighty Persian army of Xerxes in 480 BC at Thermopylae. There was another movie made about that a long time ago called "300 Spartans" if memory serves.

You'd expect to see a bit of historical background and maybe an attempt to portray the occasion with a bit of fidelity. But no. Hollywood almost never fails to disappoint. I should know that by now. This movie takes CGI to new depths of turgid incredibility. It looked like a computer game. The characters, loosely based on historical persons, looked, sounded and acted like they stepped out of a computer game. It had all the appeal of watching someone else play a computer game.

Minus 5 stars from me.

I hope this gamy genre doesn't catch on.

shear tip
shear tip
NSW
1125 posts
NSW, 1125 posts
16 Jan 2009 3:31pm
Hollywood? It was done right here in Sydney.
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
16 Jan 2009 2:39pm
shear tip said...

Hollywood? It was done right here in Sydney.


eeeehew... It wont catch on then.
grumplestiltskin
grumplestiltskin
WA
2331 posts
WA, 2331 posts
16 Jan 2009 1:52pm
.... and its entire direction was to look and feel like a comic.

It was never meant to be "historical" just visually stunning, which I thought it was.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Jan 2009 4:27pm
Best review of 300 ever:
www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=8516&IBLOCK_ID=35
The Grinch
The Grinch
WA
733 posts
WA, 733 posts
16 Jan 2009 8:23pm

They are already Making 301
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
17 Jan 2009 10:12am
Oh, and I thought it was just another 'Rocky' sequel.....(we'd nearly be up to 300 by now?!?)
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
17 Jan 2009 10:18am


That review is a little more historically correct....and haven't I seen the author on 'The office' (original/pommy version)

Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
17 Jan 2009 10:26am
The characters weren't cgi. Well the 300 weren't. They were all ripped like that for the movie.
Arnold
Arnold
46 posts
46 posts
17 Jan 2009 12:47pm
I liked that movie, a great story of an actual event that took place in history (even if it wasn't 100% accurate) it was meant to look like a bit like a comic book, by the same dude who did 'Sin City' I think.

Where the actors got in shape:
www.gymjones.com/knowledge/articles
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
17 Jan 2009 10:42pm


That review was informative and interesting. Interesting a U.S. liberal writer has taken refuge in a plutocracy like Russia.

However Notwal's review was to the point and took less time to read for the same effect.


getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
20 Jan 2009 11:16am
If CGI enhanced homo-erotica is your thing then you will dig 300.

If you are lookin for a film with the barest of plot/characters/originality then 90% of hollywood is not gonna do it for ya.

The Cohen Bros do break the formulae though.. check out No country for old men, for one intense and brilliant flick.
Arnold
Arnold
46 posts
46 posts
20 Jan 2009 12:16pm
getfunky said...

If CGI enhanced homo-erotica is your thing then you will dig 300.

If you are lookin for a film with the barest of plot/characters/originality then 90% of hollywood is not gonna do it for ya.

The Cohen Bros do break the formulae though.. check out No country for old men, for one intense and brilliant flick.



NCFOM was good...except for the ending, which went to wrong town, even more dissapointing than using a KA windsurfing sail. I think those Cohen bros. did that 'Burn After Reading' ...Burn Before Viewing IMO.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply