Super negative annuation

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
10 Dec 2011 3:31pm
Like most people I have the government tell me what's right, wrong and impose their will on me.
The government forces my employer to take 9% from my pay and give it to a private company who will supposedly make it grow so the government doesn't have to look after me when I'm 65.

That's the theory anyway, the reality of it is that a lot of employers are retarded and put it in the super company of their choice, even if you specified your own... making you lose time and money trying to get it out.
Super accounts get opened here and there, until the fees wipe them out.
A lot of people won't live to use their super, and the government may raise the age... I call that the Donkey and Carrot trick.

Even if your employer does put it in the right company, that company doesn't usually do any better than a savings account and when you include their fees, and other bullsh!t, worse.

When the economy was booming, the stock market up ~12% a year my super was making around 8%... then in 2007-2009 it lost 32%.

2010 is with another super company called OnePath which used to be ING. They claim it lost 2.4%, but that's not what my balance reflects... the balance reflects a loss of 16%, most of it "Government Taxes".

So OnePath only has a 1 year of my deposits... but WTF man!!! -16%, where as I was earning 6.11% in my UBank savings account... oh wait the government takes 1/2 in taxes and the other goes in inflation.

So in reality if I kept MY MONEY, in a bank account I'd break even, where as with crapshotPath I'm down 19%.

So what's the deal on self managed super?
How do I get it done?
Can I avoid all fees?
How has your super performed (self managed or not)?
Do you actively monitor it, or just ignore it and hope for the best?

Thanks.


pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
10 Dec 2011 4:32pm
There are fees associated with self managed super funds which amount to some thousands of dollars a year even if the super fund only has 10 cents in it. You need a fund balance of about 250 thousand before it makes much sense, compared to some of those low fee super funds now available.
If you decide to go down that path you will first have to set up a trustee company, if you don't already have a company registered. The trustee company then acts as the trustee for the super fund that you set up.
Sooo,, there is an annual ASIC fee of around $276 (from recollection) for the company plus accounting costs for the mandatory audit of the accounts for the company and the super fund.

They generally say the annual cost are about $2000 per year but I set up my own self managed super fund some years back and the annual costs run to about $4000 each year, mainly for accounting costs and audit procedures.
If you were an accountant you could do it cheaper than that because you could do your own accounting and just pay for the independent audit, probably $1000 to $1500. Accountants charge around $150 to $200 an hour for that sort of stuff because they are all retired rocket scientists and brain surgeons.

It has still been well worthwhile because I don't mind spending the time to shuffle funds between investments as conditions change. And change they do.
The big advantage to a super fund is that there is a flat tax rate of 15% on all income within the fund. If you just left the money in your own name you would be paying up to 50% tax and medicare levy on any income it makes, and that hurts.
Also, if you're over 50, you can pay into the fund up to $50,000 a year out of your income at the tax rate of 15%.
After you retire, the annual income from the entire fund is tax free. That's the present rule but Julia can change that at any time if the upkeep on her pet Swann needs more money. It would be a very "courageous" decision on her part however because it would upset a lot of people and I don't think she could afford that at the moment.

I should add not to leave all this until the last few years of your working life because after you retire you can't keep putting mioney into your super fund for more than 2 years I think. So if you sell any significant asset, then the proceeds are locked out of the fund and any income from this is taxed at your marginal tax rate.
And don't think you will evade it by dropping dead because they see through that cheap trick and they just tax your estate.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
10 Dec 2011 7:55pm
I'd still much rather pay off my mortgage at a guaranteed ~7.5% each year.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
11 Dec 2011 12:00pm
Thanks pweedas, that's good info... makes me angry though, $4000 a year just to manage my retirement fund.
That's even worse than the fees that are currently whittling away at my retirement.

What other options are there?
I need to find a strategy that allows low risk growth > inflation, with low fees... my personal investments have $0 fees (some of the ETF's have % fee built in), some pay dividends, but they perform better than my super, but not to the extent that I could absorb $4000/pa with my current balance... and I've made bad mistakes in the pass like "Sons Of Gwalia", farkers, and that goes for Ferrier Hodgson too.

Is it possible to have super sent abroad, say if I had a UK pension?
What about a super company with low fees that just bought government bonds?

evlPanda said...

I'd still much rather pay off my mortgage at a guaranteed ~7.5% each year.

How does that work?
Underoath
Underoath
QLD
2434 posts
QLD, 2434 posts
11 Dec 2011 11:38am

evlPanda said...

I'd still much rather pay off my mortgage at a guaranteed ~7.5% each year.

How does that work?



You are simply not paying interest on your debt. Reduce debt first.
SP
SP
10982 posts
SP SP
10982 posts
11 Dec 2011 9:55am
Pweedas info is good.

It's not so much the provider it is the investment option -16 if this is the investment return I'd guess about 60-80% would be in shares, mostly Australian.
The taxes are the contribution tax of 15% on all contributions and any capital gains in the fund.
Also you may have insurance in the fund which means your balance goes down because the premiums are drawn from your fund.


As for fees
Retail fund 2-3%pa ( one path, colonial first state etc)

Smsf
Usallly abou 5k to set up, then ongoing, about $1800 pa to audit the fund, annual requirement. About 3k for someone to manage the fund, investment advice, access to investments. and then depends on investment options but for instance shares, term deposits etc wouldn't have any fees as you hold them directly.

So annually is about 4k all up to run a smsf. Usually more if you hold a property in the fund.

Yes you can transfer a uk pension from the uk in most circumstances but seriously call a professional cause sometimes there taxes etc. As for going the other way uk pensions aren't that great.


SP
SP
10982 posts
SP SP
10982 posts
11 Dec 2011 9:59am
Underoath said...


evlPanda said...

I'd still much rather pay off my mortgage at a guaranteed ~7.5% each year.

How does that work?



You are simply not paying interest on your debt. Reduce debt first.


You cannot pay your mortgage from your super unless you meet a condition of release of your superfund, ie totally permanently disabled over 60, permanently retired.

If you mean pay your mortgage off instead of add too super, we'll probably but not in all cases..

FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
11 Dec 2011 5:19pm
SP said...
As for going the other way uk pensions aren't that great.


Yes, but last time I checked the UK lets you access your pension when your 50 with no penalty... I would like to go to a 3rd world country and live it up on a beach when I retire, not sure what my stamina will be like @ >65.

Oh well looks like I'm stuck with retail/industry funds until I have enough to make it worth while.

I over heard somebody at works say he was using his pension money to load up on gold and part of a farm... I'm going to have to start a conversation up.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
12 Dec 2011 11:11am
I spoke to the guy at work who bought gold and turns out jewellery, painting and antiques.

He pays $890 a year and this mob: www.superhelp.com.au/?%2FSpecial-Offers%2Ffree-fund-setup_html do everything for him from his personal return to the annual audit.
Little Jon
Little Jon
NSW
2115 posts
NSW, 2115 posts
12 Dec 2011 2:02pm
You are probably better off going with an industry fund (not for profit) than self managed unless you have half a million or so the fees are too high.
K Dog
K Dog
VIC
1847 posts
VIC, 1847 posts
13 Dec 2011 12:54pm
Am pretty sure you can do it cheaper than $1000 a year.....
I used to work as a tax accountant and we'd audit super funds for circa $400 for the basic ones... You can get package deals on setting it up.... its not in the $1000's... I am pretty sure....

www.esuperfund.com.au/fees/fee-schedule/new-smsf

www.thesmsfreview.com.au/comparison-table-smsf.html

There are some pros and cons... a lot of industry super funds have large purchasing power and can get into investments you normally couldn't... and can buy things like TPD and income protection for a lot less than you could as an individual.... and this does matter if you hurt yourself (kiting) and can't work for 12 months.... or have a car accident...

Also a good super fund lets you choose your mix... and you can go cash if you want to... and it should guarentee about the same as term deposits... also a lot of people don't realize you can size up your returns and request the superfund to personally explain bad performance.... don't forget "They work for you", but like the banks.... they forget that...... (and like the Governments).... so you can actually demand loss income if they fark something up like a delayed transfer of other super which could have been earning a higher rate they are obliged to pay the difference.... lots of things most people don't know about what they are required to do....

But the downside is that the Superfunds, IMO will be sprung for some serious gouging of investor funds and conflict of interest in the coming years... they have been off the radar until recently... the fund managers are getting paid for good and bad performance... I think the current system is very pro-corporation (trustee) and they are milking it.....

Despite the markets being low on the capital value side (all ords sub 4000), in AUS profits have been quite good (banks), so why not the return on capital????

I recon a scandal is just around the corner... and some more severe regulation.... since we all know self regulation is a fkn joke....
K Dog
K Dog
VIC
1847 posts
VIC, 1847 posts
13 Dec 2011 12:55pm
And if you do do SMSF, beware of what people say about investing in art, collectors items etc... ATO have cracked down a lot on people trying to loop hole stuff that could be of direct personal benefit.....
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply