The future of fuels

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
9 Jul 2012 12:44pm
This article is interesting. Basically says truck industry can't run on electricity...

http://theage.drive.com.au/motor-news/hydrogen-not-the-answer-ford-20120706-21ljc.html

I still think we need to adjust to Micro Electric Cars, and Ultra Light Vehicles, and probably 3 star crash ratings.

In Tokyo / Yokohama, the 1st vehicle for the family is probably an Electric Assist Bicycle, the 2nd, a normal bike, and the 3rd, a pram. (Plus the ultra frequent train network).
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
9 Jul 2012 1:40pm
Also it's stating the obvious, that hydrogen is about as useful a fuel as gunpowder.

The next leap might be large scale algae plants (ha ha) that convert waste plastic, oil, and captured C02 to fuel.

Already exist on a small scale, just a matter of scaling up and making the energy in vs energy out equations work.

CMC
CMC
QLD
3954 posts
CMC CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
9 Jul 2012 2:03pm
Most trucks in Thailand for example run on LPG. Look kind of scary though with 6 big gas cylinders behind the cab.

I was thinking when I seen them if they might one day carry Hydrogen and blow up half of the country with an accident.

No problems to the Thai's though. Not a silly thing to do just destiny as per Buddha.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
9 Jul 2012 1:13pm
Apply Higgs particules to water and ask them to give the water particules the shape of fuel particules!
Easy!
Beaglebuddy
Beaglebuddy
1595 posts
1595 posts
9 Jul 2012 4:08pm
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that electric vehicles have serious limitations.
The future is fossil fuels, specifically natural gas.
Unless we are allowed to build massive amounts of nuclear power plants energy will always be expensive and 100 years from now we will still be burning oil and gas for energy.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
9 Jul 2012 6:42pm
Beaglebuddy said...

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that electric vehicles have serious limitations.
The future is fossil fuels, specifically natural gas.
Unless we are allowed to build massive amounts of nuclear power plants energy will always be expensive and 100 years from now we will still be burning oil and gas for energy.


Your "allowed" to build them, but no one want's to cause they're so expensive to build and the generated power is too high priced.

"the future is fossil fuels".....Really?....no Really!

Do you think that they'll be any oil in 100 years?.....well, will there be oil that doesn't cost thousands of dollars per barrel?.
Beaglebuddy
Beaglebuddy
1595 posts
1595 posts
9 Jul 2012 4:51pm
log man said...

Beaglebuddy said...

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that electric vehicles have serious limitations.
The future is fossil fuels, specifically natural gas.
Unless we are allowed to build massive amounts of nuclear power plants energy will always be expensive and 100 years from now we will still be burning oil and gas for energy.


Your "allowed" to build them, but no one want's to cause they're so expensive to build and the generated power is too high priced.

"the future is fossil fuels".....Really?....no Really!

Do you think that they'll be any oil in 100 years?.....well, will there be oil that doesn't cost thousands of dollars per barrel?.

Try and build a plant and the lawyers and pressure groups will have you dead in the water.
Do some research and you will see that there are plenty of fossil fuels in the ground still untapped, and it is common knowledge that an oil well that has run dry will produce oil again after it has been left alone for a while.
Only the easy to get stuff is being used now, artesian wells that spout oil and gas all by themselves without even pumping, it will just get a bit harder to get out of the ground.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
9 Jul 2012 5:04pm
Synthetic oil, where does that come from?
SandS
SandS
VIC
5904 posts
VIC, 5904 posts
9 Jul 2012 7:22pm
Beaglebuddy said...

log man said...

Beaglebuddy said...

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that electric vehicles have serious limitations.
The future is fossil fuels, specifically natural gas.
Unless we are allowed to build massive amounts of nuclear power plants energy will always be expensive and 100 years from now we will still be burning oil and gas for energy.


Your "allowed" to build them, but no one want's to cause they're so expensive to build and the generated power is too high priced.

"the future is fossil fuels".....Really?....no Really!


Do you think that they'll be any oil in 100 years?.....well, will there be oil that doesn't cost thousands of dollars per barrel?.

Try and build a plant and the lawyers and pressure groups will have you dead in the water.
Do some research and you will see that there are plenty of fossil fuels in the ground still untapped, and it is common knowledge that an oil well that has run dry will produce oil again after it has been left alone for a while.
Only the easy to get stuff is being used now, artesian wells that spout oil and gas all by themselves without even pumping, it will just get a bit harder to get out of the ground.



Hey Beagle B , you blokes over there may have to stop driving around in F 650 pickups though !!

Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
9 Jul 2012 7:34pm
If I lived in a Metropolis CBD area, roughly 2-20km to work/home, I would get an Electric Bike. It would get you in there quicker than any other method.
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
9 Jul 2012 7:49pm
Why are electric motors no good for trucks while plenty of trains use electricity, either diesel electric or fully electric? I'm not an electrical engineer so am not sure.

I agree that hydrogen is not a fuel for the future. It takes a fair bit of energy to make hydrogen and it would be difficult to store and transport the gas around.


Found an interesting article about peak oil here. This is from a bloke who was convinced it was happening.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/02/peak-oil-we-we-wrong

The idea of making fuel from bacteria is pretty interesting. However its probable hydrocarbons pumped up out of the ground will be reasonably priced for a long time to come.

Alternative fuels will struggle.

Australia has heaps of petroleum gas that can be liquified. We should run all our cars as much as possible on the stuff. LPG should be a lot cheaper too.





kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
9 Jul 2012 8:02pm
The future of electricity generation could be thorium molten salt nuclear reactors, probably liquid flouride thorium type.

Masses of fuel, thorium is everywhere. Safe design (beginings of a traditional meltdown stop all reactions dead), small scale (house sized), and they can process existing nuclear waste into much less harmful/shorter half-life stuff while making electricity from it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor

Here is a nice vid of a cloud chamber showing the trails made by particles emitted during radioactive decay of thorium.
Beaglebuddy
Beaglebuddy
1595 posts
1595 posts
10 Jul 2012 5:33am
Mobydisc said...

Why are electric motors no good for trucks while plenty of trains use electricity, either diesel electric or fully electric? I'm not an electrical engineer so am not sure.


Trains are connected directly to the power grid thru the third rail or overhead wires, trucks need a battery to store the electricity and they have not been able to come up with good affordable batteries despite throwing hundreds of billions of dollars at the problem.
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
10 Jul 2012 7:34am
Beaglebuddy said...

Mobydisc said...

Why are electric motors no good for trucks while plenty of trains use electricity, either diesel electric or fully electric? I'm not an electrical engineer so am not sure.


Trains are connected directly to the power grid thru the third rail or overhead wires, trucks need a battery to store the electricity and they have not been able to come up with good affordable batteries despite throwing hundreds of billions of dollars at the problem.



That is true with electric trains. Diesel electric trains are not connected to a grid. Perhaps there is little benefit to have a diesel electric truck compared to the cost.



BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
10 Jul 2012 2:17pm
Bio-Diesel - made from 2nd & 3rd grade / cast aside oilseed varieties the likes of : Canola , Linseed , Rapeseed etc
We have the capacity to grow more of these varieties here in Aust to sustain something viable
There's less soap by-product from the purer stock of the above compared to waste oil from Fast Food outlets which have carbon deposits too.

Ethanol - we haven't got it as yet in WA at S/Stns & again we have the capacity to grow more cane to sustain.
Kiting
Kiting
77 posts
77 posts
10 Jul 2012 3:56pm
Fischer Tropsch diesel has legs from my understanding of the topic. Can use coal or trees or any bio mass to create carbon free diesel, all of the carbon is captured in the manufacturing process. I am no chemist so cannot explain to great detail.

mineral1
mineral1
WA
4564 posts
WA, 4564 posts
10 Jul 2012 4:05pm
Mobydisc said...

Why are electric motors no good for trucks while plenty of trains use electricity, either diesel electric or fully electric? I'm not an electrical engineer so am not sure.



Moby, Diesel electric has a small issue, compared to diesel via gearbox power to the wheels.
Diesel electric you can have considerable top end speed, and low torque or lots of torque and limited top end speed, all depends on gearing set up.
You can run with a gearbox coupled behind generator/alternator, to the diff, but by then you cost are through the roof and defeat your purpose.
Horses for courses
The development is getting better in this area, but not to the level we need at moment in industry
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
10 Jul 2012 6:33pm
BDP: small fact for interests sake - Canola IS rapeseed oil. CANadian OiL Association decided it needed a less rapey name to sell better.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15105 posts
WA, 15105 posts
10 Jul 2012 4:49pm
doggie said...

Synthetic oil, where does that come from?


It comes from the tropical Synthafrangapani plant. They crush it to remove all the waste material, and what you are left with is the raw synthoil.

Some people use it for strange purposes, but otherwise it can be very useful.

Alternatively, they can use normal (ex-dino) oil and do some magic to it to change the chain-length to an ideal range... or something like that.

dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
10 Jul 2012 6:51pm
kiteboy dave said...

BDP: small fact for interests sake - Canola IS rapeseed oil. CANadian OiL Association decided it needed a less rapey name to sell better.

CANadian Oil Low Acid

It's a hybrid rapeseed plant developed so that the oil is non-toxic. Garden variety rapeseed oil is toxic.



stuk
stuk
NSW
894 posts
NSW, 894 posts
10 Jul 2012 9:05pm
Not sure where I read it but I believe that there is more oil under Alaska and Nth Canada than there is in the middle east. The powers that be (ie:"they"), believe it is not yet economically viable to extract it at this point in time.

Wait for the price of oil to rise and you can see where the next environmental battle will be.
Tractorguy
Tractorguy
TAS
543 posts
TAS, 543 posts
10 Jul 2012 9:39pm
Simondo said...

This article is interesting. Basically says truck industry can't run on electricity...

http://theage.drive.com.au/motor-news/hydrogen-not-the-answer-ford-20120706-21ljc.html

I still think we need to adjust to Micro Electric Cars, and Ultra Light Vehicles, and probably 3 star crash ratings.

In Tokyo / Yokohama, the 1st vehicle for the family is probably an Electric Assist Bicycle, the 2nd, a normal bike, and the 3rd, a pram. (Plus the ultra frequent train network).



I dont think the long term future is with any fossill based fuel, ethonol is dearer than unleaded ?, Micro electric looks appealing , Lets go back to the horse and cart , life was much simpler
Mr float
Mr float
NSW
3452 posts
NSW, 3452 posts
12 Jul 2012 10:20am
I have been riding an electric bike for years for commuting . I save around $1500 per year in fuel, I also get more excercise than when i would drive , my car spends most of its life in the shed. I used to be an evangelist and told everyone about how good they are .i have given up .most Aussies would drive to the dunny if they could . My own brother was bitchin about how his once easy commute in the NW of Sydney has now ground to a halt ,Isuggested an e bike .He said that he did not want his company paid car sitting in the garage gathering dust and also said that riding a bike was too dangerous (I asked how could it be dangerous if the traffic was crawling along at 20 km/h) Having said that i generally use side roads (except yesterday i had to use a 100 m stretch of 4 lane road ,a young woman when past in my lane leaving no room and ran me off the road ,I was making good speed too around on a light downhill stretch but she had to pass me .i had the audacity to ride up to her window and suggest that she gives bike riders more room .i was abused and tooted by other drivers who also saw me run off the road by her .)



Simondo said...

If I lived in a Metropolis CBD area, roughly 2-20km to work/home, I would get an Electric Bike. It would get you in there quicker than any other method.


Wineman
Wineman
NSW
1412 posts
NSW, 1412 posts
12 Jul 2012 11:01am

There is thorium molten salt nuclear reactors as mentioned by Kiteboy Dave, and

"Nuclear fusion has many potential attractions. Firstly, its hydrogen isotope fuels are relatively abundant - one of the necessary isotopes, deuterium, can be extracted from seawater.

ITER (originally an acronym of International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering project, which is currently building the world's largest and most advanced experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor at the Cadarache facility in the south of France."
"The project is funded and run by seven member entities ??" the European Union (EU), India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

Neutrons generated are a problem, and may damage reactor materials!
Beaglebuddy
Beaglebuddy
1595 posts
1595 posts
12 Jul 2012 9:55am
Just making the point that there is a difference between fuel and energy.
Skid
Skid
QLD
1499 posts
QLD, 1499 posts
12 Jul 2012 1:18pm
Beaglebuddy said...

Just making the point that there is a difference between fuel and energy.



Correct!
And Just because an object contains energy, doesn't mean the energy can be easily accessed.
Based on E = mC^2 and my ex-wife's mass, she should have had heaps of energy.
But she still had trouble finding the energy to get her ass off the couch!
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
12 Jul 2012 1:43pm
dinsdale said...


CANadian Oil Low Acid
It's a hybrid rapeseed plant developed so that the oil is non-toxic. Garden variety rapeseed oil is toxic.


My bad for going off memory not googling it.

Also yes beagle, I was steering off topic with the nuke. Until they make 'Mr Fusion' that is.

Ian K
Ian K
WA
4170 posts
WA, 4170 posts
12 Jul 2012 12:11pm
Simondo said...


I still think we need to adjust to Micro Electric Cars, and Ultra Light Vehicles, and probably 3 star crash ratings.




Agreed, the first hurdle is to find alternative status symbols for those that need them. The amount of fossil fuel that is currently being unnecessarily burnt in the pursuit of status will be looked back upon in horror as we run out of the stuff. Unnecessarily large SUVs and houses burn up a good percentage of fossil fuels.

Our ancestors made do with a more ornate axe head. We need to go back to something like that. Our hundred year oil supply will then last 200 years.

The need by some for large SUVs has a trickle down effect. Crash ratings are size relative. When a 5 star Fantasyland Cruiser collides with a 5 star Yaris, the Yaris gets more like 3 and the Cruiser gets 7. As you say 3 stars is tolerable but most of us are already there, so no smaller just yet.


Macroscien
Macroscien
QLD
6809 posts
QLD, 6809 posts
12 Jul 2012 2:29pm
Ian K said...

Simondo said...


I still think we need to adjust to Micro Electric Cars, and Ultra Light Vehicles, and probably 3 star crash ratings.




Agreed, the first hurdle is to find alternative status symbols for those that need them......
Crash ratings are size relative. When a 5 star Fantasyland Cruiser collides with a 5 star Yaris, ....


agreed, two problems at least before economical EV hits the streets at mass:
1.Status: since the car is evident extension of our .....
ego.... than now is obvious problem with introducing EV popular that replace SUV but cost less then $10k
2.Elimination of the BIG vehicles - or diverting and segregating the traffic.
I am sure that smallest EV made of carbon fibre and filled with styrofoam and air bags, weighting only few hundreds kg could be made at 10 * in collision with similar vehicle or static object. By comparison nobody test even or require the most expensive limousine or SUV to match the safety in direct collision with rail truck.

3. Very soon vehicle could drive autonomously so need for driver disappear - meaning -the using auto taxi could be much cheaper then owning your vehicle.

www.edmunds.com/car-news/


Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply