Vigilanteism - Hmmm

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
TonyC
TonyC
WA
410 posts
WA, 410 posts
25 Mar 2008 9:57pm
From another forum thread it seems one of these guys may have finally met their match - well, finally got caught by someone they were ripping off - someone willing to take it further than they were - always determines the eventual outcome. [}:)]

mineral1 said...

Mr float said...

What happened ?Did the red commodore guy cop it or his victim whilst ransacking?

mineral1 said...

Looks like your friendly (not) visitor who like to remove gear from cars and such like at Woodies, and uses a red commodore, has met with one of the occupants demise according to West Australian newspaper today. Apparently in the act of attempting to ransack a dwelling in Southern Suburbs.






So the question is what drives vigilanteism - at what point is it caused? Is it when the police/councils reach a level that they don't have the resources to do their jobs properly, or the laws become so lenient that the authorities can't act as the people wish, and people believe the justice system just isn't. Or is it simply one or more reaching the point they won't allow it to happen to them any more.

Interested to see peoples responses to this.

Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
25 Mar 2008 10:36pm
I think its bad. Sure the people might deserve it. But it is not up to anyone to take the law into their own hands. Even if they are a cop they shouldn't just knock them off (I'm not suggesting it has happened), let alone an average person.
If someone thinks they can act judge and executioner person I think they should be locked up forever. (not 20years, until they are not breathing).
It might sound good stuff getting rid off the crap, but there is no proper method of determining guilt or lack of it with that method.
If you have to do what you must in self defense that is fine, or if they kill a family member and you knew it was them, I can see it from that angle. But a petty thief with no trial etc, that is wrong.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23688 posts
WA, 23688 posts
25 Mar 2008 11:02pm
Depends if the system is such that the petty thief has been caught and convicted a number of times, but has had no penalty.
By that I mean if he is caught (rarely!) he's fined, he doesn't pay the fine, no action is taken as result of non payment (suspend their driver's licence but they drive anyway or walk and don't give a sh!t).

Eventually people get very annoyed that there is no penalty.

It is like trying to train a dog but never smacking it, never suspending privileges, never rewarding good behaviour. Just saying "you should not do that" and then you go out half the day so it will not get caught barking it's head off and digging holes. Eventually the neighbours will see it in the act, know you are not doing much to fix it, and they will come over and shoot it.
cwamit
cwamit
WA
1194 posts
WA, 1194 posts
25 Mar 2008 11:09pm
Dawn Patrol said...

I think its bad. Sure the people might deserve it. But it is not up to anyone to take the law into their own hands. Even if they are a cop they shouldn't just knock them off (I'm not suggesting it has happened), let alone an average person.
If someone thinks they can act judge and executioner person I think they should be locked up forever. (not 20years, until they are not breathing).
It might sound good stuff getting rid off the crap, but there is no proper method of determining guilt or lack of it with that method.
If you have to do what you must in self defense that is fine, or if they kill a family member and you knew it was them, I can see it from that angle. But a petty thief with no trial etc, that is wrong.


so if a guy that was killed, who happened to also be a suspected ( his fingerprints on the childs rooms window) child rapist, was done in by the childs father, would that be ok?

just asking..... all becomes rather complex as the operative word here is.. "suspected"

i do think that guy would get what he had coming and one less oxygen theif (sic) in the world is a good thing. what if he was also well known around the area as a theif and had 300 prior convictions - watch the news to see what im talking about.


vigilanteism sounds nice in theory, the public returning the balance of justice and so forth but ultimatly and sadly its at the demise of everyones freedom.



hills
hills
SA
1622 posts
SA, 1622 posts
26 Mar 2008 1:20am
Different situations different answers I reckon. 2 hypothetical situations:

1. A loving father down on his luck breaks into a house to try and steel something to sell so that he can buy his young son dieing of cancer the treatment he so badly needs but can't afford.

2. A no hoper drug addict breaks into a house so he can get his next fix.

Same crime different situations. How would you feel if you shot the guy in the first situation.

I say leave justice to the judicial system and only protect yourself if you genuinely feel you or your family are in danger.
TonyC
TonyC
WA
410 posts
WA, 410 posts
26 Mar 2008 12:04am
Perhaps there are other solutions to dealing with continued repeat offenders that don’t want to obey societies laws. If they don’t want to live in our society (and thus within its laws) then don’t – bring back a penal system of transportation.

If someone repeatedly offends at something then they are ex-communicated, they lose their citizenship / residency. Give them an opportunity of finding another country that will accept them, and if they can’t (99% of the time) within a suitable timeframe (3 months) whilst incarcerated, then they get transported to a prison colony. Hmmm – maybe history should repeat. Can we find an island we can dump them on and let them survive as best they can, it would have to have a suitable exclusion zone around it where any vessels etc get destroyed if crossing. The island shouldn’t have an overcrowding problem in the long run – it would self regulate in time – remember the drosophila (fruit fly) experiments from school. Wouldn't need to worry about prison guards or any form of assistance whatsoever - leave them totally to their own survival. Give the navy some additional patrol boats and they've got plenty of real practice, when required. And no, I am not thinking of Tasmania – lol. I think as a deterrent this would cut crime considerably.

Hmmm - have I stepped over the humanist line yet.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23688 posts
WA, 23688 posts
26 Mar 2008 12:19am
Tony, similar concept:

WA needs a pipe (or covered canal) to get water from the Ord River etc to Perth. Pollies say it is too expensive. Bvllsh!t.

USA still uses chaingangs to make roads etc. In our outback there is nowhere to run to.

Make the prisoners dig the canal, and the faster you dig, faster you're out.
No more TV, pool tables, aircon prisons and footygames.
See how many want to offend then.

The worst thing WA ever did was remove "hard labour" from the sentencing act.

TonyC
TonyC
WA
410 posts
WA, 410 posts
26 Mar 2008 12:32am
You might have something there Mark. I read somewhere a few years ago that the cost of each prisoner in the system was $45,000 per annum - be interesting to see if there was a way for them to contribute somehow to WA's infrastructure, which IMO is one of WA's most important aspects of sustained development. Perhaps a number could be rehabilitated that way too, learning a trade/skills etc and contributing to society. Oh no - becoming a humanist again. [}:)]
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
26 Mar 2008 11:11am
After reading the above posters - don't forget, they have to be 'caught & convicted', trials, sentencing, appeals, and picket lines from the 'humane society' if they are sentenced to 'hard-labour'.....I don't think this will ever come back!

Just to add....(hypothetically - for legal reasons) if anyone broke into my house...and I found out who they were, and the police couldn't do their job...I'd make sure they learned a good lesson....

but....

If they hurt one of my kids....it'd be the last lesson they'd ever learn!

Basically it's an inconvenience (and most times an expensive one) when something gets stolen, and can be frustrating, but that's why the police are there - to do their job without emotion interferring! I know a few cops, most of the time they're as frustrated as we are with the system.
harrytesties
harrytesties
133 posts
133 posts
26 Mar 2008 11:57am
cops hands are tied most of the time, and its not their fault.. perfect example, returned to car after surf to disturb theives attempting to open my van window with a rock, they smashed the window, then high tailed it when they realised they were busted, i could not give immediate chase, i had to find keys and wait for mates to climb back up the hill from the surf, but i got the rego plate, and even though i was concerned it might have been a stolen car, i was optimistic that we had them this time- cars are regularly broken into at this location... so we packed up and went straight to the cop shop, gave all the details of the event and the rego plate number and was told that they'd get right on it... got a phone call a few hours later, apparently the car had NOT been reported stolen, but when interviewed upon where abouts, the theiving bastards had more witnesses saying that they'd been at home all afternoon than i had witnesses saying they'd smashed my windows, basically just me.... the cops believed my side of events, even appologised for not being able to do anything.. then told me that they even knew the suspected party were a bunch of drug farked trouble makers.... in my opinion, if you catch them, and have the ability or the back up, beat them, beat the living **** out of them
harrytesties
harrytesties
133 posts
133 posts
26 Mar 2008 12:05pm
cops hands are tied most of the time, and its not their fault.. perfect example, returned to car after surf to disturb theives attempting to open my van window with a rock, they smashed the window, then high tailed it when they realised they were busted, i could not give immediate chase, i had to find keys and wait for mates to climb back up the hill from the surf, but i got the rego plate, and even though i was concerned it might have been a stolen car, i was optimistic that we had them this time- cars are regularly broken into at this location... so we packed up and went straight to the cop shop, gave all the details of the event and the rego plate number and was told that they'd get right on it... got a phone call a few hours later, apparently the car had NOT been reported stolen, but when interviewed upon where abouts, the theiving bastards had more witnesses saying that they'd been at home all afternoon than i had witnesses saying they'd smashed my windows, basically just me.... the cops believed my side of events, even appologised for not being able to do anything.. then told me that they even knew the suspected party were a bunch of drug farked trouble makers.... in my opinion, if you catch them, and have the ability or the back up, beat them, beat the living **** out of them
DavMen
DavMen
NSW
1510 posts
NSW, 1510 posts
26 Mar 2008 3:28pm
harrytesties said...

sorry about that repeated bit... it just really gets me angry..!!!!!! no i just kept getting logged out when i tried to post, and then i realised i posted it half a dozen times......... please forgive me....



Oh I thought it was just and echo
big gill
big gill
WA
649 posts
WA, 649 posts
26 Mar 2008 6:17pm
viga a watism???????????
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
26 Mar 2008 10:31pm
There seems to be a real problem with property crime around the beaches of WA. If the police or councils won't take it seriously, why don't people use technology to fix the problem.

In this day and age, video cameras are pretty cheap. Approach the council who looks after the car park, offer to setup and maintain a security CCT. Approach car insurance companies at around the same time. See what they have to say.

Are prisons in WA filled up or what? Sydney has a bit of a bad rep for crime but honestly I have not seen any lowlifes patrolling carparks in and around Sydney.

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply