so ..... who,s the boss now?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
SandS
SandS
VIC
5904 posts
VIC, 5904 posts
22 Aug 2010 9:36pm
So what happens now? what if.....The indos start a sneak invasion? .....the french start newc testing of the coast of nz ? .. whos going to call the shots?
Australia... you were indicisive but now your not so sure.
Just dont ask B Brown what to do!!!
saltiest1
saltiest1
NSW
2575 posts
NSW, 2575 posts
22 Aug 2010 9:49pm
worst case its the gg. then the queen!!
shannon8888
shannon8888
NSW
517 posts
NSW, 517 posts
22 Aug 2010 10:29pm
hopefully not t abbs ,shandy of light anyone wtf is that even allowed
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
22 Aug 2010 10:34pm
i'd say the libs have it in the bag depending on the final count.

i can't see the 3 country independants supporting labor because of the greens connection plus all 3 are saying they want stable goverment and that to me is code for "not" gillard.

they are just playing both sides at the moment to get the very best deal for their electorate they can.

very very smart politics.

time will tell i guess.
landyacht
landyacht
WA
5921 posts
WA, 5921 posts
22 Aug 2010 9:23pm
Just saw Bob Catto , One of the" 3 Independants " having a rant on ABC news.
I got a sense that If this is as good as it gets , Australia is screwed
Maybe the idea of Queensland secesseding is not so silly
busterwa
busterwa
3782 posts
3782 posts
22 Aug 2010 9:38pm
Yep you dont have to worry about workchoices anymore when the cost of living goes thru the roof because of uncontrolled imigration
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
23 Aug 2010 1:40am
landyacht said...

Just saw Bob Catto , One of the" 3 Independants " having a rant on ABC news.
I got a sense that If this is as good as it gets , Australia is screwed
Maybe the idea of Queensland secesseding is not so silly


I am thinking that Katter and Windsor are making more sense than the rest of them combined.

They are both talking about "stable government". Without that you do not get investment, without that you do not get economic growth and without that you do not get general well being of the populace.

The secession movement has been strong in Queensland in the past as it has been in Western Australia, particularly in Kalgoorlie.

One place of particularly sensational secession success is the "Hutt River Province" which at one point in time declared war against Australia and after a suitable amount of time during which Australia offered no resistance, declared itself victor of that war.

Maybe it is time to abolish "party politics" and require all parliamentary representatives be independant (or dependant on their constituents) so as to give true representation of the people and have a government of the people, for the people (not the multi nationals) by the people.

For the third federal election in a row I performed the civic duty of being a scrutineer at a polling place on Saturday. I have done it once for a Liberal, Labor and National candidate respectively. One can do it as a private citizen also I believe.

I also handed out "how to vote cards" for our local National (Coalition) Party representative from noon till 6 when polling closed.

Some of you younger guys should do this. You are guaranteed to learn something and it will probably change your attitude about politics and your view of the voting process.

At the less busy polling places you get the opportunity to chat with the guys on the other side of the political fence. They are actually humans too!!

Hope we are not getting too political for you here green room.

SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
23 Aug 2010 11:22am
SandS said...

So what happens now? what if.....The indos start a sneak invasion? .....the french start newc testing of the coast of nz ? .. whos going to call the shots?


Same situation continues as was the case before the election... Labor continues to be in charge in "caretaker" mode. That's always the case from the time an election is called until a new government is sworn in. In caretaker mode, the convention is that the existing government can do whatever is required to keep the country running as-is but they can't make any changes without the agreement of the opposition.
cranky
cranky
440 posts
440 posts
23 Aug 2010 11:08am
cisco said...

One place of particularly sensational secession success is the "Hutt River Province" which at one point in time declared war against Australia and after a suitable amount of time during which Australia offered no resistance, declared itself victor of that war.



You would barely call it a success, more a tourist sideshow.

Trivia: As a cadet at school we would bivouac at Hutt river province, one year we all lined up on the main street and a photo was taken of Prince Leonard inspecting the troops - which appeared on the front page of the Sunday times, those involved got a stern talking to by the powers that be.

Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5126 posts
VIC, 5126 posts
23 Aug 2010 1:31pm
Gestalt said...

i'd say the libs have it in the bag depending on the final count.

...


ALP have a majority in the majority of states and majority by population, and a single party vote majority.

Coalition only has a majority in QLD and WA. The QLD majority is huge. WA not so.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
23 Aug 2010 11:39am
SandS said...

So what happens now? what if.....The indos start a sneak invasion? .....the french start newc testing of the coast of nz ? .. whos going to call the shots?
Australia... you were indicisive but now your not so sure.
Just dont ask B Brown what to do!!!


Yeh - the last thing we need is the most honest, intelligent and forward thinking person in politics getting involved.

Much better to stick with the status quo of tweedledee and tweedledum (oh and the wannabetweedledees) as the options..
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
23 Aug 2010 3:05pm
Gorgo said...

Gestalt said...

i'd say the libs have it in the bag depending on the final count.

...


ALP have a majority in the majority of states and majority by population, and a single party vote majority.

Coalition only has a majority in QLD and WA. The QLD majority is huge. WA not so.


you must be watching a different election to me Gorgo. if the alp had the majority they would have power right now. but they didn't and they don't

not to say they won't but the odds are not good for them. to be honest if it wasn't for the preference system they would have already conceded.
nebbian
nebbian
WA
6277 posts
WA, 6277 posts
23 Aug 2010 2:02pm
Gestalt said...
to be honest if it wasn't for the preference system they would have already conceded.


The same could be said for the coalition...

I took GetFunky's advice and voted green. I count this result as a win
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
23 Aug 2010 4:24pm
Gestalt said...

Gorgo said...

Gestalt said...

i'd say the libs have it in the bag depending on the final count.

...


ALP have a majority in the majority of states and majority by population, and a single party vote majority.

Coalition only has a majority in QLD and WA. The QLD majority is huge. WA not so.


you must be watching a different election to me Gorgo. if the alp had the majority they would have power right now. but they didn't and they don't

not to say they won't but the odds are not good for them. to be honest if it wasn't for the preference system they would have already conceded.


I think the ALP has the Majority of seats, the majority of votes and the majority of states. But anyhow , who cares, the REAL election story is the fact that the conservatives managed to convince 50% of Australians that....(a) the Australian economy was ruined by Labor and we were worst off than all the other countries smashed by the GFC. (b)...A couple of thousand people in boats is a threat to our national security. (c) School spending is a waste of money and 3% of schools that had complaints about their buildings constituted it being described as a RORT. (D) The conservatives "Are the only party with a policy on global warming". (e) the Labor party is a nasty party because we dumped( or should I say executed,eliminated,stabbed,annihilated,assassinated ) our leader. So where does that leave us? how about this Prime minister TONY ABBOTT, deputy PM WARREN TRUSS and their adviser on all things BOB KATTER!!!!!!!!. Australia is a nice place filled with stupid people.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
23 Aug 2010 4:38pm
If Kevin was still PM ALP would have won... nobody in their right mind wants


This selection was really just a vote against the back stabber.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
23 Aug 2010 2:41pm
The bewdy of the Greens (potentially) having the BoP is that more will be likely to be achieved.

How'szat

As I see it both the majors (I tend to think of them as minors - as far as intellect and maturity goes) will need to do some pretty hefty deals with the Greens to get their own sway on things..

PLUS - and this is the kicker - when it comes time to pass a policy (e.g. on environmental or no other option to learn ethical/moral codes than from creepy blokes in dresses in our school systems), the majors can let that through to the keeper but keep their own subscribers happy by stating "Well we didn't want to but the tree huggers made us."

WIN WIN


Getting Tony the phony nice guy is def NOT a WIN though.


$$$ on Tony losing it and showing the real deal sooner, rather than later.



Says a lot that even Tony Phony's own colleagues have not stopped commending his 'control' and 'restraint' during the election run-up. They know what lurks just beneath the surface obviously.





EDIT:
Agree that Kev would have got the ALP accross the line too. If so, the Libs have not won the election - rather ALP have lost it. Talk about re-loading to blow ya other foot off!

IMO Julia would be a far more competant PM, minister and diplomatic operator tho. Phoney Tony has an extremely limited skill base (acknowledged by the Libs) and is a better internal political creature than manager as such.


Holy frijoles Nebbs! I am a bit embarrassed to be thought of as am agent for change. Listening to Bob on Sat night was uplifting from a feeling of helplessness at the state of the results. What a bloke. Bent, straight or corrugated - we need more pollies like him on all sides of politics.
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5126 posts
VIC, 5126 posts
23 Aug 2010 4:59pm
Gestalt said...
.....

you must be watching a different election to me Gorgo. if the alp had the majority they would have power right now. but they didn't and they don't

....


http://vtr.aec.gov.au/

ALP have a majority in all States except QLD and WA. Big majorities in NSW and VIC. They have a slim majority in SA. They have a 100% majority in Tas, ACT and NT but the total in those places is relatively small.

The Coalition has a substantial majority in WA and a landslide in QLD.

So in terms of a "... the people have spoken..." the people in general have clearly stated a preference for the ALP. Queenslanders, on the other hand, have bellowed "...*** off Gillard and all your mates (or more likely Bligh).

frant
frant
VIC
1230 posts
VIC, 1230 posts
23 Aug 2010 5:05pm
I think its time for everyone to take a deep breath and stand back...... your team did not win!!!!
The people have spoken and our future is now in the hands of the three independents and they will determine the outcome. No amount of we won this or they lost that is going to change the fact that neither side won.
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5126 posts
VIC, 5126 posts
23 Aug 2010 5:23pm
frant said...

I think its time for everyone to take a deep breath and stand back...... your team did not win!!!!


Nobody said they did. We're just having a discussion and pointing out the results.

frant said...The people have spoken and our future is now in the hands of the three independents and they will determine the outcome. No amount of we won this or they lost that is going to change the fact that neither side won.


Our future is in the hands of the independents and whoever can negotiate a deal with them. On the current counting the ALP has a slight edge.

The Greens MP has expressed a preference for Labour but Bob Brown has said they will talk to anybody.

Katter and Windsor have heaped scorn and derision on the Nationals in general and Barnaby Joyce in particular. They may link up with their former conservative playmates ... or not.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
23 Aug 2010 5:26pm
log man said...

Gestalt said...

Gorgo said...

Gestalt said...

i'd say the libs have it in the bag depending on the final count.

...


ALP have a majority in the majority of states and majority by population, and a single party vote majority.

Coalition only has a majority in QLD and WA. The QLD majority is huge. WA not so.


you must be watching a different election to me Gorgo. if the alp had the majority they would have power right now. but they didn't and they don't

not to say they won't but the odds are not good for them. to be honest if it wasn't for the preference system they would have already conceded.


I think the ALP has the Majority of seats, the majority of votes and the majority of states. But anyhow , who cares, the REAL election story is the fact that the conservatives managed to convince 50% of Australians that....(a) the Australian economy was ruined by Labor and we were worst off than all the other countries smashed by the GFC. (b)...A couple of thousand people in boats is a threat to our national security. (c) School spending is a waste of money and 3% of schools that had complaints about their buildings constituted it being described as a RORT. (D) The conservatives "Are the only party with a policy on global warming". (e) the Labor party is a nasty party because we dumped( or should I say executed,eliminated,stabbed,annihilated,assassinated ) our leader. So where does that leave us? how about this Prime minister TONY ABBOTT, deputy PM WARREN TRUSS and their adviser on all things BOB KATTER!!!!!!!!. Australia is a nice place filled with stupid people.


it would be good to keep these things based on facts and not base our views on party propaganda.

the FACT is that at this point in time labor have not got the majority of votes. if they did they would be in power.

the other fact is that the protest vote against labor went to the greens who received the majority of the swing against labor. because we work on a preferential system that requires a 50% majority all of those "protest votes" went straight to labor in the majority of cases and some instances it was 20% of the vote. no real protest there hey? and the percentage was in some cases 5-6 times what the libs got through preferences. the protest vote is about the senate. at this time in our political system the only way we can achieve a 3 party system is to give the greens the balance of power in the senate. in the lower house there are still only 2 main parties.

school projects were a joke. i was involved in it. were you? where does 3% come from?

what climate change policy did labor have. that was their biggest broken promise. it failed because the greens voted against it in the senate. so the people most likely to protect the climate said the labor policy wasn't workable. hmm.....

the libs didn't need to bags labor so much. ever wonder why labor wanted to "move forward" , why they didn't talk about their record over the previous 3 years? here is what julia said when she took over from kevin.
1 - " I asked my colleagues to make a leadership change because I believed that a good government was losing its way."

and on and on. you can spin it whatever way you want but the real story is that labor had a swing of 6-10 percent against it which is massive.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
23 Aug 2010 5:29pm
frant said...

I think its time for everyone to take a deep breath and stand back...... your team did not win!!!!
The people have spoken and our future is now in the hands of the three independents and they will determine the outcome. No amount of we won this or they lost that is going to change the fact that neither side won.


our future isn't in the hands of 3 independants. that's why we have a senate. we are probably in a better position now than we were before the elections.

finally the major parties will take the environment serious, finally we will have real debate about the issues and hopefully we will eventually have 3 parties in the lower house.

now that's democratic.
SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
23 Aug 2010 5:49pm
At the risk of injecting some facts into this thread - from the AEC's website as of now:

House of Reps Two Party Preferred results:
Australian Labor Party 5,060,285
Liberal/National Coalition 4,929,004

Historically, it wouldn't be the first time a party got the majority of votes but didn't win office. And the seat count could go 73/73. I don't see how any side can claim a victory, or that the "other side" lost.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
23 Aug 2010 5:49pm
Gorgo said...

Gestalt said...
.....

you must be watching a different election to me Gorgo. if the alp had the majority they would have power right now. but they didn't and they don't

....


http://vtr.aec.gov.au/

ALP have a majority in all States except QLD and WA. Big majorities in NSW and VIC. They have a slim majority in SA. They have a 100% majority in Tas, ACT and NT but the total in those places is relatively small.

The Coalition has a substantial majority in WA and a landslide in QLD.

So in terms of a "... the people have spoken..." the people in general have clearly stated a preference for the ALP. Queenslanders, on the other hand, have bellowed "...*** off Gillard and all your mates (or more likely Bligh).




gorgo, our federal system is based on the whole of australia not just the resulkt in each state. that is how the americans do it. not us.

here is information about the electorates and why redistributions occur.

www.aec.gov.au/Electorates/Redistributions/Overview.htm
poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
23 Aug 2010 3:59pm
My wife is still the boss.
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5126 posts
VIC, 5126 posts
23 Aug 2010 6:19pm
Gestalt said...
...
gorgo, our federal system is based on the whole of australia not just the resulkt in each state. that is how the americans do it. not us.

...



That is not in question.

We know what the outcome is. It's all over the papers as far as hung parliaments and independents and minority governments etc.

In terms of reading the results, on a State-by-State basis and on a population basis the ALP got the most votes and the most seats everywhere except WA and QLD.

I haven't done the math but I'm guessing that if you exclude QLD then the ALP would win.

In short, the voters of QLD have created the current situation for whatever reasons they have. The rest of us may as well have stayed at home.

I'm guessing whoever forms the minority government will be very nice to the independents and the Greens and then start greasing up to QLD (a lot) and WA.
mineral1
mineral1
WA
4564 posts
WA, 4564 posts
23 Aug 2010 4:27pm
Hopefully in the end we get a good result for the Australian voters.
But I tell you what convinced me (a swinging voter) that the conservatives were a dishonest bunch that would resort to any means to regain power was the "Ute Gate" issue.
The people responsible for that little fiasco on the conservative side, Abott included as he was a shadow minister, should be done for treason, and removed from office permanently.
There can be any spin what so ever put on that little effort, but in the end, if it barks like a hyena, looks like a hyena, then its probably a hyena
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
23 Aug 2010 6:40pm
Gestalt, Some other guy is correct as per The AEC figures the two party preferred numbers are correct. also your assertion that " if the labor party had got the majority of the votes they would be in" is incorrect . A majority of votes is incidental to winning an election.The number of seats is the thing. Oh, and the Building the education revolution question. You asked where the complaint figure came from . The BER review interim report released by the government about 2 weeks ago said the complaints figure from schools principals and or school governing bodies was aprox 2.73%. It included complaints ranging from poor work, overpriced buildings, wrong location of buildings, even wrong colours. I'm not saying that 98 % of the schools are compleley happy but 2.73% is not A RORT. It just goes to show you that when the Herald Sun/Today tonight/ACA get their teeth into it the truth comes off second best.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
23 Aug 2010 6:58pm
I forgot, Gestalt, Please don't tell me the liberals have a creditable policy on global warming that is a complete and utter. the conservative parties are full of deniers, that's how and why Turnbull was removed(assassinated,knifed,stabbed.....?) for Abbott. Do you really think reducing emissions is high on his list of priorities. The suggestion that Abbott, Minchin, and the the Nationals care about the environment and global warming is utterly wrong.
GalahOnTheBay
GalahOnTheBay
NSW
4188 posts
NSW, 4188 posts
23 Aug 2010 7:20pm
Maybe next time Laurie should run...

poor relative said...

My wife is still the boss.


lol
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
23 Aug 2010 7:32pm
@ gorgo

well if the rest of the states stayed at home then the conservatives would of got into power so i guess the system does work.

you are saying that the people voted, the result was 50/50 but someone should get a majority because some of the states are labor. it makes very liitle sense and not democratic. regardless of distribution of results the result is that it's 50/50.

and on your last point. rather than blame the voters of QLD and WA how about you level the result at the feet of the politicians.

or those that did donkey votes, or the preferential system or whatever. it doesn't matter in the end.

@ logman

and again, your being semantic. labor did not get the majority of votes which is why it's 50/50 that's the way it works and as you said incidental. so all of the rubbish about labor getting the majority of votes/states or whatever is a moot point. as is the libs line that they got the majority of the primary vote, which they did. it doesn't work that way.

your point about the schools debacle. the "interim" report is points out that they visited 110 schools across 5 states and goes on to say. off the top of my head there were 8000 schools or something in total. not a large percentage.
Over 400 projects are now entered however there are very small sample sizes for certain project types and some education authorities. This causes early output volatility and restricts definitive conclusions. Results at this stage may indicate a trend but the current sample size is inadequate to make conclusive findings. The November 2010 report will have a significantly larger sample size
and allow for robust conclusions.


plus one of the finding of the anao report from the auditor general was
"While designed to give effect to the objective of the stimulus package, the approach adopted by the department has reduced the capacity of school systems to take account of system priorities and the differing needs of schools in their systems, within the Australian Governmentfs policy parameters for the program. Additionally, some of the administrative arrangements put in place by the department were unduly complicated and time]consuming for Education Authorities"

will be interesting to see what the final report says.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14969 posts
QLD, 14969 posts
23 Aug 2010 7:41pm
log man said...

I forgot, Gestalt, Please don't tell me the liberals have a creditable policy on global warming that is a complete and utter. the conservative parties are full of deniers, that's how and why Turnbull was removed(assassinated,knifed,stabbed.....?) for Abbott. Do you really think reducing emissions is high on his list of priorities. The suggestion that Abbott, Minchin, and the the Nationals care about the environment and global warming is utterly wrong.


read my posts again logman. at what point did i say anything about the libs view on climate change. it is clear that you are so pro labor that you are just making assumptions of what i think.

unlike you i vote based on informed policy and not party propoganda.

there are a few in this thread in shock that labor got it's ass kicked. sucked it up. democracy won.

maybe labor will get the number and maybe they won't

unl
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply