A more quantitative measure of kite performance.

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
thestig
thestig
NSW
22 posts
NSW, 22 posts
26 Jan 2012 10:56pm
You'll probably guess from the ignorance of the rest of this post but I'm no Aerospace Engineer. That said, there's seems to be no way of quantitatively describing the characteristics and performance of both kites and boards.

I understand that aerodynamics is very complex and still an area of research but is there not a way that a kite can be described mores systematically than, "it turns pretty fast" or relaunch is "easier than pulling Jessica Alba but harder than tying your shoelace"?

Thoughts?

For example, cars are rated by their fuel consumption, 0-100 time and top speed. Could there not be a some sort of standardised tests?
TurtleHunter
TurtleHunter
WA
1675 posts
WA, 1675 posts
26 Jan 2012 8:55pm
probably not. Like cars there is a huge difference in the feel of different models. I drive a landcruiser and I sure as hell didn't buy it for the fuel consumption or speed
thestig
thestig
NSW
22 posts
NSW, 22 posts
27 Jan 2012 12:10am
Yeah but for a four wheel drive you'd use a different metric such as departure angle, ramp over or wheel articulation.

Big eeeZeee
Big eeeZeee
NSW
1100 posts
NSW, 1100 posts
27 Jan 2012 12:16am
try the search. this topic has been covered
Skid
Skid
QLD
1499 posts
QLD, 1499 posts
26 Jan 2012 11:55pm
Some people are using quantitative measures....

"This kite turns like a 7, but has the power of 14 and is like a 4 to pump up!"
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
26 Jan 2012 10:08pm
Just pimp it...

mitch88
mitch88
NSW
271 posts
NSW, 271 posts
27 Jan 2012 1:18am
just got myself a 2012 10m rebel. man what a kite! she's going in for a dyno next week ill let you know....
greenleader
greenleader
QLD
5283 posts
QLD, 5283 posts
27 Jan 2012 12:38am
sheets of fabric that pull you along.
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
26 Jan 2012 11:34pm
mitch88 said...

just got myself a 2012 10m rebel. man what a kite! she's going in for a dyno next week ill let you know....


PERFECT PIMPING... So much better than the 2011 I bet... It's got a new doover-lacky and a thingemy watchit...
Underoath
Underoath
QLD
2434 posts
QLD, 2434 posts
27 Jan 2012 2:52am
Pugwash said...

mitch88 said...

just got myself a 2012 10m rebel. man what a kite! she's going in for a dyno next week ill let you know....


PERFECT PIMPING... So much better than the 2011 I bet... It's got a new doover-lacky and a thingemy watchit...


And ****ter colors
wdric
wdric
NSW
1625 posts
NSW, 1625 posts
27 Jan 2012 7:29am
thestig said...

Yeah but for a four wheel drive you'd use a different metric such as departure angle, ramp over or wheel articulation.



Dont worry about any of this metric stuff.

The best way is to just get out there.
When you come back have a look in the mirror and see what size smile you have.
This will be the best measurement you can use

Craig66
Craig66
NSW
2466 posts
NSW, 2466 posts
27 Jan 2012 7:55am
wdric said...

thestig said...

Yeah but for a four wheel drive you'd use a different metric such as departure angle, ramp over or wheel articulation.



Dont worry about any of this metric stuff.

The best way is to just get out there.
When you come back have a look in the mirror and see what size smile you have.
This will be the best measurement you can use




So true Ric, it all about your own smile, and not other peoples opions.

PS Mitch, can you get a chip up grade while getting your Rebel dynoed?????

My new woman, Argo was jeolous when i had a go on your girl

SaveTheWhales
SaveTheWhales
WA
1913 posts
WA, 1913 posts
27 Jan 2012 5:53am
thestick

Sorry to burst your bubble of joyous kite development..... if youve read a few posts on here, it will become very apparent that the same few people seem reply yay or nay to what they think is good/valid info followed by a whole bunch of dribble - easy marketing targets

So as far as getting a standard from kite companys - they just happen to market / make up all sorts of crap - to hype their gear for $$$ sales...

see the pattern formed..

Let talk a walk down kite memory Lane

"Our new model has better bottom end, more Plop, fast turning and top end power than the previous model" what a load of CRAP

If the above were true, after 8+ years of any major kite company being in business - the kite should be able to pull you at a 1000mph, jump to the freakn Moon and do turning tricks faster than a prostitute

Sadly the good natured faith you have will be better utilised in taking the so called Ferarri's (ooohhh ) of kites for demos before buying - to realise your actually riding a Hyundai Getz in drag

The more you Demo - the more the truth becomes 'Very' apparent... that there can be no standard

Saffer
Saffer
VIC
4501 posts
VIC, 4501 posts
27 Jan 2012 10:12am
Until people are forced to take a lie detector before submitting reviews, all reviews are going to be 50% bull. the only thing you can probably accept is that is may be the best kite they've ever used because they came from an older kite which is likely to have worse performance, a stretched canopy etc.
Smithy
Smithy
VIC
859 posts
VIC, 859 posts
27 Jan 2012 10:20am
Maybe after working this one out the same gurus can come up with a definitive way of scoring tricks in competitions......
blueprint
blueprint
WA
321 posts
WA, 321 posts
27 Jan 2012 8:26am
Saffer said...

Until people are forced to take a lie detector before submitting reviews, all reviews are going to be 50% bull. the only thing you can probably accept is that is may be the best kite they've ever used because they came from an older kite which is likely to have worse performance, a stretched canopy etc.


Harsh to call peoples reviews BS but in some ways I agree, the problem with quantitaive measures is that is only half the story, how do you measure the "feel"of a kite.

You can take the exact same kite change one piece of the bridle and it will maybe still have the same power but will fly deeper or further forward in the window, be heavier or lighter on the bar or some other thing that totally changes your opnion of the kite. I like a good nerd up and I think it'd be interesting to have some more meaningful measures of kites but the reality is you can't cover it all meaningfully.

I have heard some talk from one brand recently regarding instrumenting a bar to measure some of this stuff which I think would be really good to look at but it doesn't solve that companies still need to market or that there's more to this than numbers and measurement.
Puetz
Puetz
NT
2186 posts
NT, 2186 posts
27 Jan 2012 10:23am
... I seem to remember a few years ago some euro kite mag did some tests where they put a kite in the air and had it tied to the back of a ute with a pressure guage, then drove the ute at a constant speed (upwind) while a rider moved the bar in/out etc. I vaguely remember it was when the 'bow' kite revolution started and 100% depower was the key. Anyway, I think they some how measured power by the weight pressure that they got.

I like a nerd fest too and I would like to see some numbers. It might help chosing or narrowing down what kites you wanna try which can be difficult when you have limited access to other brands. And it might be for the fun of it too.

Smile factor can be brought into dispute when describing kites performance 'cause what is one mans love is anothers hate, 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' sort of stuff. I like lots of power with a bit of bar pressure on a twin tip, this could be a strapless surfers nightmare, so does that make the kite no good, bad or ugly (North still win on the ugly IMO).

Anyway, its all ment to be fun.

cheers for now,

Robbie
au_rick
au_rick
WA
752 posts
WA, 752 posts
27 Jan 2012 9:16am
Puetz said...

... I seem to remember a few years ago some euro kite mag did some tests where they put a kite in the air and had it tied to the back of a ute with a pressure guage, then drove the ute at a constant speed (upwind) while a rider moved the bar in/out etc. I vaguely remember it was when the 'bow' kite revolution started and 100% depower was the key. Anyway, I think they some how measured power by the weight pressure that they got.

I like a nerd fest too and I would like to see some numbers. It might help chosing or narrowing down what kites you wanna try which can be difficult when you have limited access to other brands. And it might be for the fun of it too.

Smile factor can be brought into dispute when describing kites performance 'cause what is one mans love is anothers hate, 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' sort of stuff. I like lots of power with a bit of bar pressure on a twin tip, this could be a strapless surfers nightmare, so does that make the kite no good, bad or ugly (North still win on the ugly IMO).

Anyway, its all ment to be fun.

cheers for now,

Robbie


would seem that this type of test that quantifies "pull" at a set wind speed would be definitive.
You'd neet to measure the pull at the chicken loop and on the bar to quantify "feedback", but the turning speed and "feel" might be a bit more dificult ?
nosmas
nosmas
WA
53 posts
WA, 53 posts
27 Jan 2012 9:20am
Skid said...

Some people are using quantitative measures....

"This kite turns like a 7, but has the power of 14 and is like a 4 to pump up!"


What colours do your kite come in?
thestig
thestig
NSW
22 posts
NSW, 22 posts
27 Jan 2012 12:31pm
Puetz said...

...

I like a nerd fest too and I would like to see some numbers. It might help chosing or narrowing down what kites you wanna try which can be difficult when you have limited access to other brands. And it might be for the fun of it too.



I agree. Its not like I'm suggesting we should have a system that would let you buy a kite sight unseen but if you had a few more numbers then (with so many brands popping up) you could narrow it down a bit. You wouldn't buy a car just because you saw that it did 0-100 in 4 seconds because you don't get an idea of the feel. But if you're looking for a fast car, you'd make a shortlist of all the ones with that kind of acceleration and then try them out for feel.

How am I going to tell if trying out a Stabber is even worth it?
bigmark100
bigmark100
NSW
584 posts
NSW, 584 posts
27 Jan 2012 12:32pm
There are just too many variables that come into play when testing a kites performance. User level, board, tide, choppy, gusty , to name a few.
Only when a completely stable environment is created, then this might be possible.
Andrash
Andrash
WA
637 posts
WA, 637 posts
27 Jan 2012 12:12pm
There was a thread some months ago about the topic:
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Kitesurfing/General/Kite-surface-area/

Many leading manufacturers still handle simple technical info (like surface area, projected area, aspect ration, drag / pull ratio, etc) as top secret, and some of them outright lie about even their kite sizes. They replace all that info with hype. I can understand this for a certain degree in a competitive industry. What is difficult to grasp why so many kiters have an aversion to the technical details and they rather go with the hype. They cannot demo 20-30 different kites in various conditions, so eventually they rely on a few honest reviews and the hype.

In response to the above thread only one manufacturer gave out their specs. This secrecy is unknown in other industries like mountain biking, trail biking, sports cars and so on, where transparency is favorable, and the riders like to know what they ride, not only feel it
pro merc
pro merc
NSW
300 posts
NSW, 300 posts
27 Jan 2012 3:38pm
it would be easy if performance was as cut and dried as a car or motorbike, the problem i see is skill. give one kite to 2 different riders and one loves it and the other thinks its so so, is it the kites fault?

generally no, most brands out there these days are decent to excellent. judging if a kite is right for you depends on how it feels for your style of riding.
Plummet
Plummet
4862 posts
4862 posts
27 Jan 2012 1:59pm
The only quantatative measure that matters is GF.

Grin Factor.

For this we can use the grinfactometer.

Goes like this.

F@#$%Sh!t i'm selling this peice of shiit right now!
Scowl ggrr this kite is crappola.
Frown: Hmm not feeling the love
Expressionless kites ok but i'm abit bored. maybe i'm underpowered?
Smirk Not bad... having abit of fun.
Grin this fun... Nice!
FBG F@KN Big grin yeah!
The wholey grail FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArk yeah !whoot holla scream....
Plummet
Plummet
4862 posts
4862 posts
27 Jan 2012 2:04pm
Now the trick is to correctly match the kite to the conditions.

you can very easily go from to juts by putting the wrong kite in teh sky for the conditions.....

my speed 3 gets a for stupid jumps and glides but a for wave riding. my reo is in the waves but for air time....

horses for courses.
Andrash
Andrash
WA
637 posts
WA, 637 posts
27 Jan 2012 2:25pm
Plummet said...

Now the trick is to correctly match the kite to the conditions.

you can very easily go from to juts by putting the wrong kite in teh sky for the conditions.....

my speed 3 gets a for stupid jumps and glides but a for wave riding. my reo is in the waves but for air time....

horses for courses.


Do you know why?
blueprint
blueprint
WA
321 posts
WA, 321 posts
27 Jan 2012 2:35pm
Plummet said...

The only quantatative measure that matters is GF.

Grin Factor.

For this we can use the grinfactometer.

Goes like this.

F@#$%Sh!t i'm selling this peice of shiit right now!
Scowl ggrr this kite is crappola.
Frown: Hmm not feeling the love
Expressionless kites ok but i'm abit bored. maybe i'm underpowered?
Smirk Not bad... having abit of fun.
Grin this fun... Nice!
FBG F@KN Big grin yeah!
The wholey grail FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArk yeah !whoot holla scream....


I kind of relate some of this to surfboards, I have a board at the moment that the first time I rode it my response was somewhere between frown/scowl but persisted with it and a few surfs later some playing with fins and I loved it (still do and am still working it out as well). I think this experience is also true of kites, my current kite has the same story as the surfboard above I guess in both cases the style/skill level required to get them to work meant I needed to adapt/learn, once I had this sorted I was rewarded for it with gear that well.....whatever does it for you (hoot holla scream or otherwise).

Obviousy this isn't always the case but it's worth understanding why if you don't like something.
Plummet
Plummet
4862 posts
4862 posts
27 Jan 2012 2:52pm
Andrash said...

Plummet said...

Now the trick is to correctly match the kite to the conditions.

you can very easily go from to juts by putting the wrong kite in teh sky for the conditions.....

my speed 3 gets a for stupid jumps and glides but a for wave riding. my reo is in the waves but for air time....

horses for courses.


Do you know why?


Of course i do!... do you wish me to bore you with explicit reasoning behind my quiver?
Andrash
Andrash
WA
637 posts
WA, 637 posts
27 Jan 2012 3:58pm
Plummet said...

Andrash said...

Plummet said...

Now the trick is to correctly match the kite to the conditions.

you can very easily go from to juts by putting the wrong kite in teh sky for the conditions.....

my speed 3 gets a for stupid jumps and glides but a for wave riding. my reo is in the waves but for air time....

horses for courses.


Do you know why?


Of course i do!... do you wish me to bore you with explicit reasoning behind my quiver?


... sure I do, I may learn something... why the speed 3 has such glide, and the reo has hang time etc...
PBR
PBR
WA
7 posts
PBR PBR
WA, 7 posts
27 Jan 2012 5:20pm
Noth is hiring this guy for thier 2013 add campaign. He should be just what you're looking for...

mywisdom
mywisdom
WA
258 posts
WA, 258 posts
27 Jan 2012 5:39pm
i dont see how they could improve the 2012's non reversible turmie pipe connection to the differential girdle spring on the upper end of the grannies.. or what ever he said..
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply