How many Kiters in Australia

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
specimen
specimen
WA
221 posts
WA, 221 posts
23 Oct 2008 9:50am
Just wondering if somebody out there in cyber kiteing world would know how many kite surfers are in Australia and how many shops per state. Or how I could get that data /information

Cheers
flapjack
flapjack
WA
78 posts
WA, 78 posts
23 Oct 2008 11:39am
too many
manicskier
manicskier
VIC
772 posts
VIC, 772 posts
23 Oct 2008 3:02pm
you could search for the kiteshops, most would be online

and you could guestimate the population, might help with data from shops sales if they are available somehow and/or AKSA and the state associations, or search on www.kiteforum.com it might have been discussed there

that'll get ya started
sunseeker
sunseeker
QLD
1203 posts
QLD, 1203 posts
23 Oct 2008 2:12pm
This information is from March this year relating to the worldwide kite sales in 2007:

_____________________________________________
Just read in the gear reviews section that about 130 000 kites were sold last year from all manufacturers - these are from Alex Shogren, founder of Best

2007
Kites sold worldwide +/- 130,000

Market share in terms of number of kites sold
Best 22%
Cabrinha 18%
North 12%
Naish and Slingshot +/- 8%

The rest make up 40%, none of which have more than approx. 4%, except Takoon with approx. 5%.

So, if kites retail at an average of $1800, then the kite industry alone is worth $234 million. Not to mention boards, harnesses, spares and holidays.
______________________________________

So try and work out how many kitesurfers there are in Aus by looking at kite locations and cities around the world and then work out what percentage Australia has. My initial guess would be 5% so that would mean 6500 new kites sold in Aus last year which would mean maybe 7000 to 8000 kitesurfers?
puppetonastring
puppetonastring
WA
3619 posts
WA, 3619 posts
23 Oct 2008 1:28pm
Good question and a clever guestimate sunseeker.
AKSA membership nos for 08/09 were around 1500 kiters but we have no way of knowing what percentage of kiters subscribe. All we can be certain of is that uninsured kiters pose the greatest unnecessary threat to beach access our sport presents.
Any bad incident anywhere; ie one where a member of the public is severely injured by coming in contact with a kite or kiter; raises the risk of local bureauracies considering bans. But if we have one where the local council or state govt is pursued for damages which will happen when the kiter isnt insured then councils all around the country will immediately respond by looking at getting kiters out of harms way. That means designated kite areas like jet-ski areas & dog beaches!
$65 for a whole season of insurance plus whatever extras your local state affiliate offers is NOTHING compared to the personal risk & the risk you are subjecting every kiter to. Enrolment time is NOW for a full year of membership. Contact your state affiliated KSA for membership details. There is one in every state including Tasmania for the first time this year.
If you have any trouble finding info then you can ask via [email protected]
O
O
VIC
118 posts
O O
VIC, 118 posts
23 Oct 2008 5:03pm
Insurance seems a bit off the topic, but you need to remember AKSA doesnt provide world wide cover so you cant expect everyone to join AKSA - I had to join IKO to get covered for riding in Hawaii for example.
brucex
brucex
QLD
701 posts
QLD, 701 posts
23 Oct 2008 4:08pm
Interesting stats

My thoughts would be that Australia stats might look something like this

Market share in terms of number of kites sold -
Best 22% ------Australia - 10%

Cabrinha 18% -------Australia - 15%

North 12% ---------Australia - $10%


Naish ---------------Australia - 7%

and Slingshot ------Australia - 13%

others - would be about 30% - 45%

What do other people think the Aus market would look like ?????

I have a great second question -
Waht does it take for a seasoned rider to switch off their favourite brand to another brand. Most of my friends seem to keep sticking to their same brand each year which means Best did a great job to go from 0 to 22% in 3 years.

So what would it take for you to change Brands????


sandman
sandman
WA
432 posts
WA, 432 posts
23 Oct 2008 3:29pm
the first brand would have to piss me off and therefore lose my loyalty. then another brand would have to be waiting in the shadows to swoop in and console me with promises of free drinks and a cheap kite.:)
jkiter
jkiter
QLD
139 posts
QLD, 139 posts
23 Oct 2008 5:37pm
flapjack is right.... too damn many
poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
23 Oct 2008 3:40pm
So what would it take for you to change Brands????


Its the gear that makes my decision.
I try as many kites as i can throughout the season.
The one i like the best i buy.
Last year it was North, this year its Ozone, who knows next year.....Bring on kitestock.

Narrowing your choice to one brand is stupid IMO
ianmac
ianmac
WA
267 posts
WA, 267 posts
23 Oct 2008 9:59pm
i started off with Cabrinha kites and have now gone over to Ozone after watching a mate use his with great ease,
i think as your skill improves or style changes the kite demand varies, i one thing i have learnt so far, there is no thing as a cheap good kite you gotta spend the bucks and i agree bring on kitestock any news on bookings yet?
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
24 Oct 2008 10:45am
puppetonastring said...
Any bad incident anywhere; ie one where a member of the public is severely injured by coming in contact with a kite or kiter; raises the risk of local bureauracies considering bans. But if we have one where the local council or state govt is pursued for damages which will happen when the kiter isnt insured then councils all around the country will immediately respond by looking at getting kiters out of harms way.




Why would the local council be pursued for damages following a bad kite incident ?
I would have thought that the kiter at fault (whether insured or uninsured)....
would be the party to sue for damages.
RayQ
RayQ
WA
638 posts
WA, 638 posts
24 Oct 2008 11:49am
O said...

Insurance seems a bit off the topic, but you need to remember AKSA doesnt provide world wide cover so you cant expect everyone to join AKSA - I had to join IKO to get covered for riding in Hawaii for example.


Well AKSA is world wide cover exept for USA and who would want to kite there anyway?

Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
24 Oct 2008 12:06pm
RayQ said...

O said...

Insurance seems a bit off the topic, but you need to remember AKSA doesnt provide world wide cover so you cant expect everyone to join AKSA - I had to join IKO to get covered for riding in Hawaii for example.


Well AKSA is world wide cover exept for USA and who would want to kite there anyway?





Hey Ray,

It's not so much would you want to, but more can you afford to with the dollar at 65c. Hawaii is nice but it is a rich persons destination again now.

Every kiter should be insured with AKSA or if you are in WA, WAKSA (same same anyway).

It just makes sense and is the responsible thing to do. You never know when a line may snap and send you and/or your kite careening off out of control into the general public.

Good winds,


Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
24 Oct 2008 4:20pm
So what would it take for you to change Brands????


1.better performance

2.Service and availability

3. Price

I was a brand slut for a couple of years. Changed brands more than I changed undies. Then someone gave me a loan of the brand I fly now and I fell in love with the performance, and the distributor fell over himself to give me service.

Price was the last consideration.

I have been on the same kites for 18 months now and would only change if the performance was matched, if I received the same service and if they were cheaper.

au_rick
au_rick
WA
752 posts
WA, 752 posts
24 Oct 2008 3:40pm
Kitehard said...

RayQ said...

O said...

Insurance seems a bit off the topic, but you need to remember AKSA doesnt provide world wide cover so you cant expect everyone to join AKSA - I had to join IKO to get covered for riding in Hawaii for example.


Well AKSA is world wide cover exept for USA and who would want to kite there anyway?






Hey Ray,

It's not so much would you want to, but more can you afford to with the dollar at 65c. Hawaii is nice but it is a rich persons destination again now.

Every kiter should be insured with AKSA or if you are in WA, WAKSA (same same anyway).

It just makes sense and is the responsible thing to do. You never know when a line may snap and send you and/or your kite careening off out of control into the general public.

Good winds,






I think you'll find that to be sued by someone, they will have to prove negligence.
If you are kiting responsibly and have an equipment failure, that's gonna be a bit hard to prove !

GranG
GranG
WA
260 posts
WA, 260 posts
24 Oct 2008 11:39pm




I think you'll find that to be sued by someone, they will have to prove negligence.
If you are kiting responsibly and have an equipment failure, that's gonna be a bit hard to prove !




mmm... probably never been the other side of a legal writ? Proving is nothing compared to sitting the other side of due legal process...

I agree, I'd rather have the insurance lawyers fight it out, rather than me... besides, if I hurt someone through accident or fault, I'd feel very guilty...

Last note - maintenance is a very tough topic... Is a 1 / 2 / 3 year old kite in good shape...

PS: on the kite stats, I sadly know a few people with newish kites sitting in their garages... forever: technically kiters, but not really
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
25 Oct 2008 10:01am
puppetonastring said...
AKSA membership nos for 08/09 were around 1500 kiters but we have no way of knowing what percentage of kiters subscribe.


That's 1500 kiters in membership out of a possible 8000.
I'd blame non-creative marketing for that poor result.
Maybe WAKSA's fear and loathing campaign doesn't work too well.
Try my free t-shirt idea....
it's worth a shot.

owieb
owieb
WA
158 posts
WA, 158 posts
25 Oct 2008 2:44pm
waveslave said...
That's 1500 kiters in membership out of a possible 8000.
I'd blame non-creative marketing for that poor result.
Maybe WAKSA's fear and loathing campaign doesn't work too well.
Try my free t-shirt idea....
it's worth a shot.


So 'slave, your criticism of WAKSA is based on what exactly?

Care to share your figures and logic for us?

Where do you get the 8000 kiters from?

How many of those 8000 live in WA, so would be eligible to join WAKSA?

The 1500 AKSA members (Australia wide), how many of those are members of WAKSA?

What percentage of WA kiters are WAKSA members?

Be interesting to see some real facts rather than your assumptions.....
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
25 Oct 2008 5:37pm
I've been watching this forum for sometime now and it's always the same posters who seem to knock WAKSA & AKSA when the opportunity arises.

Sour grapes? Jealous? Insecure? or other agenda?

I reckon you're getting your $85 worth so STFU or get off your lazy whinging arses and volunteer.


BigAirPaul
BigAirPaul
QLD
140 posts
QLD, 140 posts
25 Oct 2008 10:08pm
Never fails to amaze me when people try and 'knock' others who have their best interests at heart ! $65 is a bargain... Solidarity counts... And you get a cool tag for your harness !!!
I know that the local KSA in Dubai managed to get kiting un-banned... twice - hard to believe, but they did it. Okay, so the Pres there was on a mission 'cos he really wanted to be able to kite there, but it got done due to a united voice...
Now much as we would all like to be 'free spirits' drifting where the wind takes us, at some point we all have to realise that we are not in a kitsurfing dvd and that unfortunately there are other people that might like to use our beaches and those kites (and lines) can do some serious damage.
It may sound 'old' but stepping up and acting responsibly could save our collective asses one day...
How ever many there are, they should all support their local KSA and AKSA...
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
25 Oct 2008 8:11pm
owieb said...

waveslave said...
That's 1500 kiters in membership out of a possible 8000.
I'd blame non-creative marketing for that poor result.
Maybe WAKSA's fear and loathing campaign doesn't work too well.
Try my free t-shirt idea....
it's worth a shot.


So 'slave, your criticism of WAKSA is based on what exactly?

Care to share your figures and logic for us?

Where do you get the 8000 kiters from?

How many of those 8000 live in WA, so would be eligible to join WAKSA?

The 1500 AKSA members (Australia wide), how many of those are members of WAKSA?

What percentage of WA kiters are WAKSA members?



Good question, Owieb. ^^^
Puppet, the President of WAKSA could tell you the number of WAKSA members.
The total number of kiters in WA (members & non-members) can only be estimated.
My guess is around 3000.
So, how many signed-up members have you got, Puppet ?

PS. I took that figure of 8000 kiters nationwide from Sunseeker's above post.

airush geoff
airush geoff
974 posts
974 posts
25 Oct 2008 9:11pm
I think SAKSA has around 170 members, but those that aren't members in SA I would guess at another 350 give or take.....

The core crew, ie those who ride more than once a week are basically all joined up I think- it is the fringe riders who only head out now and then who are most likely not to see the value.
okin
okin
QLD
83 posts
QLD, 83 posts
26 Oct 2008 7:24am
People are lazy, including me.
If it was easier to get insurance i'm sure people would do it.

It's just a suggestion but if seabreeze had a section where you filled out the form online then payed for it via credit card (something like paypal even) i bet you would have a dramtic increase in memberships.
i've tried to sign up for saksa twice but had to d/l pdf, fill out and post it back. Doesn't sound like much but as i said i'm lazy.
brucex
brucex
QLD
701 posts
QLD, 701 posts
26 Oct 2008 8:01am
thats is the best idea i have seen in a while -

Smedg
Smedg
NSW
836 posts
NSW, 836 posts
26 Oct 2008 10:05am
yeah, the whole printing of and posting in a form is so dated. Any annoying for lazy i mean busy people like me. form om ASKA website didn't even display properly for my browser. meaning I have to go somewhere and fill out a form, pay in person. I'm closer to QLD associations than NSW ones even though i'm in NSW but haven't heard back to know if I can re-register thru seqka or not. I got nothing against AKSA, in fact i greatly appreciated the service/ insurance they provide, but agree with 'slave and Okin that ease of access would improve membership rate. (By 1 at the very least). Also everyone likes shirts espcially if they seem free.

oh i wouldn't have a clue how many kiters there are.
puppetonastring
puppetonastring
WA
3619 posts
WA, 3619 posts
26 Oct 2008 11:19am
Hi Slave
I too would love to know total kiter nos for WA - and for all of Oz too. Unfortunately guestimates are as good as it gets and no-one really knows how close they might be .
As far as WA goes right now I would have to say, 'nowhere near enough' as many seem to be a bit slow re-registering . Luckily everyone is covered until the end of this month (legal period of grace) so as long as we get a flood of re-regos this week all will be well. .
So do it NOW. Go to the new website www.waksa.org.au where you will need to re-register all your details to fill out the new data base. NB Last years rego & logon details etc are all obsolete (your bookmark may be as well). This is a fresh new site needing new registrations - even from past members.

In answer to your question. To give an accurate indication I dont think I would be talking out of school to tell you that numbers ended up at end of 07/08 at about 560 (+/- a few?). My guestimate (no reason to be better than anyone elses) about 1 in 4 so that would make my guess 2000>2500 kiters for WA. For Oz wide imo I dont think you would be far off the mark at 8000 - again no idea how accurate that guess is.
puppetonastring
puppetonastring
WA
3619 posts
WA, 3619 posts
26 Oct 2008 11:34am
Smedg - Hi too
I think on-line rego can be an overly expensive option until you can guarantee a certain level of turnover. That may be why some states havent gone that way yet . But I do know that NSW do have an on-line facility.
We are working on a national system which wil allow for all states to offer on-line rego through their own website in conjunction with AKSA. Currently however the states, and their websites; are separate & independent. I realise too that AKSA's website is flagging but we are working on it. We are all but mere mortals.
Rest assured all will be well in the 'fullness of time'.
And in the meantime all that really matters is kiting
puppetonastring
puppetonastring
WA
3619 posts
WA, 3619 posts
26 Oct 2008 11:36am
and being insured
Smedg
Smedg
NSW
836 posts
NSW, 836 posts
26 Oct 2008 8:56pm
puppetonastring said...

Smedg - Hi too
I think on-line rego can be an overly expensive option until you can guarantee a certain level of turnover. That may be why some states havent gone that way yet . But I do know that NSW do have an on-line facility.
We are working on a national system which wil allow for all states to offer on-line rego through their own website in conjunction with AKSA. Currently however the states, and their websites; are separate & independent. I realise too that AKSA's website is flagging but we are working on it. We are all but mere mortals.
Rest assured all will be well in the 'fullness of time'.
And in the meantime all that really matters is kiting


Cheers puppet. Reregistered quick and easy at NSWKBA. That's the way i like it.

NSWelshmen go to NSWKBA and register for your insurance quick and easy.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply