RAL INN said..
Firstly there is a glut of instructors, second the IKO is a blatant ripoff past the actual written instructors material.
So what alternative do you suggest?
I don't think IKO is the problem really and even though the program is too short to get an instructor ready to teach straight after the course, I have to say that it covers all you need to know. Ideally, a new instructor should be shadowed by a senior instructor for a given period of time. Unfortunately I've seen too many school owners who couldn't be bother doing or even worst, getting them to teach for free without any shadowing....
In short I would say that the schools are the one to blame for not giving any sort of internal training. A responsible school owner should have a standard progression program in place instead of leaving their instructor the freedom to set up their own lessons.
I had the opportunity to teach for a couple of dodgy schools but also with a respectable and well established one here in Perth. Now I can say why there is so much difference in the cost as well.
The issue is mainly due to the fact that kitesurfing schools are not directly supervised by any sort of authority and currently there is no Australian approved course available to train kitesurfing instructors. I reckon the instructors should be assessed on their skills on a regular basis. I know a school who does it but unfortunately they are the only one in Perth. It shows how much the school owners care about the quality of their lessons......