Sunny Coast kitesurf bans???

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
kitethrills
kitethrills
QLD
185 posts
QLD, 185 posts
5 Nov 2011 10:09am
So the Sunny Coast Council are thinking of regulating recreational kitesurfing in our major estuaries. They have a terrible track record in developing and implementing practical policy for open space regulation. Their recent attempt to regulate the commercial side of the sport was pathetic. They even admitted it themselves (but did nothing to correct their balls ups).

I have zero confidence that their current efforts to regulate kitesurfing will be positive. I am very confident to predict that if they do get to regulate kitesurfing it will be another pathetic balls up.

Anyway.... rant over..... they are conducting an online survey as stage one of long process to bring in regulation. Stage one is to determine the need for Marine Zones (the regulatory instrument). The survey is to help them determine the need.

For those who want more information and detail, head to my blog here
http://kitethrills.com/3884/possible-kitesurf-bans/

There isn't much opportunity to discuss the issue on the online survey, so I encourage you to discuss here. There is also a comments section on the above link so please leave you thoughts.

Even if you don't live here, you are likely to holiday here in the future to enjoy this regions amazing and uniquely awesome locations.

Please complete the survey online and help the council bureaucrats realise there is no need for regulation, and we don't need the pencil pushers making blanket safety decisions.

I cant seem to post the secure link to the online survey on this site so try hitting it from the other link above.

Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
5 Nov 2011 10:25am
I just completed the survey....interesting.

The reference to kitesurfings affect on migratory birds is from 2005. Source over 5 years old is not very professional.

Good luck with it people....I'll be 12,000km away from all this bullsh1t
JayP
JayP
QLD
249 posts
QLD, 249 posts
5 Nov 2011 11:15am
Filled in the survey. I plan to move to the sunny coast when i am finished in PNG. had a few session in coloundra (in the river and off the beaches). top spot. was hoping to sped lots more time there. lets hope the council can come up with a plan that works.

I do a lot of work in PNG to maintain access to surf/kitespots but the situation in PNG is very different. no committees or councils to work with/through/around.
jl
jl
QLD
114 posts
jl jl
QLD, 114 posts
5 Nov 2011 11:48am
Filled in the survey.It would be a great pity if kiting was effected in these areas, we cant let it happen.
Rhys McClintock
Rhys McClintock
NSW
995 posts
NSW, 995 posts
5 Nov 2011 3:57pm
It does seem as though the survey is biased towards the exclusion of powered craft like jet ski's and boats... And it's kind of comforting that we've been lumped in with fisherman, canoeing and general beach activities...

But either way - it's still concerning... Fill the survey in guys...
Burls
Burls
209 posts
209 posts
5 Nov 2011 1:40pm
Just completed the survey for both Maroochy river and Pumicestone passage.

There's no doubt it's getting busier on the Sunny coast these days, but I say "Down with the Nanny state and let natural selection take its course".
QLD, 357 posts
5 Nov 2011 7:02pm
I have spoken to council and they have implied that the survey is aimed towards the possible need for more regulations mainly for boating, environment, fishing, jet skis and bathing areas.

Fingers crossed Kite surfing wont even get a 2nd look.

However from the information that I have gathered the only real concern council have is how and if kite surfing will effect the areas allocated for the general public who wish to use the beach for swimming, fishing and general use at both the mentioned areas. which is fair enough.

In my opinion council has the right to be a little concerned with kite surfers kitting very close to the bathing reserves in two of the areas that they are surveying.

There would be no harm in a little regulation and zoning in the way of a few signs clearly stating where it is safe to kite and where it safe to set up your family for swim/picnic.

I am totally against bans and heavy restrictions.

I do feel though that with the number of kite surfers on the coast (which i contribute to) a little zoning for the safety of kiters and for the safety of other beach users is probably not such a bad thing.

As long as council play fair and get the zoning right this could end up having a positive effect for kite surfing for the future.

Filled in the survey.

Luke







kitepilotoz
kitepilotoz
QLD
181 posts
QLD, 181 posts
5 Nov 2011 7:47pm
Only 12000kms!!!
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
5 Nov 2011 9:47pm
kitepilotoz said...

Only 12000kms!!!


14,464 to be precise!!!

Far enough away??
kitethrills
kitethrills
QLD
185 posts
QLD, 185 posts
6 Nov 2011 11:41am
Hey Luke - I wouldnt disagree with good regulation. I have been involved in the teams who have saved access to a few spots over time - Noosa, Cottesloe, and Semaphore, Byron Bay, St Kilda and others and the drive to restrict access is almost always coming from one or two people who have the wrong idea or impression of kitesurfing. Good regulation is good.

The problem is this council have a track record of not just doing bad regulation, but appalling regulation. This is stage 1 - to determine the need - if they think from this survey there is a need, then they will regulate. I would say there is then a very high chance they balls it up again and it would be likely that they conclude Cotton Tree and Happy Valley are very popular bathing spots, and important boating channels and it is not suitable to have kitesurfing there.

I think its very naive to believe what the politicians or beaurocrats say, particularly on the phone. last year, I spoke to them on the phone regarding the commercial regulations they put in place and was told (amongst other things) that the tenders would be announced in their newsletter so thats how to keep in touch (they weren't), I was told that operators track record and safety would be a major part of their comparison, it wasn't. I was told on the phone that money would not be the determining factor in decision making - i did become that. I was told they would do their best to correct their balls ups - they did nothing. Nearly every phone conversation i had contained BS that didnt happen and turned out to untrue. After these experiences i don't believe what they say. What you read is slightly more believable - it reads kitesurfing will be in the marine zone regulation.

Of course it stands to reason they dont want to do stupid things, but they have and they are.
They are using the sales data from one shop (viking kayak) to conclude there is increased canoes on the waterways, and this shows a potential need for regulation. What the hell sort of data analysis is that? Talk about using statistics to tell whatever story you want.

Kitesurfing is included in the marine zones. It is unlikley kitesurfing would remain unrestricted. It might not be a blanket ban, or it might be. It could be that we are only banned in daylight hours because that's when other beach users are there. Or we may be restricted in summer when its busy, or maybe something equally retarded like using it every other month.

It sounds stupid but last year the council set up a business permit, won by Kite X Academy, for a location (Happy Valley) that can only operate in SE winds (due to the headland and high rises to the north). That business cant operate in sea breeze. WTF? That is moronic beaurocracy at its best! These are the same people, with the same culture, same processes, and they are making the same mistakes.

For all practical purposes, this online survey for community and stakeholder consultation is the entire basis of their decision to regulate or not. Why is it not in newspapers, TV and radio discussion, why are the council not paying for advertisements to ensure they get community and stakeholder feedback. They are not serious about consultation because sometimes it goes against what they want to do. Its so much easier to get no response and then make their own decisions.
Urggh - this council obviously pisses me off, and I'm disappointed you could be so relaxed and/or naive to think it'll all be alright. it might turn out to be alright, but this might also be the very thin edge of an axe coming down on Cotton tree and Happy Valley kitesurfing.

Everyone ask yourself, do you have faith that this council will do the right thing if given the power? If you're not very confident, then give your feedback that there shouldn't be regulation.
cauncy
cauncy
WA
8407 posts
WA, 8407 posts
8 Nov 2011 12:14am
yo mike heres some personal data that you can pass on, 2 kayaks purchased, used 4 times left in the garage since,i feel for you mate, ive spent my life running from so called decision makers uk, france x2 germany back to the uk still no better australia, you need to up the anti, if you dont complain you dont get, local radio tv press, give it to them, what drives me mad is ,they the decision makers generally dont participate in outdoor sports so who are they to comment cauncy
BurkeyBoy
BurkeyBoy
QLD
549 posts
QLD, 549 posts
8 Nov 2011 8:09am
You could just move to Hervey Bay, the entire kiting community can fit in my lounge room! Just joking, stay away please Will fill in the survey as the coast is a great place to holiday and kite, so many different locations and styles. It's hard to know whether to play nice and hope things go well, or kick up a fuss like cauncy said.
jl
jl
QLD
114 posts
jl jl
QLD, 114 posts
8 Nov 2011 9:54am
I know in Cottesloe they tried to ban it so WAKSA or AKSA stepped in and now you have to be a member to kite there as you are then covered by public liability. Could be something to look at if the worst does happen?
AquaPlow
AquaPlow
QLD
1066 posts
QLD, 1066 posts
8 Nov 2011 11:01pm
Mike is on the money here.
This will be a numbers and loud voices game.
Have a quick review and answer the survey - the more expressions of interest the better our position.

A classic case of using data -- "There is lies, damn lies and statistics"(or words to that effect). The viking data you refer to Mike takes the first year's sale figures and the last year's sale figures to indicate the growth - the problem is the first year's figures are not for the equivalent 12 month sales period just a portion from when they started trading to the EOFinancial - not a valid conclusion to make.

There was a Maroochy river discussion paper called "Ship operations and activities on the Maroochy River" - (approx February 2010) Can someone recall what it was about - might have some pointers.

- Do the survey - we need to have a voice.

AP
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply