Forums > Kitesurfing General

Water proof Olympus or Panasonic Lumix camera

Reply
Created by kitecroc > 9 months ago, 28 Dec 2010
kitecroc
SA, 513 posts
28 Dec 2010 11:51AM
Thumbs Up

With all the after Christmas sales on i thought it was time to get a new camera. Has anyone compared the Olympus or Panasonic camera. Plan to use it for kiting and surfing and use the video recording functions as well. Also is there any other models i should be looking at other than a go pro?

Cheers Croc :-)

Chris6791
WA, 3271 posts
28 Dec 2010 10:24AM
Thumbs Up

I don't know about the Panasonic but I've got an Olymopus Mju Tough 8000. Its good for happy snaps and getting wet, but for immerson in water its not all it claims to be. Shove it in your pocket and go for a swim and its ok, go any deeper and my screen blanks out and only comes good a week or two later when it has dried out. The shutter lag isn't too good either, so if you want action shots look elsewhere.

Though the latest Olumpus Tough's may be a bit better sealed against the water with only one door and a different sealing lock. The sensor also had a hard time with really bright scenes (ie at the beach...) on video, gives the picture a purple tinge and lines across the image.

In saying that they are a robust camera and can take a flogging in day-to-day use.

I haven't heard anyone speak ill of the Go Pro...?

Big eeeZeee
NSW, 1100 posts
28 Dec 2010 1:55PM
Thumbs Up

I got a lumix. Haven't used it for kiting yet though. HD movives look sweet! check out youtube for some lumix vids

www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ft2-digital-camera-141-megapixel

cheapest you will find with AUSTRALIAN warranty.

getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
28 Dec 2010 11:13AM
Thumbs Up

I have a Lumix TS2 (same as FT2) and it is a bewdy. I did a quick shoot out with Tough and Lumix cameras in a store in average lighting and mving around a fair bit (making tricky for focus/exposure) and the Lumix IMO was streets ahead.

I have also had a bit of purple tinge when the sun is low, but when not copping direct sunlight the vid from the kitecan rig is very good.

Image stabilisation is great.

Underwater shots are superb (even tho reviews i read rated them as so-so). I only snorkel so I'm talking about 3m duck diving here.

The Lumix unit comes with a great silicon cover that helps protect from sand and also accidental door opening (even tho it has 2-stage clips)

Bonus is that the camera is a very good happy snaps (and more) camera/vid out of the water and really easy to work with.

I was super stoked to pick mine up for under $400 - now I believe you can find them for under $300. Wow! Awesome at that $$.


Only downsides at all are no lens cover (careful with sand at the beach) and no interval shooting (but stills can easily be captured from vid - at good res - internally in the camera)


Here's a few pics from 1st time snorkeling with it using the underwater mode. That green blob is a seaslug sorta thing curled up. Water was pretty cloudy that day and it was about 3m deep.







Poida
WA, 1916 posts
28 Dec 2010 12:09PM
Thumbs Up

i got the panasonic lumix and its a nice camera. remember to rinse in fresh water afterwards. pics and vid are great, editing is a dog on the video but thats another can of worms. i found best to shoot short sequences that can be joined rather than having to do too much to any video itself, otherwise you got to uncompress then edit then recompress then lose quality.
heres a vid after decompression, edit and recompression


milko
NSW, 604 posts
28 Dec 2010 3:24PM
Thumbs Up

Chris6791 said...

I don't know about the Panasonic but I've got an Olymopus Mju Tough 8000. Its good for happy snaps and getting wet, but for immerson in water its not all it claims to be. Shove it in your pocket and go for a swim and its ok, go any deeper and my screen blanks out and only comes good a week or two later when it has dried out. The shutter lag isn't too good either, so if you want action shots look elsewhere.

Though the latest Olumpus Tough's may be a bit better sealed against the water with only one door and a different sealing lock. The sensor also had a hard time with really bright scenes (ie at the beach...) on video, gives the picture a purple tinge and lines across the image.

In saying that they are a robust camera and can take a flogging in day-to-day use.

I haven't heard anyone speak ill of the Go Pro...?




This is spot on.. I also have the olympus 8000 which i bought after my Olympus M720 packed it in..I took the 8000 in the pool on xmas day and it hasn't worked since.. screen first blacked out and now when i turn it on the shutter continuously opens and closes and the only way to stop it is to take the battery out.. Also the pics arn't as nice as the lumix..

hotracer
73 posts
28 Dec 2010 12:34PM
Thumbs Up

Hey I have a second hand olympus water`proof camera I´m looking to sell it works great for pics and video

AquaPlow
QLD, 1051 posts
28 Dec 2010 4:23PM
Thumbs Up

Talked about this before - still annoyed with not so tought Olympuss (10metre one). Not recomended. A couple of models back now but basically the same.
This was No 2 ( a warranty job) - the first one died when the battery leaked (!!)
No1 great for 6 weeks - No2 Not well made.
This one compared to the first was a total lemon - poor focus poor auto what evers - bad lense set-up - paint flaked off - and it had a micro-leak and tortured me trying to keep it working. (Shelved for last 18 + months must chuck-it - Ahh first resolution 4 2011 - not hard to keep either!!)

Have gone to a GOPro HD but not as useful - not a family / general purpose camera - not a hands on camera more set-up attach to your kit and forget - can't tuck in wetsuit and paddle over a wave quickly - can't pull out your pocket and snap - pictures are very local (no focus) hard to know if it has taken a picture alot of the time (in a bomb proof case) - but for video gives good results (better than Mju).

Family camera - Definitely go the Lumix - well made - fiddled with on on 25th liked it - (Bro-in-law's - goes well, but he is not such a water duck).

It is a trade-off between lense performance and sensor - most models have big sensor and limited lense. So if it is well put together and your shots are in focus (i.e the auto bit works well) + you lense is clear (water drop(s) / sunscreen etc) - dry inside (!!) you can get some great results on/in the water due to sensor definition.

Alternately treat as a disposable and get the cheapest possible and throw as soon as it stuff's up. (My kid's Fuji is hanging in there and cost $180).

Time to pump down the pool again another 160-180 mls did it Box Day AM (& we aren't having it too bad!!)

AP

Front profile comparison



Width Comparison



Swim puddle



harry potter
VIC, 2777 posts
28 Dec 2010 5:40PM
Thumbs Up

I have had a lumix for the last few years....... It gets a flogging, kiting, thrown into the boat dropped on the sand etc........ Only ever rinse it when salt crystalises on the lens.

I have often kited with it up the sleeve of my wetsuit or in the pocket if my shorts, it's great that way you can just stop take a few pics as your mates go past then go again.

Just remember to change the pic quality if you intend to email pics 12 mega pixel is not emailable ( at least not on my cheap pc )

bolgo
WA, 881 posts
28 Dec 2010 6:05PM
Thumbs Up

canon d10
this got top review of these type of cameras compared on ?dpreview.com
a bit wider than the others, but better picture quality and zoom

does it all on our family trips skiing, gnaraloo, snorkelling
stills and video

FOT
WA, 101 posts
29 Dec 2010 8:27AM
Thumbs Up

I had a lumix which I used in my kitecsm mount last season. Good image quality etc but it ended up dying because I didn't rinse it after every session. Other downer was that there is no intervals shoot function.

I've now got a pentax w90 Now which is heaps sturdier and has a great interval shoot function.

kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
29 Dec 2010 1:31PM
Thumbs Up

I had an Olympus and took it underwater a lot in ~7yrs and never had a leak or any other issues. Having said that I wouldn't buy another, there were a few things that annoyed me. (Short battery life, bad night shots, hard to clean salt off lens, info all over pic playback screen, etc)

I would recommend the Pentax because of the interval shoot but also because it has the centre lens arrangement which means you can buy cheap kite strut mounts for it.

PS funky I always imagined you as slightly older than that, guess that explains some of the posts

kitecroc
SA, 513 posts
29 Dec 2010 2:11PM
Thumbs Up

Cheers for the advice guys, ended up getting the Panasonic lumix. So looking forward to the next session to test it out.

Thanks again Croc :-)

Driesdtl
37 posts
29 Dec 2010 11:50AM
Thumbs Up

Got an Olympus Mju Tough 8000 and is showing corrosion and its impossible to lock on to stuff most times for a pic, the quality of shots is also often pretty dodgy:(

Kat
WA, 145 posts
29 Dec 2010 2:03PM
Thumbs Up

I've been through three Olympus water/shock proof camera's and they suck. There is a new Sony water proof camera that is out that I have tested and seen my other mates use and they are rad - not sure about the panasonic one, but I'd say steer clear of the Olympus. I have not read the threads above but in my experience they are so prone to getting water logged and poorer quality of photo's compared to other cameras!

Kat
WA, 145 posts
29 Dec 2010 2:04PM
Thumbs Up

Sweet! Just read that you picked up the Panasonic, nice choice

Gstar
WA, 391 posts
29 Dec 2010 2:39PM
Thumbs Up

Do it right! Pick the camera on its merrits then get a "suitable" waterproof case. Have been using a Canon Ixusi with the Canon marine housing for over 7 years now without a hitch. The key is a real marine case. My new choice is the Panasonic Lumix TZ8 with an Ikelite marine housing. Sure, it doubles the price of the camera but the quality and longevity of the product speaks for itself.

Here's a link to a site that gives plenty of options for popular camera brands.

www.bristolcameras.co.uk/c-ikelite-compact-housings.htm



getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
29 Dec 2010 6:11PM
Thumbs Up

Nice advice Gstar and i looked at this option a while back.

However.. FAIL.

For most cameras the custom housing costs more to buy than the camera. The FT2 housing on that site costs 200 pounds!

Bonus is you get uber waterproofing.

Downside is bulk and weight so not compatable with kite mounting etc.

Keep it simple. Go a tough or Lumix (nah go the Lumix) add a $100 kitecam rig and you are ready to rawk.

Aaronkmk
QLD, 3 posts
29 Dec 2010 9:43PM
Thumbs Up

i got the panasonic lumix from santa. took it out the other day got som good shots. cant complain. even the HD video is good. got me splitting my kite in half all in high def.. lol

snorton
WA, 87 posts
5 Jan 2011 9:01AM
Thumbs Up

I have the lumix FT1 and think its pretty good. Straps to the kite and takes long periods of AVCHD vid (have a look at link - utube has reduced the quality)


Poida said...

i found best to shoot short sequences that can be joined rather than having to do too much to any video itself, otherwise you got to uncompress then edit then recompress then lose quality.

Poida (or anyone else), I use the AVCHD as it lasts for +1hr with a 16GB card, where as MOV is limited to 20 min. How do you join AVCHD video using the photo fun studio? (I know the new FT2 model has different software) Do you convert the AVCHD? What do you use?

ueberqwerty
WA, 59 posts
5 Jan 2011 11:15AM
Thumbs Up

I got both Panasonic and Olympus (3m) and prefer the Panasonic. The Olympus has got a smaller field of view (don't like) compared to the Panasonic. Also, the sliding protector my Olympus has got, the one which slides over the lens, might be a good idea but is not so good in its implementation. Mine got stuck quite a few times.
Had one water damage on the Olympus (snorkling in 2m of salt water), which was repaired for free by Olympus during warranty period. I am missing the timelapse function on the Olympus, which I think comes in handy.

Poida
WA, 1916 posts
5 Jan 2011 1:58PM
Thumbs Up

i used Free AVCHD Converter V1.0 from Kyote Software - loses slight amount of quality soon as you convert to mpeg then edit in whatever eg premier elements or moviemaker, then it loses some more quality when you compress again or save out of the editor. then you lose some more going to youtube unless you upload into the HD one.

thats comin from a back yard butcher as far as video editing is concerned.

I dont think there is a simple answer for the avchd mts files, there was a topic on seabreeze awhile ago explaining a lot of it and the best solution was spend more on the vid camera and maybe go to standard def with better frame rate, lens, etc etc etc and its a simple edit and better final video.

heres the result of decompressing, edit then recompress with the panasonic lumix dmc-ft1 - sun is allways a problem at this time of day on the west coast


snorton
WA, 87 posts
5 Jan 2011 10:28PM
Thumbs Up

thanks poida, just got the FT2 software off a mate that converts to mpeg - still with loss in quality.
That was a great couple of days of waves on the vid - any footage of a rrd obsession yellow red brown?

Poida
WA, 1916 posts
6 Jan 2011 10:31AM
Thumbs Up

might have some, will have to dig through it and check, will edit a section out if i can find it and pm you or put it on youtube



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"Water proof Olympus or Panasonic Lumix camera" started by kitecroc