I will have the amount of kids that
I can afford to bring up. Why should my next door neighbour have to help pay for my kids?
FACT: Why is it usually the people with the large families are the ones that are either out of work or on low income? I tell you why. It`s because they don`t have the brains to realise that they should live within their means. And what happens is their kids grow up having the same mentality that government handouts are a right and instead of helping to keep the country going when they are older they become a burden on the country. A prime example is the U.K. You go into any low paying work areas, eg. macdonalds, kfc, the cleaning buisness etc. and the majority of the workers are foreign. And the first thing people say is " These bloody foreigners comming in to nick our jobs." No. The fact is most of the local kids rather sit on their arrrses and go on the dole than work in a low paying job and work their way up. Why is it that the people here that are getting the most handouts (Government benifits) are the ones the government are finding the hardest to get into the work force? Oz should learn from the mistakes such as in th U.K. Benifits are there as an aid when in
need, not a bonus for laziness. Isn`t it better to have less kids and look after them better, afford to send them to uni etc, afford to give them nice things. When I`m ready to have kids I still want to enjoy the finer things in life (like buy a new kite every season

) and I also want my kids to enjoy the same. Realstically can I do this with ten kids or with one or two?????
My colleague with the five kids has never taken them on holiday, the other guy with two has, he struggles to kit them out with the sports gear they need or when they need money for school outings etc, the other chap has no problem. His stress affects the kids I`m sure. So wich kids are having the better up bringing?
It`s not about whether parents have it easy or not. It`s about what is best for the kids.