beefarmer said...Plummet said...
Humidity is somewhat more confusing. Water vapor is actually lighter than air. So the more humid the air the less dense the air is. .... that i can't be bothered calculating.
Hmm interesting thanks Plummet. I didn't know water vapor was lighter than air. This may explain why i was struggling so much in the fluffy sparrows fart warm moist air in Bali.
I always knew heavy dense air = more power (cold front vs summer sea breeze here in WA) and that moist tropical wind = gutless. But the warm bali air should be roughly the same temperature as a summer seabreeze here.... maybe a slight difference but i didn't think that alone would account for the complete lack off power over there. Higher moisture content and therefore lower density might explain the difference though.
Plummets calculations show its 5% +/- so virtually nothing, you were struggling because your kite was too small and the wind was too light. The difference is quite small 5% or even less, depending on the density of the air, not so much the temperature (i.e - is the wind in a low pressure weather system or high pressure system?)
If an experiment could be conducted, in different temp winds, the results would be inconclusive, because 5% difference (if it actually is that much, which I doubt) will be virtually undetectable by a kite flyer and the opinions of power would be subjective.
I'm sticking with my claim and advice that 30 knots somewhere is equal to 30 knots anywhere (which is actually a fact that can't be disputed)
The power that warm 30 knots in a high pressure system can deliver compared to 30 knots in a cooler low pressure system, is a very small bees dick of difference