a little concerned

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
tobes
tobes
NSW
1000 posts
NSW, 1000 posts
6 Nov 2005 11:32pm
Your "bosses" are going to find someone who will do your work for less. Simple. Jobs will go to the lowest (skilled) tender. It's selfish of you to say these reforms will not affect you. They will affect our society, thus you.
One of our major problems is we can no longer afford to pay ourselves to do the work we need done to keep us in the lifestyle we think we deserve, but are infact stealing from our grandchildren. We rely on a slave class. China, India etc.
As for those of you that think the govt. is doing a good job, hosko!, Iraq, Children in detention, GST, foreign debt, Kyoto, David Hicks, Uranium Mining, and now the right to lock any of us up for an unspecified amount of time without trial for writing something like I am now.........in the name of FREEDOM, for F@CKS SAKE.
Wake up kiddies, read something other than Rupert's Australian or the Tele, not much you can do about it until next election, but please consider something other than the fatness of your own wallet when you tick a box.
carbine
carbine
WA
1450 posts
WA, 1450 posts
6 Nov 2005 8:37pm
quote:
Originally posted by lovey

HELLO...MY NAME IS NATHAN AND I'M A CAPITALIST

Ten years ago i started university and like all uni students i passionately believed in my right to be paid by the government to study, and to recieve instant employment and a massive wage upon completion of my degree.
As it turned out, i worked my ass off at night packing shelves to fund my education, only to finish it and find that employment in my chosen field offered marginally less than i was earning at woolies...

at 22, i started a subcontracting apprenticeship earning app.$6 an hour, in addition to providing my own transport, own tools and own insurance...

At 30 i'm I'm paying off my second home, driving a brand new car, and contemplating buying a whole quiver of those frightfully expensive bows, just 'cause i can...

When most people talk about the appalling rate of pay for apprentices, they seem to forget that within 5 years, those apprentices are the very same tradesmen who are charging you $40 an hour to change tap washers. I know IR is a scary thing to most...but from my point of view, how could any business exist if we had to pay top dollar for every kid fresh out of school. you gotta pay your dues, and as everyone i've talked to about it agrees, if you are truly good at what you do, you'll get paid what you deserve.








Thats exactly the problem.

No one wants to earn 6$ an hour for 4 years doing a **** job.

So there aren't many skilled people around. What does that do? Forces up the wage rates of skilled people.


Electricians earning 100k a year is a joke.
lovey
lovey
NSW
177 posts
NSW, 177 posts
7 Nov 2005 8:18am



Thats exactly the problem.

No one wants to earn 6$ an hour for 4 years doing a **** job.

So there aren't many skilled people around. What does that do? Forces up the wage rates of skilled people.


Electricians earning 100k a year is a joke.



Plenty of trades will work for 4 years on ** pay, because they aren't so narrow minded that they can't see the big picture...it sucks earning no money at first...it sucks sharing accomodation in delapidated housing, it sucks eating 2 minute noodles for weeks on end - but in the end you get there, and you end up getting rewarded with a great lifestyle.

trades are only earning 100k a year due to a lack of skilled labour...true.
there is a lack of skilled labour because too many people won't start on a poor minimum wage...true

So lets take your approach then, and go on the dole, because it pays better. No new apprentices means that the few skilled workers will charge you even more (luckily, because there will be thousands more like yourself on the dole to support) and the situation gets even worse.However if the minimum wage was to increase dramatically as you suggest it does, then we can't afford to put on new apprentices either.

we are banging our heads on the wall here, to be sure. There are too many sides of the picture, and i'm not going to say that IR is going to benefit everyone. I just know that emloyers employ people because they have to...they need you. If you are honestly good at what you do, i can't see there being a problem - although i will admit that this is based entirely on my working situation...but then what do i know, i'm just a dumb tradesman afterall!



jan
jan
WA
1119 posts
jan jan
WA, 1119 posts
7 Nov 2005 9:29am
do we even need a minimum wage... it just drive the costs of goods and services up.

i say build a nuclear power plant down in kwinana. the fuel is cheap and locally sourced. theres a tonne of jobs involved in it. the waste is simple to manage. as a freebie you get clean drinking water and put western power('s-off-we-are-striking-again) out of business

stuff it... why don't we just succeed from the rest of australia. 90-something-stupidly-high-% of the resources, less than 10% of the population. your 30c West Oz Dollars will buy you a family dinner instead of a cone.

HIZAKITE2005
HIZAKITE2005
QLD
41 posts
QLD, 41 posts
7 Nov 2005 12:03pm
You all must realise that this discussion could be interpreted as "SUBVERSIVE".Now thats real funky legislation. MAY JOHNNY'S RADIANCE SHINE ON US ALL!!!!!
PRAISE BE TO JOHNNY (he's worth dying for. Where is that backpack!!)
Fitzy
Fitzy
QLD
617 posts
QLD, 617 posts
7 Nov 2005 10:35pm
There is a cost in training new apprentices and staff. They are unable to work productively for some time and require constant supervision and guidance. The difference between full wages and apprenticeship wages reflects this cost. Someone has to pay. Why shouldn't the trainee pay by accepting a lower rate of pay while the valuable training is being provided. This training will stand them in stead for the rest of their life.

Many people only look at what they actually recieve "in their hand". While I understand that this is what they will use to live on it should be understood that this amount is not the true cost to the employer.

Look at the the case of a person taking home $650.00

The employer then has to remit an extra $184.00 to the taxation department each week as PAYE Tax.

Plus an additional $75.06 each week to a superannuation fund for the employee.

Then they are paid an additional $3336.00 for 4 weeks annual leave (not to attend work)

Plus an additional $583.80 annually for leave loading.

Plus $1700.00 for 10 sick days leave (which most people take whether they are sick or not)

Plus they are paid $1700.00 not to work on the ten public holidays each year.

Plus the employer has to pay workers compensation insurance premiums for each staff member.

So when you look at the amount you actually recieve in your hand, consider the real cost of your employment. It has to come from somewhere. Just like the Dole Payments that some in this forum seem happy to take without providing anything in return.

Fitzy Gold Coast OZ

LouD
LouD
WA
642 posts
WA, 642 posts
7 Nov 2005 9:02pm
Has anyone seen the 5th lines on the 2006 Fuels. Really neat!
bondo
bondo
QLD
699 posts
QLD, 699 posts
7 Nov 2005 11:14pm
that might be the case fitzy, but at the end of the day people arent sticking out apprenticeships because they are not receiving a living wage. employers need to look at training costs as an investment, not just an expense. its rife in the IT industry, hiring on skills checklists, skimping on training and then wondering why there are no staff left to maintain that old mainframe thats been rusting in the server room for 15 years. and the only guys that can do it cost 100+ an hour. its short sighted, and costs money in the long term.

anyway, I can see the advantage for small business, you guys certainly need more flexibility. but I have no faith whatsoever in larger companies, especially national and global corporates, to uphold ethical employment standards. they've proven their contempt for their staff numerous times over the years, and we're effectively giving them all the power.
Fitzy
Fitzy
QLD
617 posts
QLD, 617 posts
9 Nov 2005 1:42am
The new IR laws a specifically designed to assist small business. This is where the government is hoping to create a large number of jobs. Small to medium businesses really struggle with the multitude of legislation and paperwork not to mention the responsibilties thrown on them as employers.

The unfair dismissal laws really make small employers think twice about increasing staffing levels. An employee can virtually walk out at any time withoout penalty but an employer is forced to provide councelling, training and even redundancy payments if an employee is unsuitable or needs to be retrenched.

I understand your comments about large multinationals but they are on a different playing field to the smaller operators.

If you have 5 employees and someone takes a "sickie" you have 20% of your staff away. Pressure for the others that have turned up to work.

If you have 100 employees and one doesn't show that is only 1% of your workforce away for the day. Much less impact and so on for even larger employers.

Fitzy Gold Coast OZ
Spacemonkey!
Spacemonkey!
SA
2288 posts
SA, 2288 posts
9 Nov 2005 9:39am
Laurie i think one of your links are broken, i click on this thread and it takes me to some politcal page
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply