quote:
Originally posted by ottisgrey
Well Da?
How about that?
I happen to share carbine’s opinions and don’t fancy by association being called dumb, negative, stupid, anti commerce, anti profit for sharing them.
It is by way of your drivel with gibberish, your penchant for backing outright slanders with oddball philosophy that we find ourselves here.
I think that there are rip-off deals that exploit a kite freak’s freakiness,that this freakiness is the object of many affections, the wool on our sheepish backsides, if you don't mind.
I suppose I have the right to my own considered opinion without getting tarred by your b/s plus philosophy.
If this is an attack on Cabrinna, well, nobody held a gun to their heads and told them to jack up the locals.
ottisquote:
Originally posted by Kitepower Australia
Hey Guys
If you were not so obsessed with beating me up then you would just not respond, so it is in fact you guys who are filling the forum with dribble, and gibberish.
Taken from the same article posted by Ral In to try to discredit what I wrote.
f. Is There No Escape From the Subjective?
Despite plausible ways of arguing that intersubjective disagreement indicates error and agreement indicates some probability of truth, defenses of objective knowledge all face the philosophically daunting challenge of providing a cogent argument showing that any purported “mark” of reliability (including apparent intersubjective agreement) actually does confer a high likelihood of truth. The task seems to presuppose some method of determining objective truth in the very process of establishing certain sorts of subjective impressions as reliable indicators of truth. That is, we require some independent (non-subjective) way of determining which subjective impressions support knowledge of objective reality before we can find subjectively accessible “markers” of the reliable subjective impressions. What could such a method be, since every method of knowledge, judgment, or even thought seems quite clearly to go on within the realm of subjective impressions? One cannot get out of one’s subjective impressions, it seems, to test them for reliability. The prospects for knowledge of the objective world are hampered by our essential confinement within subjective impressions
Seems like this guy has a problem with true objectivity too...
Lets move on eh?
This was all brought on by Ottis who is becoming obsessed with objectivity and my response to carbine about the use of the term rip off.
Cya and
Goodwinds
Steve McCormack
PS "I read it on the internet so it must be true"
quote:
Originally posted by Kitepower Australia
Make no mistake Ottis
Carbine is way more intelligent than you.
You sound oddly familiar, very odd - ly.
Like someone who is know to be obsessive, and a total idiot, not saying this is you just that you sound a lot like this other person that has delusional obsessive paranoia megalomania issues.
Go back to just using 2 or 3 syllable words, combined with infant like logic and taunts, please.
Cya and
Goodwinds
Steve McCormack
quote:
Originally posted by t o b y
wondering how much the new ss turbo diesel and airrush halo will be costing.... the gk sonic and the cross bow prices are already out there
toby
