wipika airblast 6.3

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
18 Jan 2006 12:58pm
i have loan of one of these at the moment just for when it's blowing close to 30knots. what are they like? 2002 model i believe. is the 6.3 in the same measurements as todays kites? ie. will i notice a considerable decrease in power compared to my 2005 8m spec II????
anyone who has flown them let me know
cheers
RAL INN
RAL INN
SA
2898 posts
SA, 2898 posts
18 Jan 2006 3:59pm
Multiply 6.3 by 1.36 =8.568. which is flat area.

use a bar with a chicken loop release, from memory that is a pre safety release of the chicken loop model.

So 8.5m of high aspect ratio thrill machine in 30+kts.
sounds like fun.

Best winds
Tony L
ABK
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
18 Jan 2006 1:33pm
oh so bigger than my 8m spec II?
Ben De Jonge
Ben De Jonge
WA
819 posts
WA, 819 posts
18 Jan 2006 2:35pm
I used one to learn on. It was the kite that on my first ever fly of a kite (with an idiot mate supervising) nearly dragged me across the road at Melville Beach.

Almost put me off the sport that did.

They've got some grunt for sure. They are at least equal to an 8ish, but might be more. The extra depth to the shape catches more wind I think.

And the re is no real safety, which is bad.

I alos found my mate's one would drop out of the sky is you sheeted it in too hard. Really strange kite.

Be careful, or ditch it and go for something 2004 +
mcbain
mcbain
WA
73 posts
WA, 73 posts
18 Jan 2006 2:44pm
I received my new Wipika 2002 Airblast 8.4 and 6.3 yesterday and flew
both on the beach in about 8-10 knots of wind.

Both kites flew so sweetly that I still have trouble getting my head
around em.

The 6.3 is a big improvement over the 2001 version. It seems to have
a lower aspect ratio at 4.1 although the specs are similar to last
years. It flew with great stability and was fast and smooth in the
air. I flew it on 30m lines and used a 50cm bar, after feeling the
65cm bar was too intense when it came to response in turns.

The 8.4 was more responsive than last years, with every subtle turn
on the bar resulting in turns from the kite. It felt very smooth but
had a punchy, very direct feel to it. The lift felt good after
boosting about 12 feet off the deck on the beach in light wind.

I am yet to try them on the water and will give more feedback once I
have accomplished this, but till now, the new 2002'2 go off!!

Happy sailing,

Darren Marshall



found this review may help
Steve
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
18 Jan 2006 2:44pm
ok yeah i have got it sorted now. i was only going to use it if it actually was 6.3m flat compared to my spec 2 8m. just to get out in the 25-30knot stuff. i'll just stick to the 8.
thanks guys
azza
azza
1338 posts
1338 posts
18 Jan 2006 3:02pm
lurvely kite... rebuilt my airframe just to keep it flying, I think it's that good. Don't get much chances to fly it though... don't get that much wind too often... FkN fun when it does but!
Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
18 Jan 2006 8:49pm
Hi Mcbain,

Where did you get that old piece of trivia??? A trip down memory lane, thanks for that.

It depends upon whether it is a series one or series two. The series one had the wingtip bladder about 16 inches from the tip and no tip rod. The series two had the T3 strut mounted only inches away from the wing tip which was an improvement as the wing tips puckered if you used the bridle that came with it's original configuration.

If it still has the original bridle, check the line that runs through the pulley at the point where it goes round the pulley as the "core" of the line used to break and leave the outer protective sheath intact and looking normal until under huge load when it would suddenly ping and launch you into the first kiteloops before they became a trick.

I practically came up spitting blood after a bridle snap in 30 knots in mid jump (quite high) and landed on my ribs powered

It is a truly great kite, just don't over inflate the LE bladder. The struts need to be tight to prevent bending in flight.

I think you'll find that the Wipika AB 6.3 of '01 will be a better kite in 30 knots than your LF Spec 2.

Enjoy the kite and make sure you add a trim loop with a Quick Release.

Good Winds,

Kitehard
(aka Darren Marshall of 2001 )
mcbain
mcbain
WA
73 posts
WA, 73 posts
19 Jan 2006 11:25am
Hi Kitehard,
i just put wipika airblast 6.3 review in to google and that was the first one that came up.
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
19 Jan 2006 12:22pm
"I think you'll find that the Wipika AB 6.3 of '01 will be a better kite in 30 knots than your LF Spec 2. "
??????????????????????????
why is this? 4yrs better design and about the same area how is this possible?
CAUTION
CAUTION
WA
1097 posts
WA, 1097 posts
19 Jan 2006 12:56pm
SITH LORDS
watch their cunning attempts to pry you away from the force and into evil young jedi.
your mind you must clear hmm.
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
19 Jan 2006 2:47pm
'wooooggghhhhheerrrrrooorrrrrr': this is wookie tongue for i didn't believe it but want to hear some reasoning.

don;t really understand how it could be better.
Free2Kite
Free2Kite
QLD
85 posts
QLD, 85 posts
19 Jan 2006 5:08pm
Suck it and see.
azza
azza
1338 posts
1338 posts
19 Jan 2006 3:19pm
quote:
Originally posted by hosko

'wooooggghhhhheerrrrrooorrrrrr': this is wookie tongue for i didn't believe it but want to hear some reasoning.

don;t really understand how it could be better.




High aspect ratio (makes for a fast kite with high lift to drag ratio), rearward COP (makes for heavy bar preasure but allows an efficient lifty profile), and deep wingtip profile (makes for powerfull turning and flares the tips, flattening the kite, when sheeted in hard... this really extends the lower range of the kite by increasing the effective lift developed toward the tips, just like a bow kite... if you look at most other kites the tips have little to no profile)

... aren't you glad you asked?

Is that kite jellyfishing?!?! Nah... it's just an AirBlast making the most of the wind.

BTW when I rebuilt my AB10 I got rid of the bridle and attached a 5th line... the result is wucken fonderful! Well worth the effort and into it's second season already.
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
19 Jan 2006 3:20pm
nah she's right rodney boy....
sleek1
sleek1
VIC
672 posts
VIC, 672 posts
19 Jan 2006 10:55pm
hi. i had a 8,4 airblast as my first kite and when i got better it became my high wind kite. I never got over powered on it when i got competent and used to do massive jumps. it had al soughts of bladder problems but was a sic kite. It died on a 30-40 knot day at woolamai.
very sad day.
Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
19 Jan 2006 9:21pm
Hi Hosko,

The Airblast range of kites was at the time a huge leap forward in technology as they were the epitomy of performance kites at the time. Wipika were looking to build high performance kites. High aspect, fast, big wind range, sleek profile and fun to use.

I am not knocking LF, but they build kites with a different focus, stability, grunt, durability and ease of use which make them great for the masses. Due to their grunt they tend to have shorter wind ranges per sq m. ie better bottom end.

You will find the 6.3 will have a better top end than the LF Spec 2 and will be a machine when the winds hit 30 knots. Size has nothing to do with wind range and performance. Dont knock it, just try it and let us know your findings.

Good winds,

19 Jan 2006 10:05pm
who's shmoking who
hosko
hosko
WA
393 posts
WA, 393 posts
19 Jan 2006 10:13pm
interesting.....
will give it a go tomorrow if we see 20-30knots.
will be taking my spec 2 anyway in case the wipika is crapola.
cheers
RAL INN
RAL INN
SA
2898 posts
SA, 2898 posts
20 Jan 2006 8:31am
From those who are Airblast Bred Kiters (ABK)

to those about to be.

we salute you.

Best Winds
Tony L
ABK
azza
azza
1338 posts
1338 posts
20 Jan 2006 7:01am
Old AirBlasts never die... Azza gets 'em!

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply