stonker board - which side is toeside?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
adante
adante
50 posts
50 posts
28 Oct 2010 12:39pm
If nothing else I hope this gives someone a chuckle.

Ages ago I picked up a cheap stonker board (off these very forums) which I have been learning with.

I don't know much about boards and obviously this one is relatively unsymmetric around the lengthwise axis. It is symmetrical along the breadth axis (so bidirectional, or maybe non-directional)

Previously I have been fitting into them with the toes pointing 'up', according to the orientation of the attached picture. This seemed sensible to me as it orients the text on the board to be readable by me.

Today I noticed that the text on the straps are actually oriented the other way which cast some doubts on how I rode it, so I just wanted to confirm this is the right way to ride it?

And can someone explain what the weird ends are supposed to do?

edit: thought I uploaded a picture with this but lordy me knows where it has gone. Here it is on tinypic

/images/misc/forum-image-missing.gif

IanR
IanR
NSW
1360 posts
NSW, 1360 posts
28 Oct 2010 4:31pm
Agh a Stonker Shark I had one years ago.
Either side can be the heel or toe-side. The theory was 2 boards in one Ride the long side on your heels in light wind and the short side on the heels when the wind was strong. The other Idea/theory was if you rode the long side on your heels it made toe-side easier as the toe rail is shorter.
Neither theory really worked the reason we don't have asymmetric boards any more. Have fun
adante
adante
50 posts
50 posts
29 Oct 2010 11:18am
haha thanks, mystery solved
bingles
bingles
WA
363 posts
WA, 363 posts
29 Oct 2010 2:57pm
The Nobile range is still rockin an asymetrical design, even though very small
AKSonline
AKSonline
WA
925 posts
WA, 925 posts
29 Oct 2010 11:31pm
IanR said...

Agh a Stonker Shark I had one years ago.

Neither theory really worked the reason we don't have asymmetric boards any more. Have fun



Sacrilege! The Stonker Shark was a legend! I rode one in the Schick event in 2001 and took a place in the final.

Dude the Shark ROCKED! Extreme upwind on the long rail, extreme boosting on the short rail. This board was EXTREME! Alex Gillan was a misunderstood Genius and Pioneer in early twin tip and directional Design. Show a little respect!

Funny enough I actually saw my old board not long ago, someone else owned it and still rode it from time to time.

EXTREMEly Funny

DM
radman4
radman4
678 posts
678 posts
3 Nov 2010 3:54am
AKSonline said...

IanR said...

Agh a Stonker Shark I had one years ago.

Neither theory really worked the reason we don't have asymmetric boards any more. Have fun



Sacrilege! The Stonker Shark was a legend! I rode one in the Schick event in 2001 and took a place in the final.

Dude the Shark ROCKED! Extreme upwind on the long rail, extreme boosting on the short rail. This board was EXTREME! Alex Gillan was a misunderstood Genius and Pioneer in early twin tip and directional Design. Show a little respect!

Funny enough I actually saw my old board not long ago, someone else owned it and still rode it from time to time.

EXTREMEly Funny

DM


Same used to have one of these myself years ago and was sorry i sold it,awesome light wind board ,huge central concave ,for a big board it was surprising how much wind you could hold the edge in,the asymetric design really worked bring it back id buy one.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply