Bundeenaboy said..Chris 249 said..
I've never yet been on a yacht where 10kg was the difference between winning and losing on a harbour, even when you are winning national titles with or against Olympians, America's Cup sailors and pros. An S80 should be going the same speed as the Peterson 30 Fiction, (which is actually currently sailing about 10-12 minutes faster than you are) and about as fast as the Etchell in the light stuff, so there's lots of other stuff to sort out before looking at engine weight. The only pic I can find of Fiction shows her being well sailed -nice trim and excellent weight positioning- so she should be a good yardstick.
Sea Rug Hoo Ha used to be beaten by similar or greater margins by rotbox Thunderbirds with big engines and some old sails. The speed difference involved in an engine change is probably less than you lose by getting one or two roll tacks wrong. And if you haven't been out doing things like working on your roll tacking, making sure the rig tune is precisely right, that your tactics, trim and helming are at the level where you have won titles in classes like Lasers or Etchells, hitting the gym, etc, then engine weight is such a tiny issue as to not be worth even considering.
The best S80 at my old club used a 6hp, if I recall correctly - it may have been bigger. One of the guys had been 4th nationally in the most popular two person dinghy. Another had about three national title wins and a Sydney-Hobart victory to his credit. The sails were excellent and I'd reckon they were sailing it much better than any similar boat in Sydney (with the probable exception of some of the top J/24s). They were sailing in different conditions but if that sort of sailor will sail with a 6 then it's not going to slow the average S80 to any significant degree.
Chris,
Your comments reek of negativity and inaccuracy and are not based on fact.
Your quote 'An S80 should be going the same speed as the Peterson 30 Fiction'.This is not what the CYCA handicapper says, but obviously
you know more than the handicapper. In 2017 Fiction won its division with a total of 11 points (3 firsts and 4 seconds after drops). Sea Ya finished in its first year of racing with 20 points.
This year Fiction came third with 15 points (with drops of 15 points). Sea Ya came fourth with 16 points( with drops of 12 points).
Sea ya beat Fiction to the line in races 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 10. We never came worse than fourth in 10 races. We would have won the series if we had the drops of the boats ahead of us. We were too consistent for our own good.
I welcome any positive suggestions that will make us race better, but unfortunately there were none in your post.
I suspect you look on much better than you play.
My comments are answering exactly the question you asked. If you don't want honest answers please don't ask questions.
As far as not being based on fact, you're completely wrong. The CYCA winter series is run on arbitrary handicapping (apart from the IRC division) where they adjust the handicap on the boat's finish placing, NOT on the actual design. That's why handicaps change from race to race even when the boats themselves do not. I'm not saying I know better than the CYCA handicapper because they were doing something different to what I am doing.
The comparative performance of the S80 and Peterson 30* has become apparent in the 35+ years the two designs have been racing each other, when boats like Superzilch, Casablanca, Cagou IV etc first competed in JOG events. Since I've sailed a bunch of S80s and own a boat of the same class as Friction and I'm interested in comparative performance, I've been checking out the performance ever since. In my last offshore regatta, my main competitor was a sistership of Friction. When I last looked at racing the same boat, my main competitors were S80s. The performance of these two boats is something I've kept an eye on.
So what do the experts who design rating systems to assess comparative boat performance say about the comparative speed of an S80 and a Peterson 30? The Offshore Racing Council's computer, tank test and VPP-based ORC system says the S80s have an average rating of 730.8, compared to the Peterson 30 which rates 723.1. That means an average S80 should finish a 12 mile course just 92 seconds slower than the Peterson 30.
Under the Royal Yachting Association's NHC system, the S80 rates .925 and the Peterson 30 .918. That means that if an S 80 finishes in 2.5 hours, a Peterson 30 should be just 68 seconds ahead. Under IRC, Peterson 30s rate .920 and the average S 80 .913, so again the Peterson should be only about a minute ahead in 2.5 hours. Under the Victorian class marks, which are confidential, the S80 and the Peterson 30 rate very close. So I'm not pulling this stuff out of the air - I'm using ratings derived by the top international authorities and others over several decades - and they accord with each other pretty closely.
There were positive suggestions in my post, just as when you asked the question earlier. The suggestion was to stop worrying about the boat and spend time and effort on sailing it.
Oh, and as far as your claims about being better at looking than playing, I've won enough national and state titles to have found out that the best way to play is by researching how fast your boat should go, how to tune and sail it to achieve that potential, and then training lots before you worry about the little stuff on the boat.
* That's the North Star/Friction style of "pintail" Peterson 30 as built in WA and NZ, of course, not the "Phase IV" design that was sold as the Santana 30 and Contention 30 but sometimes referred to as a Peterson 30, or the later Green Dragon, Skorpion etc types.
