boty said..
i cant believe how cheap this era of boats is selling for, though hull to keel joints can be an issue they are simple well built performance cruisers that weren't bumped excessively to fit horrible rules my only concern for distance sailing would be slaming to weather in choppy conditions and load carting capacity
It's also interesting to see that even much newer boats of the same style are only marginally better in objective terms. Compare the Farr 11.6 to Farr's Benny 36.7 and the 35, the J/35 and J/36 to the J/109, etc, and there's only a marginal speed improvement, if any.
It seems that since construction materials haven't improved much, weight can't really come down and the speed can't really improve. If you try to fit more down below, weight climbs once again. Sure, you can fit a bulb on the keel but that increases loads, which increases structural weight and cost.
It's amazing that we can look at a Farr 11.6 or 38 and see a boat that still compares well to modern craft even at 40 years of age. Compare that to 9say) 1980, when a 40 year old design looked positively ancient. No wonder it's hard to convince people to buy new boats these days.