cisco said..
If you consider a motor vehicle where the manufacturer might specify a running in period of 10,000 klms. At 100 klms/hour this equates to 100 hours of running.
Therefore a running in period of 100 hours for a marine diesel would seem to be appropriate.
I would be talking with Kubota about that. Diesel engines love "load".
If you nurse that engine you will surely glaze the bores. This "running in" idea/proceedure is not generally relevant today.
Engine manufacturers have figured it out and no longer make engines to the size tolerances that require a "running in" period. They deliver engines "ready for work".
You are "allowed" to run the engine at whatever load capacity you "choose". Of course running it as the manufacturer recommends is recommended for warranty purposes.
Cisco, I am having a little difficulty reconciling these two statements of your's, which do you think is actually more appropriate here?