Modern designs -Hull shock loads

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Yara
Yara
NSW
1322 posts
NSW, 1322 posts
2 Nov 2015 9:29am
I was crew on an almost new Hanse 40ft yesterday. We were heading towards Pittwater from Americas Bay, straight into a 20+knot Nor-Easter in Broken Bay. Tide was running out against the swell. Time was critical, so we decided to motor.

This is a notorious area, producing steep waves with a short pitch. At full throttle and circa 7 knots, the boat was pitching wildly, and slamming down with huge bangs which shook the boat hard, so much so, that I thought it could do damage. The accellerations were so extreme, my bottom was leaving the helmsmans seat! To reduce the action, we throttled back, which helped a bit. However, the only way to really reduce the banging was to change course and take the waves on the quarter. This meant we were effectively tacking under motor!

Any suggestions/ comments from the experts on modern boat designs?
samsturdy
samsturdy
NSW
1659 posts
NSW, 1659 posts
2 Nov 2015 9:34am


Crikey........I've got all that to look forward to when I finally get to Lion Island.
Gravy7
Gravy7
NSW
242 posts
NSW, 242 posts
2 Nov 2015 10:12am
Having part-owned a Hanse 40 and being very familiar with that part of Broken Bay I sympathise and feel qualified to comment.

Making 7 knots head on to the swell in an outgoing tide would not be comfortable in any boat but the slamming of the hull would not cause any damage to hull or rig IMHO.

There is no solution other than the ones that you tried - easing back the throttle and taking the waves on an angle (I assume you meant on the bow, not the stern quarter). And, yes, that will take a bit longer but everyone aboard will appreciate it especially if they are at the ends of the boat.

Hanse has a good reputation for quality construction but all boats deserve a bit of respect to ensure they last as long as we need them to.
Jode5
Jode5
QLD
853 posts
QLD, 853 posts
2 Nov 2015 3:45pm
Boats have been carrying flat fore sections for a long time now which will pound into a sea. This is something you have to learn to live with if you want speed and a boat that sails well at most angles. Shaggy will know all about it with his new boat, but he should already be use to it with the Sonata 8 , as they have a very flat fore section in front of the keel. Another thing most modern boats get is slap under the transom, this why I would not have a boat with an aft main cabin. They Hanse 40 is a beautiful boat to sail and it is worth it to put up with the odd thump.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
2 Nov 2015 11:25pm
Well built fibreglass boats are tough. As long as you do not run them into something solid like a rock they generally stay afloat.

Having owned 7 yachts to date, two built from plywood, one from aluminium, one from steel and three from fibreglass, I will now only trust hulls built from aluminium or fibreglass.

The longevity of fibreglass hulls has not yet been determined as there are some fibreglass boats still floating that are up to 50 years old I think.

However if I had the funds and desire to have a custom yacht built, for the sake of low maintenance, strength and longevity, it would be built in aluminium.

My Peterson 42 IOR 2 tonner ENVY II is the greatest yacht I have or will ever own. She was driven by the original owner/builder onto Bramston Reef off Bowen at 8 knots and only suffered a few scratches.

Then there is the example of a sister ship to my Lotus 9.2 that was bounced over the Fiji surrounding reef for 30 minutes or more and into the lagoon with no major damage.

With a 30 pound sledge hammer you might be able to punch a hole in a lightly built fibreglass hull in one blow but I doubt it would go right through.

With the conditions you are describing I would be more worried about the rig than the hull.
Trek
Trek
NSW
1215 posts
NSW, 1215 posts
3 Nov 2015 6:43am

For my two cents, coming from NZ where the seas are always big, I find modern sailing boats are often what I would call flimsy.

I remember seeing a modern "trendy and shiny white" european brand yacht sitting on its keel in a slipway in Sydney, the keel was bowed and pushed into the hull causing it to bend and crack. Pathetic design.

Someone I know had one and hit a sand bar - the centre board/pseudo keel fell off! ie. An ocean going boat that fragile??!!

Masts same. If you look around a bay at the moored yachts you can tell which masts might break and which ones are sized to be sturdy.

Fibreglass is a really good boat material but it needs a few more layers than go onto those boats. More effort needs to go into making them yachts instead of pretty white things used for picking up girls and prestige in Sydney Harbour.

Only my two cents worth :-)
Crusoe
Crusoe
QLD
1197 posts
QLD, 1197 posts
3 Nov 2015 6:36am
Yeah, it seems that some of these new style production boats are targeting the Charter/ Weekend sailor. They are certainly very comfortable when anchored up and do sail comfortably and point well in certain conditions. A big open space inside with no hand holds is probably the first thing that should tip a buyer off that the boat was not intended for rough conditions.

Would you take a flat bottom punt out into rough conditions. Anybody who has spend time in a run-about knows the merit of a deep V when encountering waves so why would it be any different for a sail boat. I suppose one of the things is that some people who cruise started sailing in clubs where racing (there is no prize for second) is the main theme and the need for speed is entrenched in the blood. Unfortunately this ingrained need to have a fast boat can sometimes infringe on safety and comfort. But sailing is a compromise and some people are quite happy to put up with one inconvenience, so they can reap the rewards of another.

My 2 bob's worth
shaggybaxter
shaggybaxter
QLD
2680 posts
QLD, 2680 posts
3 Nov 2015 7:20pm
Jode5 said..
Boats have been carrying flat fore sections for a long time now which will pound into a sea. This is something you have to learn to live with if you want speed and a boat that sails well at most angles. Shaggy will know all about it with his new boat, but he should already be use to it with the Sonata 8 , as they have a very flat fore section in front of the keel. Another thing most modern boats get is slap under the transom, this why I would not have a boat with an aft main cabin. They Hanse 40 is a beautiful boat to sail and it is worth it to put up with the odd thump.


Yep to what Jode5 said, that's exactly what happens on the Sonata. When it is a big landing, it robs you of a knot or two in boat speed and drops to leeward another half boat length before you can recover. Rounder hull shapes with long keels ride much more comfortably, but too much so and your wetted surface area increases again (drag) , it is I suppose the archetypal displacement hull shape.
The Pogo I expect will be more pronounced at crashing, at least due to the fuller bow profile.

That is one modern design trend I was seeing: increased volume in the bow. It seems to provide several benefits, ie: more room(obviously), more buoyancy, less nose dive to name a few.
The scow bow is becoming hip




Sectorsteve
Sectorsteve
QLD
2195 posts
QLD, 2195 posts
8 Nov 2015 5:37pm
I did that same route alot in my bluebird. It was never comfortable.
Chris 249
Chris 249
NSW
3585 posts
NSW, 3585 posts
9 Nov 2015 9:54pm
One other thing is that U-shaped bow sections with a flat bottom are very efficient in many ways. They provide lots of volume for low wetted surface, compared to Vee sections. And when you are sailing in a decent breeze and the boat is heeled, the edges of the flat U turn into a Vee, just when you want it - that is, when the boat is heeled and moving fast upwind, the same conditions you are going to get hit big waves.

However, the theory comes unstuck when you motor into headseas with the boat upright. Then the flat section of the U is horizontal, and you land on it - hard.

This came out many years ago when some of the Peterson designs that were among the first to take on the U-sections broke frames in the USA - not when they were racing, but when they were motoring home (IIRC) from a high wind race.

You see something similar in dinghies. NS14s, UK Nat 12s and MRs, Int 14s etc have U shaped sections because they have low wetted surface and good planing lift. Bethwaite boats, which are not built to length and sail area restrictions, can have Vee shaped sections that carve through chop better but slow the boat down in light winds.

Personally some of the worst slamming I have ever felt was a rough trip back from Noumea in a long keel Vee section boat. When she heeled to the gale from the nose, the Vee became a flat panel that the whole boat would drop on. Yeccchhhhhhh!

As Shaggy mentioned, old IOR style boats like the Sonata would slow down when slamming. That meant that the good helms would work the boat around the waves like a Laser, weaving over and through to keep the boat moving fast without bouncing. When IMS boats came in, with their higher stability, some guys who should know said that since they had more power and would not slow down when they slammed, you just kept them pounding over the waves and hoped they wouldn't break. It seemed to be a classic case of revenge effect and in my (limited) experience, that generation of IMS boats was incredibly uncomfortable.




Jode5
Jode5
QLD
853 posts
QLD, 853 posts
9 Nov 2015 10:33pm
Chris 249 said..
One other thing is that U-shaped bow sections with a flat bottom are very efficient in many ways. They provide lots of volume for low wetted surface, compared to Vee sections. And when you are sailing in a decent breeze and the boat is heeled, the edges of the flat U turn into a Vee, just when you want it - that is, when the boat is heeled and moving fast upwind, the same conditions you are going to get hit big waves.

However, the theory comes unstuck when you motor into headseas with the boat upright. Then the flat section of the U is horizontal, and you land on it - hard.

This came out many years ago when some of the Peterson designs that were among the first to take on the U-sections broke frames in the USA - not when they were racing, but when they were motoring home (IIRC) from a high wind race.

You see something similar in dinghies. NS14s, UK Nat 12s and MRs, Int 14s etc have U shaped sections because they have low wetted surface and good planing lift. Bethwaite boats, which are not built to length and sail area restrictions, can have Vee shaped sections that carve through chop better but slow the boat down in light winds.

Personally some of the worst slamming I have ever felt was a rough trip back from Noumea in a long keel Vee section boat. When she heeled to the gale from the nose, the Vee became a flat panel that the whole boat would drop on. Yeccchhhhhhh!

As Shaggy mentioned, old IOR style boats like the Sonata would slow down when slamming. That meant that the good helms would work the boat around the waves like a Laser, weaving over and through to keep the boat moving fast without bouncing. When IMS boats came in, with their higher stability, some guys who should know said that since they had more power and would not slow down when they slammed, you just kept them pounding over the waves and hoped they wouldn't break. It seemed to be a classic case of revenge effect and in my (limited) experience, that generation of IMS boats was incredibly uncomfortable.





Well said Chris. Having helmed many ocean races including Sydney to Hobart you soon learn how to helm a boat over waves, unfortunately every so often a wave will catch you out, especially at night with no moon. Fortunately when cruising, if you have to go to windward you can foot off a little which makes life a lot better.
When bringing our new boat home from Sydney we copped 30kn plus on the nose from 3.00pm till 5.00am when we got to Coffs. Being a new boat we did not want to damage boat or new sails so decided to motor. Unfourtunally larger yachts actually drop harder than a smaller boat as they launch themselves higher and further out of the water. We were taking the waves on at an angle and dropped the boat speed to 5kn to try and smooth out the ride. Unfortunately we also had 2kns of tide against us so we were only making 3kn over the ground. With no moon we still had some hard landings. When we got to Coffs we found the TV would not tune so we checked the antenna only to find it had been flicked from the top of the mast when we crashed off a wave. We spent 24 hours in Coffs and then hooked into the southeaster and had a great ride the rest of the way to Brisbane. 28 hours from Coffs over the Gold Coast seaway and up to Redcliffe.
If you Google jode7 you will see a YouTube clip of the trip from Sydney to Brisbane
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply