JonE said..
Chris you or I might have a preference based on experience (mine is to wear one) but do you really advise the average Joe, or his wife, child or mate going out in a tinny not to wear a lifejacket going over a bar?
It's over simplified because it couldn't be any other way. Imagine if they said "life jacket mandatory except when you have swum 500 meters in the pool in the last year" or something like that. What about clothing? Do you think they would make them mandatory except when people were wearing swimming gear or a wetsuit? Or just if they're not wearing bulky clothing.
No point in arguing the technicalities. If you pushed me out of the boat in the middle of a bar on a warm summers day, I would prefer to be in boardshorts and no lifejacket.
But accidents don't happen in perfect conditions, they happen in ****ty conditions when people are tired and maybe it's dark and I'll bet the rescue guys would much prefer people to be floating face-up with a bright yellow floaty thing round their neck.....
No, I didn’t say the average person in a tinny on a bar shouldn’t wear a PFD.
My point was stats from Transport NSW which were referred to in a piece on the Ballina tragedy defined preventable drowning as "cases where a person was presumed to have drowned and was not known to have been wearing a lifejacket”. IMHO that is invalid, because (1) the inference is that the drowning was preventable if the person was wearing a PFD and (2) it completely ignores the fact that some people who drowned and were not recovered quickly could have drowned in a PFD, which affects the stats on how much PFDs increase safety.
So If you get dragged down when harnessed onto a sinking boat (as has happened) then it’s counted as a drowning that could have been prevented with a PFD, which is absolute rubbish. If you are drown inside a capsized boat or sinking boat, as has happened quite a bit and which is a situation in which wearing a PFD is unlikely to help and may be a major hazard, it’s classed as being avoidable if you were wearing a PFD even though the PFD use may not have been a factor. If you vanish in the water wearing a PFD but nobody knows you are wearing one and your body is never found, it’s classed as a death that could have been avoided if a PFD was worn, even if you were actually wearing a PFD and were one of the 28% of boaters who drown with one on, or if you are killed by a shark or being bashed against rocks.
I’m not against PFDs, but against poor research and what appears to be the simplistic over-promotion of PFDs. People think of them as something that will save a life if the wearer is exhausted or unconscious, and that’s rarely true - if you can’t actively maintain your body position you drown from splash inhalation. If you’re really tired and it’s dark you’re probably dead anyway unless you have a waterproof light and a splash cover over your face.
On the other hand I know at least three people who have ended up in the water at night up to three miles offshore without PFDs. All of them have scary stories but they’re all here to tell them. That’s not to say PFDs aren’t useful, but those guys I know don’t get in the stats as people who survived without a PFD, and yet the guy I knew who was still hooked onto the boat when the boat sank would be counted as someone who would have been saved if he had a PFD. Simplistic studies are arguably bad science.