Jackson close vs jp

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Foam
Foam
WA
768 posts
WA, 768 posts
31 Mar 2016 11:26am
Looking at a change

JP is 8,10 x30 126 litres

Jackson close 8,8 x30 122 litres

Would these be very similar to each other I don't think there is much in the litres and 4 litres may not even be noticable

But I guess the shapes are different so there lies the question
colas
colas
5390 posts
5390 posts
31 Mar 2016 1:46pm
4 liters between two different brands mean nothing, as often brands have different means to measure the volume. Most use the number given by the computer-shaping software, but actual volume will vary with the post-shape and glassing. (and the Deep is listed at 126 liters, too, BTW)

The shape is much more important.
They seem quite close. From the pics, the Deep seem to have a slightly wider nose, that will bring a better stability. But the most critical parameters, rocker and rails are not listed nor visible...

I have never seen any of them in real life, nor ridden them, but I would go with the australian build rather than the asian production. Gong is now re-localizing its production from China to Portugal, and can now compare the same board shapes with the same specs build in both factories: the european one is lighter ( ~ 1.5 lbs on a 7'6"), and nearly 4x more impact-resistant. This is due to the quality of workmanship, tools (the CNC) & materials (resin, cloth, and especially the blanks).
Plus Jackson was riding for JP, so the Deep model seem an evolution of the JP shape.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply