Just regarding the Alco-Pop Tax, (I believe it was introduced nationally by a Rudd government which is slowly shooting off toes one at a time)....
The Stats are in;
30% drop in Alco-Pop Sales
13% jump in spirits
1.7% jump in beer
2.2% jump in wine
I did some calcs based on my rough guess of bulk overall sales, assumed Beer was 45% overall, 40% was wine, 8% was spirits, and 7% was Alco-Pops, to make up 100% of alcohol sales.
When we add the new weightings, total alcohol sales are approx 46% Beer, 41% wine, 9% Spirits, and 5% Alco-Pops, and a total of 101% allowing a 1% growth in sales, growing population, etc.
So doesn't it just show that people just changed what they drink, based on price.... I doubt it reduced overall consumption, or turned youths away from booze. Plus, wouldn't some of the youths go towards "mix your own spirits", which is surely far more dangerous for everyone concerned, than pre-mixed drinks.... ???
Anyway, I thought it was another case of "Bureaucracy gone wrong" !! A government wasting it's energy....
-------------
www.theage.com.au/national/party-animals-turn-to-spirits-20100527-whh2.htmlParty animals turn to spiritsMay 28, 2010
The controversial tax on pre-mixed alcoholic drinks has killed sales and nudged party animals towards drinking spirits, official data shows.
The federal government says the sales plunge in "alcopops" is a win against teenage binge drinking, though the data says nothing about the age of drinkers.
But the opposition and the distilling industry say younger drinkers are switching to dangerous, full-strength spirits.
To combat under-age drinking, health experts want taxes raised on stronger alcoholic products.
Pre-mixed drink consumption fell by 30.2 per cent during the previous financial year, coinciding with a 13.4 per cent jump in sales of pure spirits.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics data was collected after the government hiked by 70 per cent the tax on alcopops in 2008.
That tax increase also coincides with a 1.7 per cent jump in beer sales and a 2.2 per cent increase in wine consumption.
Health Minister Nicola Roxon admitted the figures showed a shift from ready-to-drink (RTD) alcohol to straight spirits, beer and wine.
"We're not making any secret of that but you need to be able to say, 'Look across the board and see whether there's a reduction in consumption' and it is a staggering one," she told reporters.
Overall alcohol consumption fell by just 0.14 per cent in 2008/09, but the minister said this was still "a lot of alcohol".
Ms Roxon hailed the drop in pre-mixed drinks as a sign of a delay in the starting age of drinkers.
But she admitted the data did not indicate the age or gender of drinkers.
"It's not a survey of personal consumption so it can't give you that information," the minister said.
Her opposition counterpart, Peter Dutton, said the figures vindicated the coalition's earlier warning about drinkers switching from pre-mixed products to spirits.
"Increased consumption of full-strength spirits rose significantly, which indicates RTD drinkers turned to mixing their own - a worrying outcome where younger people are concerned," he told AAP.
The Alcohol Policy Coalition wants taxes raised on more harmful alcoholic products to discourage would-be drinkers aged 12 to 15.
"There needs to be a uniform approach whereby alcohol is taxed on the volume of alcohol in the product, because we know this move will produce significant health benefit," spokesman Todd Harper said.
The Distilled Spirits Industry Council of Australia, which opposed the tax, said no one should use the data to claim a drop in underage drinking.
"The tax could only ever have been successful if there are underage drinkers who blankly refuse to drink any other type of alcohol product, including ones they mix themselves from bottled spirits," spokesman Stephen Riden said.
"Those underage drinkers simply do not exist, no matter how much supporters of the tax might wish."
The alcopops tax was made permanent in August 2009 after the coalition and Family First senator Steve Fielding reversed their previous opposition to the levy.
AAP