7.5 sail questions

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
ejmack
ejmack
VIC
1308 posts
VIC, 1308 posts
28 May 2007 12:53pm
Hi All,

I'm looking at buying a new sail around 7.5m. Currently the Severne NCX, Neil Pryde V6 and North Sails X or R type have me interested. Maybe also the Ezzy freeride? I'd be interested to hear any one's experiences with these sails. I ride a Fanatic Eagle 126 mostly just freeride, bump and jump, etc. Thanks in advance.

mathew
mathew
QLD
2172 posts
QLD, 2172 posts
28 May 2007 4:42pm
Are you asking about the sail size in general (as in "Is 7.5m a good size for my size board?") or specifically for quirks with the listed brands?
mkseven
mkseven
QLD
2315 posts
QLD, 2315 posts
28 May 2007 6:28pm
Out of those I rate the Ezzy the best for you're needs.
ejmack
ejmack
VIC
1308 posts
VIC, 1308 posts
28 May 2007 9:42pm
Not so much sail size but performance, durability, etc. I guess my inital question wasn't really the right one. Would anyone not recommend any of the sails I mentioned for free ride sailing and why? Would cambered be a better option for early planing and speed? Anything really as I'd like to get as much info as possible before buying.

I have a 6m Ezzy wave (07) which is a great sail. Just curious to hear some other opinions.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
28 May 2007 7:59pm
I'm far from a sail "guru", and one of my theories has already been proved wrong. But I thought cambers where mainly for light wind, when there's not enough force to fully "set" the sail. Once you're fully powered up, cambers shouldn't make a huge difference.
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
28 May 2007 10:11pm
The Severne NCX 7.5 is a very good sail, I've used a mates on the odd occasion, very light, would be good for freeride, although as mkseven suggested - the ezzy's got a more durable build. The North and the NP V6 have good reps also.

I've got a Gaastra GTX 7.5 with 3 cams, great for freeride, (a little heavy) looks good (how vain!), can be awkward with the cams creating an 'air-lock' under the sail when trying to either uphaul, or waterstart, but when planing at a good speed, it has the best 'feel' (pretty much 'drives' itself!!). Also another good quality is that I've landed on it heaps of times, harness hook and all,(I'm not a lightweight!), and it hasn't shown any signs of wear'n'tear.

I'd suggest cams definitely for what you're after.
TonyC
TonyC
WA
410 posts
WA, 410 posts
28 May 2007 8:20pm
Hi ejmack, I have been out of the sport a while and just getting kitted up again now. Some things don't change and what I have experienced is that cammed sails are great to lock in the drive and if constructed correctly the draft will stay in the correct place - they are better when fully powered up (overpowered). Large no-cams are better in lighter winds when you are trying to get on the plane as the draft and depth moves a lot more (balloon slightly) when pumped enabling a quicker transition onto the plane. Newer no-cams hold the draft better as well. As for constuction and longivity you may want to look at Tushinghams, T3's in no-cams and Lightning in 2 cams - they are very quick, hold their draft position, constucted well (great durability) and also far cheaper than most of the major brands. Don't know if any shops carry them in Vic - but check out the website to find out more.

Regards

Tony
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
28 May 2007 11:56pm
quote:
Originally posted by decrepit

I'm far from a sail "guru", and one of my theories has already been proved wrong. But I thought cambers where mainly for light wind, when there's not enough force to fully "set" the sail. Once you're fully powered up, cambers shouldn't make a huge difference.



decrepit, I'm no 'spert on sails either, but the sail I have (with cams) is better in good winds than the sails without (obviously being a 7.5, not too strong winds!) The cams seem to hold the sail in a 'set' position, and it doesn't move, something to do with oncoming wind(from forward force) holding the outside of the sail, whilst the wind you're catching in the cambers holds the inside, it pretty-much doesn't need any steering, you just lean-back and enjoy!!! (I'm a lazy mug.)
Now I that I've read TonyC's reply, he sums it up nicely.

I'm only a freeride sailboarder, so, I can't really comment on the 'wave' aspect, but I wouldn't think you would use a 'cammed' sail in waves? as you have to 'flick' the cams around when turning. Maybe someone with a little more experience (than me) could shed a light on the subject?
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
28 May 2007 11:02pm
There's one thing I do know! I don't want to use cams in waves!!!

It's not just the flicking thing, you also need to depower at times, a cammed sail doesn't do that very well.

I can see how cams keep tension in the sail and stop it moving about. I've yet to use the cammed sail I have on loan in high winds, it'll be interesting to see how it compares to my wave sails.
mathew
mathew
QLD
2172 posts
QLD, 2172 posts
29 May 2007 1:09pm
Barry Spainer's weblog explains that old-school wave sailors wanted de-power capabilities of non-full-lenth battened sails; where as new-school sailors grew up only using full-battened sails and so prefer the constant power.

I have always wondered why cams arn't used in wave sails, as the cams will give you more power during wave riding and it helps reduce the back-wind effect. For reference, modern wavesails use a lot of skin tension and tend to use quite a few battens to maintain their shape.

My question for wave sailing would be, is depowering something of a side effect that you learn to live with?

( I dont wavesail so I have no basis for comparison. )
wayneg
wayneg
WA
105 posts
WA, 105 posts
29 May 2007 11:44am
Cams / No cams??

Surely, you're not thinking of using a 7.5m sail in waves?

ejmack
ejmack
VIC
1308 posts
VIC, 1308 posts
29 May 2007 3:02pm
Thanks for all the replies. Judging from what I've read over the past few days (here and elsewhere) I'm really better off with a non cambered sail, especially since I'm more likely to be using it in lighter winds rather than overpowered conditions at first. I wanted a sail to use in the low teens. At the moment all I have is my 6m Ezzy wave which is fine for me from 14/15 knots and upwards. I've heard very little in the way of bad comments regarding the newer Ezzy's so it's probably the direction I will continue to take.

I have another question regarding Ezzy sails for those who have had some experience with them. Is buying the Ezzy RDM masts really worth the extra money. They seem to rig a little easier but do they offer much in the way of performance to the average person?

Thanks again all!
mathew
mathew
QLD
2172 posts
QLD, 2172 posts
29 May 2007 3:50pm
I wouldn't simply right off cams... The fastest light-wind sails all use cams, eg: NP RS5/6/Racing, Gaastra Vapour, etc.

I personally have a GunSails Booster 7m which has 3 cams - it would have to be one of the better sails I have used for pumping in light air as the foil is deep, low and well forward.

(The Booster however has other faults, it lacks top-end speed and is quite hard to de-rig.)
Longreef
Longreef
NSW
49 posts
NSW, 49 posts
29 May 2007 5:20pm
The Gaastra matrix has awesome test reviews and a very solid fast feel that will rig well on an SDM mast. Let me know if you'd like a demo of it I can organise it for you
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
29 May 2007 7:03pm
quote:
Originally posted by mathew

Barry Spainer's weblog explains that old-school wave sailors wanted de-power capabilities of non-full-lenth battened sails; where as new-school sailors grew up only using full-battened sails and so prefer the constant power.




Here I go again, opening my big mouth, and I wouldn't want to ague with Mr Spanier. But the so called soft sails came out when sails were cut with more shape, and yes a fully battened sail didn't turn off, it always had a bit of shape.
But then wave sails went flat, and full battens held the sails that way. These sails really turned off, took a lot of wind to give them any shape, that's why they had such lousy bottom ends. (much more so than the soft sails, that only required a light puff to shape them up)

Now there seems to be both schools, some wave sails like north and ezzy have shape built in and don't fully turn off, others are much flatter and are harder to turn on.
But even the sails with shape are much flatter than the first fully battened sails, and still depower enough for wave riding.

quote:

I have always wondered why cams arn't used in wave sails, as the cams will give you more power during wave riding



Don't necessarily wont more sail power wave riding, power comes from the wave, what is needed is control, that's why depowering is desirable at times.

quote:


My question for wave sailing would be, is depowering something of a side effect that you learn to live with?




No, not being able to depower would be something you'd find very hard learning to live with.

For example, I've just started using a borrowed cammed sail for this gps speed challenge thing. Just found gybing with the cammed sail so much harder, I find it much easier to flip the rig when it depowers on the way round.
ejmack
ejmack
VIC
1308 posts
VIC, 1308 posts
20 Jun 2007 7:36pm
quote:
Originally posted by mathew

I wouldn't simply right off cams... The fastest light-wind sails all use cams, eg: NP RS5/6/Racing, Gaastra Vapour, etc.



No, I'm certainly not, but I am a little concerned a cam sail might be more I can handle at the moment, me being at the bottom end of the intermediate level (I can water start confidently, plane, tack, etc. but just getting the hang of gybe's), although I would prefer to buy one as I feel I would appreciate it more further down the track. Would a cam sail make learning gybe's more difficult, and why? Arn't cam sails no suppose to be much easier to "flip" or is there more to it than that? Also, is there a noticable difference in top end performance when compared to a same size no-cam freeride sail?

Thanks for all the help guys, it's been greatly appreciated!
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
20 Jun 2007 7:19pm
May just be me, but I've only had uncambered wave sails since the 80s.
From last month I've joined the GPS speed challenge and I've been using mates cambered sails. Found them much harder to gybe, for 2 reasons.
1 The 6.6m Gastra's I borrowed from Hardy need an energetic pump to get them to rotate, this unsettled my gybe and made it slower to power up.
2 the shape in the sails seems to push against me as it's rotating, I had to be much more forceful getting it to go round.

Saying that I've also used an Avalon Sail Co 5.5m twincam rehack. That rotated much easier, so I guess it depends on the sail. I haven't had enough experience with cams to help there.
nebbian
nebbian
WA
6277 posts
WA, 6277 posts
20 Jun 2007 7:54pm
Hi Emjack,

If it was me I'd get a 7.5 with cams, my Aerotech VMG (with 6 cams) rotates much smoother than any of my wave sails, because you don't have to pump the sail to get the bottom battens past the mast.
Plus, cams keep a lot of shape in the sail for when it's light.

I went up from 6m to 7m a couple of months ago, and I get going in a good 2 knots less wind than before.

One thing I would suggest though, is make sure it's physically light, unless you enjoy a good workout
Bender
Bender
WA
2236 posts
WA, 2236 posts
20 Jun 2007 7:57pm
My 2cents.
I think you need to decide what you want your 7.5m sail for.

Get a cammed freeride (2or3cams) if you want to use the sail in stronger winds as cams really help making a sail stable allowing you to have more sail cloth up in stronger winds with out pulling off ballance.

Get a cammless sail if once it hits 20knts you will change down to your 6m ezzy.

For example i have used my 7.7m 5cam tushy x-15 in winds upto 20-25knts with no problems as the sail maintain stability where as my previous Maui sail 7.5m cammless sail was all over the place once it got to 18-20knts.

My tip would be get a twin cam sail freerace sail such as the tushy lightning(2cams). With this option you get the best of both worlds and its a sail you can keep and still use once you have improved and want greater performance in stronger winds.

Cheers Bender
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
20 Jun 2007 8:06pm
quote:
Originally posted by nebbian

Hi Emjack,

If it was me I'd get a 7.5 with cams, my Aerotech VMG (with 6 cams) rotates much smoother than any of my wave sails, because you don't have to pump the sail to get the bottom battens past the mast.



Sounds like crappy wave sails nebs, none of my Avalon Sail Co wave sails need to be pumped to rotate.

Seems like it's wrong to generalise, there's sails and sails.
Jimmy@Tas
Jimmy@Tas
TAS
77 posts
TAS, 77 posts
20 Jun 2007 10:39pm
You could always get an Ezzy Infinity,

I have on 07 6.5m and it works great with or without the cams.
If its cranking i can put one or both the cams in and if its light wind i can use no cams.

works a treat whichever way u use it

Jimmy
DavMen
DavMen
NSW
1510 posts
NSW, 1510 posts
21 Jun 2007 10:28am
Hi ejmack

Have you had a look at this sail?
www.seabreeze.com.au/Members/Classifieds/Item.aspx?id=c1548107-b0d2-469d-ba1f-c3d4b74add85&search=fcsx%2fWPrVqk%3d

Just somthing worth considering. They are great sails. No CAMs, powerful, very tunable, durable and versatile - they get heaps of raves in the US. I think it would match with your board nicely.

Just in case you are wondering, I have nothing to do with or even know the guy selling it! But its something I would be looking at.

On BTW I have a 7.5 Ezzy Inf. and run it with Bottom Cam in only - seems to be a good compromise - I wouldn't call it an early panner but it is stable at speed - I beleive the Aero would plane earlier.

DavMen
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply