have i discoursed in a foucaultian manner?
does that mean that i am a postmodern nihilist at the core.
maybe i am a postmodern modernist. you could be right then...i shall look in the mirror and see if i see a french man.
or i may have to sit on the fence.

do i rely on that which i reject? did i infact reject anything at all.
to reject the capatilist views associated with modernity from a moral sense doesn't necessarily portray a rejection of modernity. i consider myself a modernist, in music, art and architecture. my contradiction then it seems is my want for globalism and a love of postmodern humour.
Did my discourse subvert the dominant paradigm. i believe it empowered the dominat paradigm by paying tribute to it's evolvement.
it was more an exploration of the evolution of windsurfing within a postmodern environment, or have we crossed into a new era that is yet to be defined on the artistic and philosophical time line.
and yes i think that top and bottom turns are more functional than a quasimodo.