Mast IMCS

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Haggar
Haggar
QLD
1670 posts
QLD, 1670 posts
10 Oct 2006 12:35pm
I have managed to pick up a Gaastra mast 70% carbon content 4 metres long with an IMCS of 22.5 instead of the standard 19 for this size. Does this mean the mast is softer or harder then normal for that size ? I understand the formulae to calculate IMCS is

(MCS or deflection in mm ? at midpoint with 30 KG weight) x mast length(cm)/over 460 (cm)

This should mean that a larger deflection for a given size will give a higher IMCS and therefore for a 4 metre a 22.5 IMCS would be softer then a 19 IMCS, which would mean less power but more control in strong winds, or if I have this back to front, the rig will most probably have a more limited wind range in strong winds and be a handful ..... Can a mast guru please set me straight
hobie14t
hobie14t
QLD
259 posts
QLD, 259 posts
10 Oct 2006 12:41pm
I was under the impression that the higher the IMCS value, the stiffer a mast is.
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
10 Oct 2006 1:09pm
No.
MCS = L/D
IMCS = MCS x L^2/460^2
ie IMCS= L^3/D 460^2

So higher number = stiffer
elmo
elmo
WA
8894 posts
WA, 8894 posts
10 Oct 2006 12:39pm
Check this link

www.peterman.dk/start-windsurfing-gb01.htm

explains it all with comparisons between masts

Big thanks to Nebbian who originally posted this link.

Alby
oldie
oldie
VIC
356 posts
VIC, 356 posts
10 Oct 2006 3:46pm
Sick of limping home with a broken mast, so I pick up a nice strong Fiberspar 25 IMCS 460 30% carbon for my Gaastra 6.5.
Can't go wrong, as Gaastra recommend Fiberspar masts?
Aha, it is a "Quicktip", and I have ended up after much fiddling with the sail adjustable top at maximum extension to make it rig like on older masts. Does anybody have any expert experience with these sort of masts? (Reflex 3200) ?

Haggar
Haggar
QLD
1670 posts
QLD, 1670 posts
10 Oct 2006 7:45pm
Thanks Notwal, the formula works and this makes sense to me now. The May edition of Windusurf magazine has their formulae wrong, they should have spoken to you Now I just need to work our what to do with the mast
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
10 Oct 2006 6:24pm
quote:
Originally posted by Haggar

a 22.5 IMCS would be softer then a 19 IMCS, which would mean less power but more control in strong winds, or if I have this back to front, the rig will most probably have a more limited wind range in strong winds and be a handful ..... Can a mast guru please set me straight



Think you have this back to front as well, as the mast flexes downwind under load, the leach tightens up and the middle of the sail fills out. Surely that means a softer mast gives more power, and a stiff mast less????
Haggar
Haggar
QLD
1670 posts
QLD, 1670 posts
10 Oct 2006 9:27pm
Decrepit, I am no expert but what I have read as in the May version of Windsurf magazine says in summary

- mast is too stiff for the sail then it takes more effort to rig the sail with more downhaul and tension to get the correct shape and then on the water the mast wont flex enough to allow the leech to twist off and release pressure in gusts

- mast is too soft and there is less tension in the rig, gusts cause the mast to bend more easily so the leech twists more and releases more power

Off-course this is very simplistic, the link from elmo also adds some more light

greenleader
greenleader
QLD
5283 posts
QLD, 5283 posts
10 Oct 2006 9:52pm
confucious say,
there is correct setting for all sail and mast combination.
you need is goody eye and much knowledge of eagles wing.
rest is skill!
mkseven
mkseven
QLD
2315 posts
QLD, 2315 posts
11 Oct 2006 7:32am
quote:
Originally posted by decrepit

quote:
Originally posted by Haggar

a 22.5 IMCS would be softer then a 19 IMCS, which would mean less power but more control in strong winds, or if I have this back to front, the rig will most probably have a more limited wind range in strong winds and be a handful ..... Can a mast guru please set me straight



Think you have this back to front as well, as the mast flexes downwind under load, the leach tightens up and the middle of the sail fills out. Surely that means a softer mast gives more power, and a stiff mast less????



I think it is the opposite, do you're mast deflection tests and the centre of the sail dosent fill out. If the centre of the sail fills out under load this should create instability in gusts as it shifts the coe and lifts you. Where you often get the power is a softer bottom section can rig the sail slightly fuller.

I think the G70's were designed for the F1 Totalflow's and yes they were slightly stiffer than standard for the size as the sail had a 60-70cm tip extension so the remainder of the mast had to be apply for a sail of that size.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
11 Oct 2006 12:49pm
Sorry guys I'm not convinced, think about the line between mast tip and foot, without mast flex this passes thru center line of boom, when mast flexes downwind the line moves closer to downwind boom. This is also the line the sail has to follow, so as the mast flexes the sail gets more shape. That's why the tip has to flex to conteract the bottom of the sail powering up.
With your sail rigged get a mate to stand on the tip of the mast and push down on the foot. This simulates mast flex, watch what happens to the sail, leech tightens sail shapes up
mkseven
mkseven
QLD
2315 posts
QLD, 2315 posts
11 Oct 2006 4:39pm
quote:
Originally posted by decrepit

SThis simulates mast flex, watch what happens to the sail, leech tightens sail shapes up



It does? No you cant say because the mast is moving towards the downwind side of the boom that more fullness is being put into the sail. Remember the sail twists off and all that the whole sail dosent follow that line of the mast. I'm under the influence of no sleep so i'll have to think about this some more... where's Barry Spanier when you need him
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
11 Oct 2006 5:52pm
quote:
Originally posted by mkseven



It does?


Well I haven't got a sail rigged in front of me, and it's a while since I last did it, but I'm fairly sure that's what happened!

quote:

No you cant say because the mast is moving towards the downwind side of the boom that more fullness is being put into the sail. Remember the sail twists off and all that the whole sail dosent follow that line of the mast.


Agreed the head doesn't but the middle of the sail does, which is probably 70% - 90% of the sail depending on width of head.

mkseven
mkseven
QLD
2315 posts
QLD, 2315 posts
12 Oct 2006 7:32am
OK but it goes against all convention.

Just a final question, are you doing this with a raf sail and is it possible that it is taking up the cloth and setting the sail into the correct shape?

It's been ages since i've done the deflection test and never on a non cambered sail.
Haggar
Haggar
QLD
1670 posts
QLD, 1670 posts
12 Oct 2006 12:39pm
Had no idea I would cause so much mast debating
racycoot
racycoot
WA
315 posts
WA, 315 posts
12 Oct 2006 11:31am
ha ha he said mast debating!
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
12 Oct 2006 6:38pm
quote:
Originally posted by mkseven

OK but it goes against all convention.

Just a final question, are you doing this with a raf sail and is it possible that it is taking up the cloth and setting the sail into the correct shape?

It's been ages since i've done the deflection test and never on a non cambered sail.



Depends on whose convention?

Yep it's a wave sail, if you hadn't asked the question I was going to mention this anyway, as it won't show up to the same extent in a cambered sail, but you should still see the leach tighten I think and I'm sure the sail will still fill out a bit, but no where near as obvious as a wave sail does.

You had me doubting myself a bit, so I got the wife to stand on the tip before I went for a sail today, and it's as I said.

Note, this doesn't mean a heavier person should use a softer mast to get more power. As there will be more power in the sail to deflect the mast with a heavier person. It's probably the opposite, heavier rider needs a stiffer mast, to get the right deflection.

The other point of confusion may be a mix up with the effect of mast bend due to downhaul, that will cause more sail twist and less power.
mkseven
mkseven
QLD
2315 posts
QLD, 2315 posts
13 Oct 2006 11:45am
OK I have been thinking about this and short of going out and measuring it for myself I think you may be correct and I have confused leach twist/tension with the results of mast deflection. Yes it is much harder to see in a race sail (mine i almost cant see through the bloody thing for all the battens), that being why they are a race sail in the first place.

Yes bigger person stiffer mast, sail holds it's shape longer- dosent open the leach too much.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
13 Oct 2006 4:11pm
Thanks Mark, it's nice to have that sorted out, not that it's going to make much differnce to most people.
oldie
oldie
VIC
356 posts
VIC, 356 posts
16 Oct 2006 12:23pm
Most illuminating discussion, that's why sails rig all floppy at the top, even for all out speed sailing. But surely the lack of a strap extension on the top of all new sails is removing an extra tuning tool which would allow one to change the amount of twist off, say.
Dropping the sail 10 cm down the mast on my RAF Gaastra ends up with twice the downhaul tension to get the same sail shape ???
racycoot
racycoot
WA
315 posts
WA, 315 posts
16 Oct 2006 10:30am
quote:
Originally posted by oldie

... But surely the lack of a strap extension on the top of all new sails is removing an extra tuning tool which would allow one to change the amount of twist off, say...



Yes, but it sells more masts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply