Mistral Flow - Is there anything better?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Krisiz1
Krisiz1
WA
331 posts
WA, 331 posts
11 May 2009 3:17pm
I started sailing on a mistral flow in 02. My second one is about to de-lam (they get a lot of use) and I am wondering if there is anything that compares re ease of gybing, handling chop etc. I have tried quite a few other boards and quite frankly there is nothing that feels like a flow, sounds w4nky but its true! Does anyone sail a 08 flow who can compare them to the old ones?
I have read a few board reviews in American mags but I am sceptical about how impartial a mag could be, given they rely on board companies for most of their ad revenue.
nebbian
nebbian
WA
6277 posts
WA, 6277 posts
11 May 2009 5:05pm
There is nothing quite like it...

*miss my old one*
Goo Screw
Goo Screw
VIC
269 posts
VIC, 269 posts
11 May 2009 7:49pm
I think mine is an 03 blue 105 and she's a classic
She's done a 25.35 Alpha,been over 35kts and I can uphaul her in no wind.
I'll just keep saying that boards will have to come back to this shape one day
Jman
Jman
VIC
881 posts
VIC, 881 posts
11 May 2009 8:03pm
You are sure to get Bondy's attention with this topic! he knows every spec on every flow ever made
elmo
elmo
WA
8894 posts
WA, 8894 posts
11 May 2009 7:25pm
Got my 276 sitting in my shed, it's a beautiful thing
WINDY MILLER
WINDY MILLER
WA
3183 posts
WA, 3183 posts
11 May 2009 7:29pm
learnt on the green 286 115 ltr,,,it was a 2nd hand one from Hawaii Surf Rentals....
what a great board, so many happy memories, mainly at sandy point and pp bay ......untill it delamed
jp747
jp747
1553 posts
1553 posts
11 May 2009 7:57pm
i still keep my 266 custom have been told to sell it but nada[}:)] will and always be a keeper..great you asked cuz i don't think there is an all around board during it's time that is short of excellent in all conditions and will still be par with some of today's board..my opinion
Bondalucci
Bondalucci
VIC
1580 posts
VIC, 1580 posts
11 May 2009 10:04pm
Jman is right. I love my flow 266.

In 2005 my Flow got stolen (along with my van full of gear). It took me 1 1/2 years to find another one in A1 condition! (In that time I tried quite a few more recent boards including the Starboard Carve 99 and Tabou Rocket 95lt, but preferred the good old flow). I reckon it's perfect for Port Phillip Chop

A few months ago (4 years later), and with the help of a good cop, I got it back. Now I have 2. Here's the long and the short of it


Here is a section from windsurfing historian Greg Dunnett as he traced the design changes and their effect on performance over the years, shedding some light on the virtues of the flow:
......... We don’t have a Screamer 268 here, but we do have a Mistral Flow 266 which replaced it yet is essentially the same board, just tweaked very slightly. It came out in 1999. The main difference between this and the earlier chameleon (the Aegir) can best be seen by looking at the widths and nose rocker. Experimentation with chameleons had shown that increasing the nose rocker directly increased the versatility of the board, and the new freestyles (which had just started appearing on the scene) were proving that increasing a board’s width made it easier to sail. The Flow took the best of both these worlds and mixed them into a test winning board for 1999.

Since the Flow, the main change has been a steady year-on-year widening and shortening of board designs. This started as a return to pre-dedicated board widths, and then kept going to current levels. And we are talking significant figures here. The Sunset Slalom was 60cm wide but as kit got faster in the DSB age the widths came down to 53.5cm (Sputnik) or 54cm (Tiga). The Flow itself was only 56cm wide but since then boards have got decidedly more wide bodied and have expanded to around 62cm (Skate). The debate these days is whether boards have become too wide? No question it’s made modern kit easier to sail, but is it hampering gybing performance, overall speed and making them bouncy when sailing in chop and swell? From our findings the answer would appear to be yes, and there’s little doubt that the time will come that board design becomes narrower again, hailed as the latest, revolutionary thing. In fact, it’s happening already…

However, this is not to say that designers are just recycling old designs. The big change now is in length. All the older boards in this test - spanning almost 15 years - are between 265 & 275cm, but nowadays we’re in hitherto utterly uncharted waters. While the Skate is just **cm shorter at ***cm, we’re now into an age of designs which are truly radical and utterly different to anything that has been tried before.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary then, looking from the oldest to the most recent board in the test, three major

design changes have occurred, each equally important in their own way. They are:

1. The redistribution of volume from the nose to the tail, and the consequent repositioning of mast track and footstrap fittings.

2. Modernisation of rocker profiles (less tail rocker, more nose rocker starting earlier.)

3. Widths increasing & lengths diminishing.

So, what’s the verdict on how these changes have improved things - are the new boards better than the old boards? Well, the answer is quite revealing. To see how the various board designs we’ve described above actually feel to modern sailors, read the individual write ups. Our conclusions here will certainly make more sense when you’ve read those.

...And if you want something primarily for jumping, blasting and gybing, then the Flow is a wonderful little board to have fun on. So old boards are not necessarily worse than new boards, but they’re certainly very different.

This general point about the progress that has been made is illustrated very clearly by the fact that the biggest competition here to the Skate in terms of which board we would want to own is the Mistral Flow, which is only 5 years old anyway. But it’s clearly the best of the older boards in pretty much every respect, except perhaps ultimate top speed. But comparing the Flow to the Skate illustrates another fundamental change in thinking over the past few years. With the Flow the idea was still that one board could essentially do it all for the majority of short board sailors. Now things have firmly changed to the belief that the Skate (or equivalent) can cater pretty well for sailing from the top of a Force 3 to the bottom of a Force 5 - but you’re certainly going to need a smaller board for stronger winds (maybe 2) and maybe one for lighter winds as well. And perhaps a more speedy board too, if you have any ambition towards sailing very fast.



MISTRAL FLOW 266

- - - - - - - - - - -


Design: A pretty up-to-date looking plan shape and volume distribution. After concentrating all the volume towards the back with boards like the Tiga 268, the pendulum has now swung the other way quite a bit and the volume by now has ended up roughly evenly distributed between the front and back. The rocker profile on the Flow is similar to those that we termed "fast-tail all rounders" a few issues back. No tail rocker, quite a long rocker flat to get it planing early and give good speed, but then rising into a high nose so that it also jumps well.

We said then: It is predominantly a slalom freeride for blasting and enjoying a Force 4-5. But it’s equally at home on coastal waters where it performs more than reasonably as a wave slalom for throwing about in the waves or chop. In our opinion the best board around of this length and a contender for board of the year

We think now: The Flow is a peach of a board. It feels by far the most modern of the (old) boards here, and also the most balanced, refined and versatile. It is the only one that somehow combines a decent top speed and a blasting/cruising stance, with really good agility and manoeuvrability. It’s a great jumper, always ready to scoop up into the sky, and it’s a great gyber as well. Much happier than almost all the others here to bank over into a gybe from top speed without fear of the rails catching or spinning out. In short it’s fast yet truly throwaround. Unfortunately it also filled up with water pretty quick when we used it, due to a series of holes under the deckpads (that we hadn’t seen prior to use). The quoted weight of 11 kg was after a couple of sails, and by the time we worked out what was happening it weighed considerably more again.

Conclusion: There seem to be 2 main differences between the Flow and modern equivalents. Firstly, the very tip of the nose is extremely pointy and sharp, (which serves no purpose except to piece monofilm and look frightening) and the width. It’s 56cm wide, and any modern equivalent will be at least 59cm. As a result it’s probably just a little bit faster and more nimble than modern boards, but also a touch more difficult and technical to get going, as well as less easy to tack or perform any of the modern freestyle tricks. However, if you’ve got one of these boards in decent condition and are still happily sailing it, then who are we to argue with you?


-The whole article is interesting for those who like to follow the changes

Go the Flow
Wet Willy
Wet Willy
TAS
2317 posts
TAS, 2317 posts
11 May 2009 10:36pm
Dammit, don't tell me that!

I bought Nebbian's Flow and sold it again without even trying it!

Paul
Paul
WA
346 posts
WA, 346 posts
11 May 2009 11:46pm
The Exocet cross is the most similar board to the flow in regards to feel. the flows are so hard to beat overall.
i posted a while back about the comparisons so a quick summary is as follows.

Having a couple of working order flows to compare with many boards over the last 5 years, nothing had come too close as the flow comfort. I was thinking that there was no board that would compare until the last board we sailed back to back with the flow and that was the exocet cross. the new mistrals are different in ride to the older ones.

Don't take my word for it. You should try one if you can, but for my money the Cross is the next best thing to the flow, bar none.
ikw777
ikw777
QLD
2995 posts
QLD, 2995 posts
12 May 2009 9:46am
I have a Mistral Classic 103l which is the same design but tougher construction. I hope to keep it going for a few more years.
Zubby
Zubby
SA
896 posts
SA, 896 posts
12 May 2009 11:15am
What a great board the Flow was!!

The Thommen Cross-X series is very similar.
Krisiz1
Krisiz1
WA
331 posts
WA, 331 posts
12 May 2009 3:20pm
Thanks for your imput guys, although that does exacerbate my problem. I now have to look for another 2nd hand flow rather than just turning up to the shop with my credit card.

I started with on a' classic' then found a nice spearmint flow after the classic de-lamed. It is interesting to note that the classic has no screw vent, which may have contributed its early demise??

Does anyone know if it is possible to 'peel' off the de-lamed plastic outer and get the core fibreglassed?? It did some research via this forum on repairing a delamed board but didn't tackle it. If it's possible to glass it who does it??
WindmanV
WindmanV
VIC
825 posts
VIC, 825 posts
12 May 2009 5:34pm
Hi, Krisiz,

The first shipment of green Flows were noted for delaminating and many were replaced under warranty. This problem did not affect the later blue models.

As for a repair, 'phone some surfboard repairers to see if they can do the fix, but I think that you might have a problem with water-logged foam, which can never be rehabilitated. It would not take a repairer very long to cut off the deck and assess the damage, one way or another.

Hope this helps,

Regards,

WindmanV
Bondalucci
Bondalucci
VIC
1580 posts
VIC, 1580 posts
12 May 2009 7:18pm
Hi Lyle (although you were an F2 man... you're still right and still the guru),

The blue ones didn't delam because they were an epoxy costruction out of the cobra factory whereas the green were a thermoformed construction.

They rode differently too. (I sailed both head to head to see if I should up-grade to the blue) The green was smoother through chop and a bit looser 'cos it had a lot more V, more rail lift up forward and weren't as stiff. The blue ones were a tad lighter, had a flatter bottom shape and so were a bit faster, but a slightly harsher ride.

Unfortunately I never got to try the ones that followed (blue with green and black decal -Flow V95 and V105 etc) these were also epoxy from the cobra factory, were a bit shorter and had a more rounded nose.

I'd love to hear from anyone who got to compare the green flow (266,276) with the V95 or V105.
Goo Screw
Goo Screw
VIC
269 posts
VIC, 269 posts
12 May 2009 7:36pm
I have had my V105 out with the 02 blue which for memory was a 103l.
The 02 was harder on the rails going past the mast track where as the V105 are more tucked from before mast track,I think the V105 has a bit more V under the front foot straps and the mast track.
The V105 is noticeably more forgiving and slower.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15105 posts
WA, 15105 posts
12 May 2009 6:17pm
Krisiz1 said...

Thanks for your imput guys, although that does exacerbate my problem. I now have to look for another 2nd hand flow rather than just turning up to the shop with my credit card.

I started with on a' classic' then found a nice spearmint flow after the classic de-lamed. It is interesting to note that the classic has no screw vent, which may have contributed its early demise??

Does anyone know if it is possible to 'peel' off the de-lamed plastic outer and get the core fibreglassed?? It did some research via this forum on repairing a delamed board but didn't tackle it. If it's possible to glass it who does it??


I hate to disagree with other Flow owners, but you should take a few newer boards out and see what you think, if you haven't already done it. You will probably find a board that's close enough to a Flow for you. My favorite for normal freeride type use is a Mistral Syncro, but there are plenty of boards out there that are good.

I have a 276 blue flow, which was the 'custom' construction; AKA normal epoxy/polystyrene/divinycell sandwich, instead if the plastic ASA construction used in the green versions.

I think the advantage they have over newer boards is that they are narrower compared to a current board of the same volume. This might help in chop, depending on your weight. I found the blue one I have feels fast, but I haven't really compared it against any other boards in the same conditions.

One thing I do believe though is that the modern wider boards are much nicer to get going, probably due just to the width. The Flow on the other hand took a little bit of coaxing to get going.

Your ASA board doesn't have a divinycell layer, so if you were to try glassing it it wouldn't have the strength it needs. If you wanted to add the divinycell layer then you are probably looking at spending more than a good second hand 'blue' flow would cost you.

What are you after in a new board?

Krisiz1
Krisiz1
WA
331 posts
WA, 331 posts
13 May 2009 2:16pm
Thanks Formulanova. The only thing i'm looking for in a new board is the "new". I just love the feel of the Flow. I have compared the blue ones and prefer the earlier plastic ones shape and feel. Coincidentally when I was looking to buy the second 2nd hand flow Jez at 2nd wind had a blue one and the peppermint one and even though the blue one was $250 dearer he said the older ones ride better which I later proved to be correct (not that I doubted Jez at the time!)
Something I thought of today, was perhaps I should just go to a custom board maker and say "make me one this shape" and hand him one of my old flows ??
BTW I do have an open mind about any other brands, as that would make this thing much easier but I can only go on the comparisons I've made to date, and given the feedback I have kinda been convinced the flow rates fairly well
Al Planet
Al Planet
TAS
1548 posts
TAS, 1548 posts
13 May 2009 6:30pm
I had the runt of that litter,(85l) maybe a 260? didn't like it much anyway, also had a mistral screamer from similar era which was better. My favorites from that era were the fanatics (fly, gecko and hawk), pity about the trim box though.

Its fortunate that the board you like was so popular, shouldn't be to hard to find a replacement.
PsyberG
PsyberG
VIC
15 posts
VIC, 15 posts
13 May 2009 7:01pm
I used to have one of the very early Mistral Screamers (made from CHS, with the funny early planing concave up the nose) and after many years it developed a crack across the top deck under the front footstraps so thought I'd try to find something similar 2nd hand. I ended up with a blue Flow. The Screamer seems to have been more 'planted', the V in the tail made for a smoother and safer feeling ride over Port Phillip Bay chop. The Flow took a little while to get used to, it seems to have a flat bottom in the tail, yet a little more rocker in the nose. This tends to result in a harsher ride and the board is definately more flighty at speed.

Both boards seem to be quite fast when pushed to their limits relative to many much newer boards out there based on drag races, I have managed a GPS top of 30 knt with the Flow, not too bad for Port Phillip Bay conditions. Would love to try it on something flat like SP.
Bondalucci
Bondalucci
VIC
1580 posts
VIC, 1580 posts
13 May 2009 7:39pm
The green flows were smooth like the '98 screamers, but even better. (better pads, strap positioning and rail shape)
The blue flows (customs) were definitely a bumpier ride, but still not as bumpy as some of the other boards.

I've also considered taking my green flow to a custom board maker and getting it reproduced. I'd love to try the same bottom shape but at a kilo or so lighter (and with a shorter, rounded nose)
- might have to look at the 103lt rather than my trusty 93lt 'cos I don't think I'm getting any lighter

I've also heard that some of the Fanatics in the early 2000's were pretty highly regarded for similar characteristics.
Dr Gas
Dr Gas
QLD
144 posts
QLD, 144 posts
13 May 2009 9:54pm
Ahh the Mistral Flow. I bought a brand new green 276 about 10 years ago and I still ride it all the time in the sloppy beach break waves at Kawana, Sunshine Coast Qld. Goes best with a 6-7 metre sail. If the wind gets stronger I ride a smaller board.
It was the first board I could really gybe. I've got lots of other boards now, bigger, smaller, faster, lighter, but in terms of all round versatility and easy riding, the Flow is still a winner. Fortunately mine didn't delaminate, lots did, but the non-slip is hopeless. ?Any suggestions on re-surfacing the deck. I am keeping this board forever!
Dr Gas
Old Salty
Old Salty
VIC
1271 posts
VIC, 1271 posts
13 May 2009 11:16pm
Sounds like an obession to me. Caught Bondy on his Flow one day( well almost) catapulted just before I passed him.
Bondalucci
Bondalucci
VIC
1580 posts
VIC, 1580 posts
14 May 2009 12:09am
Dr Gas said...

Ahh the Mistral Flow. I bought a brand new green 276 about 10 years ago and I still ride it all the time in the sloppy beach break waves at Kawana, Sunshine Coast Qld. Goes best with a 6-7 metre sail. If the wind gets stronger I ride a smaller board.
It was the first board I could really gybe. I've got lots of other boards now, bigger, smaller, faster, lighter, but in terms of all round versatility and easy riding, the Flow is still a winner. Fortunately mine didn't delaminate, lots did, but the non-slip is hopeless. ?Any suggestions on re-surfacing the deck. I am keeping this board forever!
Dr Gas


Mask off area, paint on a thin coat of resin, and throw some caster sugar over it. leave it to dry. wash off excess. job done.

or
you can use gorilla grip (surfboard pads) in required area.
(I've also seen some people cut skate board deck grip into appropriate shapes/strips and it sticks straight on)
or
you can give it to me ('cos I'll be wearing booties over winter! )

Good luck.

Waiting4wind
Waiting4wind
NSW
1871 posts
NSW, 1871 posts
14 May 2009 10:38pm
I replaced my 268 Screamer with a 2003 JP FSW 91. The 03 FSW in particular was an excellent board and I felt better than my Screamer (I did like the Screamer). The JP FSW was faster, planed way earlier, just as easy to to gybe but a little slashier and as smooth in chop. It was a little more technical to trim and set up. But if you go down the FSW path for a Flow replacement the 03's the go. The 02, 04 to 06 were quite different.
Bondalucci
Bondalucci
VIC
1580 posts
VIC, 1580 posts
14 May 2009 11:44pm
Waiting4wind said...

I replaced my 268 Screamer with a 2003 JP FSW 91. The 03 FSW in particular was an excellent board and I felt better than my Screamer (I did like the Screamer). The JP FSW was faster, planed way earlier, just as easy to to gybe but a little slashier and as smooth in chop. It was a little more technical to trim and set up. But if you go down the FSW path for a Flow replacement the 03's the go. The 02, 04 to 06 were quite different.


W4W,
Can you please post a pic of the board you regard as the JP 03 FSW, 'cos it's hard to tell from the mags etc depending if the mag is late '02 or early '03 etc.

Also was there a 101 JP FSW in the same model?
jp747
jp747
1553 posts
1553 posts
14 May 2009 9:50pm
Wet Willy said...

Dammit, don't tell me that!

I bought Nebbian's Flow and sold it again without even trying it!




now why in this world would someone do that???
Waiting4wind
Waiting4wind
NSW
1871 posts
NSW, 1871 posts
15 May 2009 11:31pm
Bondalucci said...

Waiting4wind said...

I replaced my 268 Screamer with a 2003 JP FSW 91. The 03 FSW in particular was an excellent board and I felt better than my Screamer (I did like the Screamer). The JP FSW was faster, planed way earlier, just as easy to to gybe but a little slashier and as smooth in chop. It was a little more technical to trim and set up. But if you go down the FSW path for a Flow replacement the 03's the go. The 02, 04 to 06 were quite different.


W4W,
Can you please post a pic of the board you regard as the JP 03 FSW, 'cos it's hard to tell from the mags etc depending if the mag is late '02 or early '03 etc.

Also was there a 101 JP FSW in the same model?



I'm trying to find a pic of my old board but no luck so far. Got the following from the JP Archive. Looks like the biggest FSW for 03 was a 98L

FSW 91 254 59 91L
6,7
14,8
FSW 27
PB
5,0-6,2
4,5-6,5

FSW 98 256 61 98L
6,8

FSW 29
PB
5,4-6,6
5,0-7,2
Krisiz1
Krisiz1
WA
331 posts
WA, 331 posts
16 May 2009 12:17pm
I'm getting a "flow" custom made. Will report on the result when I get it.
ikw777
ikw777
QLD
2995 posts
QLD, 2995 posts
16 May 2009 7:47pm
I will be very interested to this when it arrives. Do you have an ETA?
Krisiz1
Krisiz1
WA
331 posts
WA, 331 posts
16 May 2009 11:14pm
ikw777 said...

I will be very interested to this when it arrives. Do you have an ETA?

I have to drop off a flow for him to copy so don't yet but I am pretty excited. Will keep you posted
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply