quote:
Originally posted by CJW
I've got a question, have starboard improved their footstraps yet? My Hypersonic has by far the worst footstraps of any board i've ever come across, including late 80's crappers. I'd also rate it's layup as 'suspect'.
You cant rate boards on the quality of footstraps, if you dont think you will like them in the first place dont put them on and sell them to help fund the straps you do like.
When I first got my hypersonic I felt the same way, I guess the construction gave the board a slightly different feel which I was a little suspect of. After using it for a while, sailing it hard through some wild conditions and some big crashes I now love their construction. IMO it is one of if not the best construction of the big players in the market. If you think starboard wood is fragile dont get a race/slalom board from the others, you will be in tears or doing lots of small repairs often.
I was looking at getting a kombat at one stage and did think that the use of a US fin was a bit weird but realistically it dosen't need anything else with the added benefit that you can use the fins if needed from you're smaller waveboards. It is one area where starboard are innovative- only using two finbox styles through their whole range deep/tuttle and US box. Other brands you change from a slalom board to something a little more suitable for the chop and none of you're fins fit

.
My small gripes are I find the footpads a little slippery on my hyper, and the finbox could be a better fit. However I prefer the finbox to be a bit big where you can build it up rather than sanding my fins down as I had to do with an f2 just to get them to fit.
It is only the second season of slalom 42- irrespective compare it to slalom then. There are alot more disciplines now making it tougher for manufacturers- f2 could have claimed similar with dunky's clean sweep of race, slalom, wave plus production speed (Whitey). But again starboard are doing it with production boards- not hand grenades.
JP hahahaha