Windsurfing caution

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
sburlo
sburlo
NT
166 posts
NT, 166 posts
24 Nov 2007 9:16am
Pasted this from the kitesurfing section:
Slip, Slop, Slap and dont forget the sunglasses and lip balm.

Jeremy wrote:

I read with interest an article in the NOV 2007 medical journal of Australia regarding a 35 yo male professional kite surfer who died from metastatic melanoma. He presented with multiple liver lesions. The primary was found to be from his eye,more specifically his retina. The kite surfer never wore sunglasses. Melanoma from the retina spreads more quickly than skin lesions as their are no lymphatics in the retina. Skin melanoma's might spread first to a lymph node (surgical treatment still reasonably effective ), whereas from the retina it goes straight into your blood stream to your liver ( your cactus).

Kiting exposes you to direct UV radiation as well as reflected. You can reduce your risk of melanoma by wearing sunglasses.
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
24 Nov 2007 12:47pm
Obviously applies to all outdoor sports....

Would kiters be more susceptible because of the direction of vision, (ie:- looking up toward sky?)
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
24 Nov 2007 4:17pm
I always wear sunnies when windsurfing. Mainly because I am short sighted so having pescription sunnies helps me see where I am going.

Its way too bright for me otherwise too.

lanky
lanky
QLD
213 posts
QLD, 213 posts
24 Nov 2007 5:55pm
I found when I was sailing my self I was ok but when I was working teaching others how to windsurf I got sunburned once so now I wear sunnies to teach.
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
24 Nov 2007 10:25pm
I think Elmo might be interested in this.
By the look of the picture in his avatar he gets way too much sun.
He is bright bloody red!!!
Surely someone must have noticed that by now and given him some good advice.

Elmo, cover up son before it's too late.
goodbrewster
goodbrewster
55 posts
55 posts
24 Nov 2007 11:13pm
Yes, flying a kite exposes one to more direct sunlight than windsurfing. I know this first hand. The trouble one finds would be that you can't often co-ordinate the wind direction with the time of day. Often your kite eclipses the sun. When riding, though, you don't look at the kite much as the board, skates or skis and their direction need more visual contact, but when flying a trainer you have little else to attract your attention. I never wear sunglasses while windsurfing and seldom have trouble with the sun blinding me. If it happens, it's usually sunset sailing and then you are exposed to less UV than when the sun is overhead. Thanks, though, for the caution warning. I do spend some time with kites.
MikeyS
MikeyS
VIC
1509 posts
VIC, 1509 posts
26 Nov 2007 12:04pm
I certainly wouldn't try to discourage anyone from wearing good quality sunnies to protect their eyes. But I think you need to put this particular case in perspective. Intraocular (eye) cancers are quite rare compared to the skin cancers that kill heaps of Australians, especially fair skinned, never tanning ones like me.

Sounds like this guy lived it pretty hard.

I sourced this from the Florida Kitesurf Association website (thanks guys) who obtained what I understand to be the oroginal journal article:

Stefan Buchholz and George Rudan
MJA 2007; 187 (10): 590-591
Clinical record
A 35-year-old British man was admitted with a 2-week history of abdominal discomfort, fatigue and intermittent high fevers associated with drenching night sweats. He reported having returned to Australia 2 months before presentation from a 12-year around-the-world trip, having travelled extensively for 6 months through South-East Asia and northern Australia. Before that, he had been to Argentina, the Maldives, Egypt, India and Cambodia, where he had worked as a professional kitesurfing instructor.

His past medical history was unremarkable and he was not on regular medication. His social history revealed intravenous heroin addiction in his early 20s. He had consumed more than 80 g of alcohol daily for a number of years, with occasional binges, until recently, when drinking alcohol provoked nausea and vomiting.

The patient appeared unwell with a tympanic temperature of 40??C. He was fair-skinned and of muscular build. Physical examination showed conjunctival jaundice but no evidence of needle tracks, rashes, finger clubbing, lymphadenopathy or suspicious cutaneous lesions. Tender hepatomegaly was noted, but no ascites or splenomegaly. Findings of cardiac, respiratory and neurological examinations were normal.

Abnormal laboratory findings on admission were: albumin concentration, 29 g/L (reference range [RR], 33?C47 g/L); alkaline phosphatase titre, 164 U/L (RR, 30?C115 U/L); ??-glutamyl transferase titre, 207 U/L (RR, 0?C45 U/L); alanine aminotransferase titre, 76 U/L (RR, 0?C40 U/L); aspartate aminotransferase titre, 279 U/L (RR, 0?C40 U/L); lactate dehydrogenase titre, 4268 U/L (RR, 100?C225 U/L); white cell count, 13.4 ?? 109/L (RR, 4.0?C11.0 ?? 109/L); absolute neutrophil count, 9.7 ?? 109/L (RR, 1.5?C6.0 ?? 109/L). There was no evidence of thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction or coagulopathy. Findings on abdominal ultrasonography the day before admission were reported to be normal.

Despite there being few clinical features to suggest a source of sepsis apart from the hepatomegaly, because of his travel history and previous history of injecting drug use, a wide variety of infectious diseases, including subacute bacterial endocarditis, typhoid, malaria, and viral hepatitis, were all initially considered in the differential diagnosis. Multiple sets of blood cultures, urine and stool samples were sent for microscopy, culture and sensitivity. Three sets of thick and thin films for malaria as well as a test for Plasmodium falciparum antigen were negative.

In view of the clinical hepatomegaly, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen was performed, which was reported as strongly suggestive of microabscesses (Box). The presumptive diagnosis at this stage was a tropical pyogenic liver abscess, although military tuberculosis and candidiasis were also considered.

Intravenous therapy with flucloxacillin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole was initiated. The ceftriaxone was subsequently changed to meropenem, and the ciprofloxacin ceased 5 days after there had been no growth on any cultures.

Serological tests for a wide variety of pathogens and diseases were also performed, including: HIV 1 and 2; hepatitis viruses A, B and C; cytomegalovirus; Epstein?CBarr virus; Q fever; brucellosis; cryptococcosis; Entamoeba histolytica; Ross River virus; Dengue virus; flavivirus; leptospirosis; schistosomiasis; cysticercosis; and melioidosis. Results for all of these eventually returned negative.

Despite the antibiotics and fluids given intravenously, the patient??s condition deteriorated over the course of 6 days and he developed hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, pleural effusions and peripheral oedema. He also continued to spike high temperatures daily, but repeated blood cultures were sterile. A CT scan performed a week after the initial CT scan suggested enlargement of the liver lesions.

Although hepatic abscesses were still considered most likely, given the markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase titre and lack of clinical improvement with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, alternative diagnoses, in particular malignancy, were also considered. We therefore performed a core biopsy of the liver under ultrasound guidance. There was no evidence of pus, and the lesional tissue showing strong monoclonal antibody staining against Melan-A and HMB-45 confirmed liver infiltration by a poorly differentiated malignant melanoma.

Repeat physical examination included dilated pupil fundoscopy, which showed a brown, dome-shaped subretinal lesion just below the left optic disc, most suggestive of a primary choroidal melanoma. The patient said that he never used sunglasses while kitesurfing.

Discussion
Exposure of the unprotected eye to sunlight or sunlamps is an important risk factor for the development of intraocular melanoma.1 The incidence of ocular melanoma in dark-eyed individuals is lower, probably because they are less sensitive to solar radiation, or less is transmitted to the choroids.2

Uveal melanoma (affecting the iris, ciliary body, and choroids) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in the Western world, affecting six to eight adults per million each year. Although fewer than 2% of patients show evidence of metastatic spread at presentation, over 40% will eventually die from widespread disease.3

Most intraocular melanomas are initially asymptomatic. Tumour enlargement may then cause distortion of the pupil (iris melanoma), blurred vision (ciliary body melanoma), or decreased visual acuity caused by either central growth close to the macula or secondary retinal detachment (choroidal melanoma). Because the uveal tract is a vascular structure without lymphatic channels, tumour spread occurs primarily by either local extension or by haematogenous dissemination. The first site of systemic metastases is the liver, although spread to other organs such as lung, bone, and subcutaneous sites have been described.3

Metastasis of melanoma to the liver, although rare, can produce a dramatic initial presentation with fulminant hepatitis, shock, and multisystem organ failure.4 An elevated lactate dehydrogenase titre is one of the most predictive factors for metastatic spread and decreased survival in patients with malignant melanoma, with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 92% in detecting disease progression to stage IV melanoma.5

Extraocular extension and metastatic spread are associated with an extremely poor prognosis, and response rates with contemporary single-agent chemotherapy are generally below 10%. A recently published study investigated the use of chemotherapy with intra-arterial hepatic fotemustine.6 Median survival rates were among the longest reported, with an overall response rate of 36%, a median overall survival of 15 months, and a 2-year survival rate of 29%.

Our patient was scheduled for three cycles of intravenous fotemustine therapy, but developed significant tumour lysis syndrome with intractable hyperkalaemia. He died shortly after the second cycle, only 28 days after being admitted to hospital. The final diagnosis was hepatic failure secondary to metastatic melanoma from an intraocular primary melanoma. An autopsy was not performed.

Coronal reconstruction computed tomography image of the abdomen showing hepatomegaly with numerous low-density lesions scattered throughout both lobes of the liver


Competing interests
None identified.
Author details
Stefan Buchholz, MD, MRCP(UK), Medical Registrar; currently, Basic Physician Trainee, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, QLD
George Rudan, MB BS, FRACP, Physician and Cardiologist, and Director of Physician Training
Department of Cardiology, Manly District Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Correspondence: stefanbuchholzAThotmail.com
References
Tucker MA, Shields JA, Hartge P, et al. Sunlight exposure as risk factor for intraocular malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 789-792. <PubMed>
Vajdic CM, Kricker A, Giblin M, et al. Incidence of ocular melanoma in Australia from 1990 to 1998. Int J Cancer 2003; 105: 117-122. <PubMed>
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. Assessment of metastatic disease status at death in 435 patients with large choroidal melanoma in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS): COMS report no. 15. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 670-676. <PubMed>
Te HS, Schiano TD, Kahaleh M, et al. Fulminant hepatic liver failure secondary to malignant melanoma: case report and review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 262-266. <PubMed>
Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3635-3648. <PubMed>
Peters S, Voelter V, Zografos L, et al. Intra-arterial hepatic fotemustine for the treatment of liver metastases from uveal melanoma: experience in 101 patients. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 578-583. <PubMed>
(Received 13 Jun 2007, accepted 12 Aug 2007)

https://www.mja.com.au/public/issues...c10671_fm.html
Arlo
Arlo
SA
139 posts
SA, 139 posts
26 Nov 2007 7:40pm
If you where contacts a lot of them protect you from UVA/B; still thinking about wearing sunnies though as the polarised kind cut out a lot of the glare off the water; you just end up with panda eyes.
shadow
shadow
WA
93 posts
WA, 93 posts
27 Nov 2007 9:16am
One of the best purchases of last summer was a pair of tinted wraparound safety glasses from Bunnings.
Lightweight, UV400, shatterproof, fifteen bucks.
They may not be polarised, but they never fog up and they shed salt water and I won't cry if I lose them in the surf.
And my eyes are happier!
mathew
mathew
QLD
2172 posts
QLD, 2172 posts
27 Nov 2007 10:40am
shadow said...

One of the best purchases of last summer was a pair of tinted wraparound safety glasses from Bunnings.
Lightweight, UV400, shatterproof, fifteen bucks.
They may not be polarised, but they never fog up and they shed salt water and I won't cry if I lose them in the surf.
And my eyes are happier!


good tip, thanks
Sailhack
Sailhack
VIC
5000 posts
VIC, 5000 posts
27 Nov 2007 1:41pm
Nah, you need polarised!!!

So you can see what's under you in the water.........(or not?!?)
Paul Kelf
Paul Kelf
WA
678 posts
WA, 678 posts
27 Nov 2007 3:01pm
I wear prescription polarised Sunnies in summer when sailing on the river without any problem.
Yesterday at Cervantes I had to ditch the sunnies because the chop becomes see through and very scary, you lose perspective of the surface.
It must be the clearer water up there because that's the second year I've had the same problem there.
I wear contacts in winter and maybe I will have to use them all year round but with plain sunnies in summer.
whippingboy
whippingboy
WA
1104 posts
WA, 1104 posts
27 Nov 2007 4:53pm
I always wear sunnies, but sometimes the polaroids give you a little bit too much information.
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
27 Nov 2007 7:50pm
I think what's more important here is the apparent lack of care this person took of his wellbeing over many years which was apparent in his heroin addiction and then the 80grms of alcohol consumed daily.
That would equate to about one and a half litres of beer daily, and that was said to be "on average", so there were probably many days that exceded this.
People that drink that much rarely take much care in whatever else they live on and the remainder of their diet is usually hamburgers and chips, or whatever the hotel or next door pie shop sells. He probably thought that since he was muscular then everything had been taken care of, but that is not the case.
The fact is that people have cancer cells in their bodies all the time but your body is able to dispose of them. But to do this it needs the right vitamins and minerals to keep the defensive mechanisms in top shape.
The easiest way to do this is the fruit and vegies etc as per the numerous advertisements. If you don't do this then second best is probably to supplement your diet with vitamin and mineral pills.
This will not guarantee you wont get cancer but it very much improves your chances of not coming down with it. Life is all just a matter of keeping the odds in your favour.

What he should have kept in mind was the body he was abusing in his early years was the same body that he would have to live in when he got older.
As it turned out he didn't even get that far.


lango
lango
14 posts
14 posts
27 Nov 2007 11:32pm
On the contrary pweedas, sounds like this guy lived more in 35 years than most people do in a lifetime. A 12 year round the world trip participating in his favourite pastime, lucky bastard.

And for the record, nowhere does it say he was addicted to heroin, and the average alcoholic consumption in Australia, according to the ABS, is around 27mls per day.

pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
28 Nov 2007 12:17am
lango said...

On the contrary pweedas, sounds like this guy lived more in 35 years than most people do in a lifetime. A 12 year round the world trip participating in his favourite pastime, lucky bastard.

And for the record, nowhere does it say he was addicted to heroin, and the average alcoholic consumption in Australia, according to the ABS, is around 27mls per day.




Re heroin addiction, the medical report said just that.;

"His social history revealed intravenous heroin addiction in his early 20s. He had consumed more than 80 g of alcohol daily for a number of years, with occasional binges, until recently, when drinking alcohol provoked nausea and vomiting."


I do agree though that it certainly sounds like he enjoyed himself while he was around.
(Maybe i'm just jealous)
But I think he still could have enjoyed all that he did and maybe more and for much longer if he had looked after himself a bit better.
If you make your enjoyment of life dependent on drugs and alcohol then you are missing out on what life itself has to offer.
You don't need drugs and alcohol to kitesurf, windsurf, motocross, fly aeroplanes, race hot rods, ...... well, anything really.
A few drinks afterwards yes, but over 1.5 litres per day?
That's just pandering to an addiction and can only end one way.


Wet Willy
Wet Willy
TAS
2317 posts
TAS, 2317 posts
28 Nov 2007 11:15am
EYE CANCER???? YUUUUUUUUCK!!!!

Hey you could halve the risk by always sailing with one eye closed. Just remember to change eyes when you change tacks...

Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
28 Nov 2007 1:43pm
Wet Willy said...

EYE CANCER???? YUUUUUUUUCK!!!!

Hey you could halve the risk by always sailing with one eye closed. Just remember to change eyes when you change tacks...




Or elimate the risk by having your eyeballs removed. Plenty of men who died of testicular cancer would be alive today if they had been castrated as a baby.



Wet Willy
Wet Willy
TAS
2317 posts
TAS, 2317 posts
28 Nov 2007 5:32pm
The man's a thinker...
MikeyS
MikeyS
VIC
1509 posts
VIC, 1509 posts
28 Nov 2007 6:10pm
Wet Willy said...

The man's a thinker...


Yep, that problem could have been avoided by having his brain removed as a baby. A life free from worry and angst. Pure bliss.
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
28 Nov 2007 5:01pm
Mobydisc said...


Or elimate the risk by having your eyeballs removed. Plenty of men who died of testicular cancer would be alive today if they had been castrated as a baby.






Good thinking Moby!
I'll keep an eye out for you.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply