masts?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
stupollard
stupollard
NSW
10 posts
NSW, 10 posts
26 Jun 2008 3:21pm
I need a new mast for an 08 zen 4.9 and 04 search 5.8 (both 430)

Obviously the masts on the net are much cheaper than in a shop. Does anyone know if any of these cheaper masts (gun, loft or billow) will suit the bend profiles of these sails?

or should i just quit complaining and spend the dollars???
choco
choco
SA
4186 posts
SA, 4186 posts
26 Jun 2008 3:06pm
Just check your sails imcs the Loft/Gun masts are great and have good warranty from 12-24 months.
from loft site;
Loftmasts are carefully controlled in design and construction to have "constant-curve" flex character. All Loftmasts measure 64% bend at base (lower 1/4), 76% bend at tip (upper 1/4).

ejmack
ejmack
VIC
1308 posts
VIC, 1308 posts
26 Jun 2008 4:14pm
stupollard - May not be of much help to you but, the latest boards magazine have done a test (measured stiffness , bend curve & weight) of the major brands in the 400-460 range. Ezzy, Fibrespar, Gun, Maui, MK, Powerex, Simmer... etc, etc.. Quite interesting and possibly worth a read if your trying to find a good match.
dism
dism
NSW
660 posts
NSW, 660 posts
26 Jun 2008 5:26pm
There is a few bend characteristic threads floating around here, try a search

I think NP and North are the same sorta mast bends, so maybe North are an alternative?

Gun (I think) and Loft are constant curve, so prob wont suit the NP's


Anyone got any info on these (new?) Billows masts (selling on ebay and via a website in Aus)?

Thats why I plan to stay away from the big names, to mast and component specific

Good luck tracking down a cheap mast

P.C_simpson
P.C_simpson
WA
1492 posts
WA, 1492 posts
26 Jun 2008 4:59pm
Billows masts look cheap and nasty, those guys have a website too, not much going on, think i would try to get hold of a Pryde mast for your sail, bit more expensive but will work properly, a cheap mast in a good sail is like putting a daewoo motor in a V8 supercar, yer it will go around the track, but one lap would be all you could take..
Bender
Bender
WA
2236 posts
WA, 2236 posts
26 Jun 2008 5:05pm
I think you will have to stick with a pryde mast for a pryde sail
Haircut
Haircut
QLD
6491 posts
QLD, 6491 posts
26 Jun 2008 8:10pm
2006 powerex skinny wave 85 percenter i got works great with 2008 NP alpha
Poida
Poida
WA
1922 posts
WA, 1922 posts
26 Jun 2008 8:55pm
Bender said...

I think you will have to stick with a pryde mast for a pryde sail


the search is a pryde isnt it?
would work best on a pryde mast (circa 2004)

what brand is the zen?
sflack
sflack
VIC
574 posts
VIC, 574 posts
26 Jun 2008 11:11pm
What are peoples view on PowerEX Skinnys?? I thinkin about buying one... Prob either the 85% or the 60%

Whats do you guys and gals reckon?!
dism
dism
NSW
660 posts
NSW, 660 posts
26 Jun 2008 11:19pm
Thanks John, that answered many of my questions

Hopefully we can get some user comments soonish, as it'll be good to have another reasonable priced mast seller in the Aust market (NP is a ripoff)


NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
27 Jun 2008 1:43am
Haircut said...

2006 powerex skinny wave 85 percenter i got works great with 2008 NP alpha


Powerex used to claim a 12% bend. NPs are typically about 14 or 15% so your Alpha is probably setting a little flatter than designed &/or not as free in the leach. The Alpha I believe falls between the Combat and the Search (or whatever its called now) for power. I think for freestyle power is a good thing as long as it depowers for rig trickery.

I have a very light NP wave 400 you can try if you want to see the difference.
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
27 Jun 2008 10:54am
An article in a recent pommy windsurfing magazine looked at this article, magazine kindly donated by forum member Katapult. They tested a large number of sails with different masts. The authors said the test was one of the most time consuming and difficult ones they have done.

In the final analysis they found that most sails from most brands worked better on masts that were not the recommended masts.

If anyone wants the article I can scan it and then post it. My scanner does not have the greatest of resolutions so it may not be legible as there is a fair bit of text in it.



sorse
sorse
NSW
509 posts
NSW, 509 posts
27 Jun 2008 10:54am
If your going to pimp your site on seabreeze why not pay to sponsor it like the rest of the expensive companies Johno??
sick_em_rex
sick_em_rex
NSW
1601 posts
NSW, 1601 posts
27 Jun 2008 11:51am
fair go Sorse, I don't think he was pimping his site. He was just responding to a question that was posed to him. Agreed he did put his website address up but don't be too harsh, he was just explaining what the situation is behind the origins of the masts.
And before you ask, no, I have nothing to do with the masts nor do I know the guy who imports them.
sorse
sorse
NSW
509 posts
NSW, 509 posts
27 Jun 2008 12:21pm
My apologise's I didn't think I was being harsh I hope it didn't come out that way..
Sorry guys :-)
GeoffS
GeoffS
NSW
49 posts
NSW, 49 posts
28 Jun 2008 11:01pm
Oi, Sorse. What are you doing over here. Get back on the Dark Side where you belong.
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
29 Jun 2008 8:09pm
I just realised that the Alpha IS the new Search so, Haircut, that sail is meant to be a drafthorse. With that Powerex in it you have depowered it a bit.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
29 Jun 2008 11:07pm
ejmack said...

stupollard - May not be of much help to you but, the latest boards magazine have done a test (measured stiffness , bend curve & weight) of the major brands in the 400-460 range. Ezzy, Fibrespar, Gun, Maui, MK, Powerex, Simmer... etc, etc.. Quite interesting and possibly worth a read if your trying to find a good match.


That article left me even more confused, especially with comments like some sails working better on a different manufacturer's mast or even a different length than the recommended. As they said themselves it opens a big can of worms.

You'd think that a NP sail on an NP mast would be the safe bet though, and said article agrees, I'd stick with that. Note that NP masts are flex-top ("progressive flex") which they do promote a bit so I guess lean towards them.

From the mag: Powerex RD 85 and Gun Select RD 100 bend similar to the NP masts (will the Zen rig on an Reduced Diameter mast?).

Of course lean towards satisfying the needs of the Zen as you will likely have it longer than the '04 sail.

Disclaimer: My kit is completely random.
sorse
sorse
NSW
509 posts
NSW, 509 posts
30 Jun 2008 10:38am
Hey geoffs I do windsurf as well, it's where I started way back at 8 years old :-)
I wish we had more strong breezes here as I would get out on the windsurf gear more often :-)
GazMan
GazMan
WA
848 posts
WA, 848 posts
6 Aug 2008 5:27pm
I have the two issues of Boards magazine in digital format where they tested a range of SD and RD masts (May 2007 430cm test & April 2008 400/460cm test). I use downloadable software called 'Zinio reader' to open the digital mags and from what I understand, I am able to give away at least three free copies of each mag to 'friends' (never tried it before though!). If anyone is interested, send me your email address via Seabreeze (email link above).

Also refer to my recent post in Seabreeze General forum thread entitled 'skinny masts' with links to interesting info re masts.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
7 Aug 2008 5:37pm
Going back to flex top/constant-curve masts....

Is the difference mostly going to be tension in the leach,
which would be moving your wind range higher or lower for the sail?

Are there other considerations before mismatching sails and masts?
bd123
bd123
WA
46 posts
WA, 46 posts
7 Aug 2008 3:53pm
I'm thinking of getting two Severne S-1 sails, a 5.0 and a 5.9. I will need to get RDM masts and was wondering if this would work. Get a 430 Red Line RDM and just a 400 Redline RDM top. Use the 430 with the 5.9 and for the 5.0 use the 430 bottom and 400 top, making 415cm. The Luff for the 5.0 S-1 is 421. Would this work well, or do you have to use the recommended 400 Red Line RDM for the 5.0 S-1?
GazMan
GazMan
WA
848 posts
WA, 848 posts
8 Aug 2008 1:14am
To evlPanda,

Possibly difficult questions for anyone to answer briefly. There was an earlier mast test article in May 2007 Boards that I felt was easier to understand and more comprehensive than their most recent mast test in April 2008 Boards. I have digital copies of both mags and can arrange for you to get a free copy of May 07 Boards if you forward your email address to me via Seabreeze (click on 'email' link above).


To bd123,

Maybe give Marco at Auswind a call on 92444446 to answer question (Severne and Powerex importers). I would have thought that if the 5.0 S-1 has an adjustable head and you used a 430 RDM mast then you would only have 9cm of mast sticking out the top, which I personally wouldn't worry about!

I currently use a NP X6 430 bottom with a NP X6 400 top in an 05 NP 4.7 Combat (409 luff) and it appears to work well, though NP chose not to put adjustable heads on the smaller 05 Combats for some strange reason!
dism
dism
NSW
660 posts
NSW, 660 posts
8 Aug 2008 6:07pm
GazMan said...
NP chose not to put adjustable heads on the smaller 05 Combats for some strange reason!


Because they are profiteering nazis?
GazMan
GazMan
WA
848 posts
WA, 848 posts
8 Aug 2008 5:29pm
dism said...

GazMan said...
NP chose not to put adjustable heads on the smaller 05 Combats for some strange reason!


Because they are profiteering nazis?


Yeah dism, pretty much what I thought too, though you're obviously more upfront about the issue than me! (some of the best performing sails I've owned in 25 years of windsurfing have been NP's so I wasn't keen to bag them publicly). Surely another reason why I'm seriously considering switching from NP to Severne, also because of more 'local' content (WA bred designer).

dism
dism
NSW
660 posts
NSW, 660 posts
8 Aug 2008 7:45pm
Yeah Gazman, i'm new to the game, but from what i've seen so far brands like NP pricing new/young windsurfers like myself (i've been on the planet for less time then you've been windsurfing) off their gear (via individual pricing and brand incompatability) is the main issue in the viability of this sport.

Yeah, i'm calling a spade a spade!

I don't doubt that they are one of the best performance wise, but they lack a bit in other areas. Surely the biggest companies could play smart and boost the comsumer base by having better priced sails?

Look at KA sails too Gazman, they are Aussie made (Severne is sadly owned by Starboard but at least an Aussie has main? input), meanwhile i'll stick with loft/gun at least whilst i'm temporarily poor (they are pretty good kit, just haven't got the name to put a big pricetag on I think, shame not Aussie but)

Stupollard - What you end up going with?

The Grinch
The Grinch
WA
733 posts
WA, 733 posts
8 Aug 2008 5:53pm

As my wife said to me.

"$700 for a stick?"
dism
dism
NSW
660 posts
NSW, 660 posts
8 Aug 2008 8:01pm
Did you tell her it's got NASA technology in it?

And you'd probably use it more then her dresses (count up enough dresses to equal the mast then compare usage)!

^probably the reason I get in the bad books with the missus, using that thinking
GazMan
GazMan
WA
848 posts
WA, 848 posts
9 Aug 2008 5:12pm
dism said...

Yeah Gazman, i'm new to the game, but from what i've seen so far brands like NP pricing new/young windsurfers like myself (i've been on the planet for less time then you've been windsurfing) off their gear (via individual pricing and brand incompatability) is the main issue in the viability of this sport.



Still an issue for 'old-timers' like me as well, I don't have a lot of disposable income to spend on either new or used gear (unlike many 'cashed up' folks in resource rich WA) so value for money is also one of my priorities. As well as this, I don't want to go down the road of forking out hard-earned cash on another new sail without demo-ing before buying based solely on so-called 'brand reliablility' and past performance of NP sails (as I did with my 06 NP 5.4 Excess which has been something of a disappointment).


dism said...
Look at KA sails too Gazman, they are Aussie made



Didn't really give KA a thought, though I might now that you mention it. I met the head designer of KA, Andrew McDougall, back in the eighties when I lived in Victoria in the days when he built Wild Winds sails (used his sails for many years with great results).
dism
dism
NSW
660 posts
NSW, 660 posts
9 Aug 2008 9:13pm
Well meeting the designer is alot better then just buying sails from Hong Kong I reckon!

KA's sails look pretty schmick too
bd123
bd123
WA
46 posts
WA, 46 posts
11 Aug 2008 4:32pm
To GazMan:

I would have thought that if the 5.0 S-1 has an adjustable head and you used a 430 RDM mast then you would only have 9cm of mast sticking out the top, which I personally wouldn't worry about!

Yes, that would have been good and is what I normally do with my Rocks, but both the S-1 5.0 and 5.9 have fixed heads.
Thanks for Marco's number. I'll see what he suggests.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply