FarNorthSurfer said..patronus said..FarNorthSurfer said..
Sadly as the price I have been quoted in the UK is much the same as a decent new SUP foil board or a complete foil from another brand for just the mast I can't justify the cost. Which is a shame as I have a decent quiver of A+ kit.
How much is it in UK?
I was quoted ?1695 from the shop I purchased all my other Armstrong foil gear and an FG board a while back. He didn't say it was a deal for me, I think that's UK retail.
Anyway it's too much for me (retired guy, for fun not racing or competing).
I understand it is similar pricing to the Axis Hi Mod mast but it's considerably more than the A+ series masts. It is also about the same price as buying a complete foil from AFS or SABFoil which both have decent reviews.
As an engineer I understand that technology evolves, however if the new mast profile is a large part of the design how about a cheaper version with improved hydrodynamics and lower quality carbon?
My 935 was 1550 USD. I'm just an intermediate winger--definitely not pushing anything to the extent of high-performance. The new mast is so much more than just being stiffer--everything is direct. It responds incredibly well to user input on all axes. I love it.
Armstrong is a small, specialized company, which should suggest that the unit product cost, inclusive of R&D, marketing, overhead, profit, insurance, and so on, has to be reasonably high. That being so, I think companies like Armstrong, over the course of just a few years, have realized that there is sufficient market demand to justify the cost of gear like high-mod masts and alternative-material wings. It's unfortunate but probably inevitable.
The same thing applies to cars, phones, or whatever else gets loads of people fizzing. Things like power-steering and sat nav were initially exclusive to high-end cars. The first smartphones were incredibly expensive relative to other phones. The latest and greatest get the best new features--as well as generally becoming more expensive--and the mass-market alternatives get some of the older features. The downstream effect may be applicable to the foiling industry provided that there is sustained mass-market demand, which could eventually result in lowered material, production, and manufacturing costs.