I'm staggered at the responses to this topic. From the inadequacies of the pfd laws to blaming the volunteers and the rescue vessel. Ffs look at the facts Mr Clayton had no education in seamanship and was moved on by the authorities Full stop.
A very good point, though extremely expensive and highly unlikely. A requirement to boat ownership like having a license would be a deterrent to some, would also ensure boat operators knew the basic rules like what side to pass on, who has right of way etc. how can that be a bad thing ?
You may remember this couple who escaped with their lives just 2years ago, also putting to sea in an unseaworthy vessel after being ordered to move on. There's a pattern developing here, what do you think should be done ?
Indeed. There's two issues at play here, one a lack of education, I've been an advocate for even something as simple as the general boating license for any vessel with a motor, this would at least introduce concepts of good seamanship. The second is the way nsw laws are designed to benefit a few but affect all. You may remember a campaign nsw sailor had about an anchor law amendment. It's a bit like homelessness folk getting moved on to the next shire, except there's less chance of a tragedy it the scale we are discussing
Salty thanks for the update. Unfortunately the circumstances that are coming to light are not painting the authorities policies favourably.For the record I like our local blokes but it's the higher ranks that call the shots. Boating safety officers being directed to move unseaworthy vessels on... if the axe does fall I bet it won't be in pit street.
