Carantoc said..

Hey, Bono (oh bollocks, sorry dude, the old finger typing habits die hard))

Hey Meh -

You appear to be making an argument that in your opinion AI's (or the current version of AI) fundamental flaw is that it will inevitably descend into an endless feed-back loop of relying on it's own opinion to re-form it's own opinion, eventually spiraling into sprouting complete nonsense and madness .

......And to clarify your opinion on this you quoted your own previous opinion !

I don't seek to disagree with the feed-back loop proposition as a hypothesis - I just found it amusing you seemed to be relying on one thing to make an argument against the thing your are relying on to make it. I mean - when AI, or indeed any of us, try to project something as new and different, but it simply comprises the same old re-hashed content from the past it might appear new and exciting to others for a while, but eventually I think the collective will notice and realise worship of this new reincarnation is nothing more than a celebration of the emperor's new clothes.

eh ?

Carantoc said..

Hey, Bono (oh bollocks, sorry dude, the old finger typing habits die hard))

Hey Meh -

cammd said..


At least 1000 posts and 10 years to be considered a respected veteran.

To be iconic you need to do it without being suspended or banned.

Carantoc said..
You can't make this ****e up. Do your own research people, do your own research.

cammd said..
Aaaaah..... you forgot to mention iconic.

I think Carantoc is onto something, the logic seems solid and maths doesn't lie.