jamdfingr said...
Mr float, I'm sorry that you feel that way. I have disagreed with many of the decisions the labour government have made even back to good ol Kevin. The fact that she is a woman has nothing to do with my opinion of her.
Yes she gets a verbal bashing but I think that is because people lost respect for her through her actions as pm and the distrust that we have seen from the public of their leaders.
Labour has only governed us through a recession because of the hard and unpopular decisions made by the liberal government. Yes Johnny was a cunning little bugger, but you have to respect his ability as a politician. And it really got to me when they gave Wayne swan the best treasurer in the world award. He got that for australias position through the recession which basically was built on the work of Peter Costello! I would be ashamed if I was him to have that sitting on my mantle.
I'm regards to jooliar, I think she has set back women in the PM seat for years to come which is really sad as I would have liked to see another female prime minister as they seem to be able to make the hard and unpopular decisions which sometimes a country needs (read margret thatcher for that one.... )
Unfortunately, because of Jooliar, some of the older generation and people who are sexist, will put her inability to govern down to the fact she is a woman which is not fair.
Basically she is a pawn and the very definition of a pink shirt: someone who was put in place after they killed off the old leader and whom is different and people wont have a go at her because they will be dazzled by the gimmick of our first female PM!
I do believe that she has done the best she can but I don't believe that she is right for the job because of her inabilities as a leader.
I just don't think your right about the "pawn" Idea. Gillard was a shining star in the Labour opposition and an absolute star in Parliament in Government as deputy. She wasn't "put in place", she deserved the opportunity. No Gimmick, she was clearly the best candidate.
And "her inability to govern". I don't get that either. This has been THE most productive government I can remember for a long time . Even considering the difficult status of the independents and the numbers in the opposition, the amount of legislation that has been passed through both houses has been excellent. There have been some ground breaking and far reaching policies implemented including the disability insurance scheme ,the reforms to the aged care area, the withdrawal plans for Afgahnistan, the dental scheme, carbon pricing etc etc.
Now Weather you agree with those policies is one thing but as a matter of fact you can't say, "failure to govern"