Super, again.

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
28 May 2012 11:12am
I'd continue my previous whinge here (www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/General-Discussion/Chat/Super-negative-annuation/) but it's pasted its reply by date.

Here's my latest... I have a super account which is 100% cash, guess how much money it lost for the year?

$1100... when did cash go down in value... when did we get negative interest rates? WTF did I mis?

$260 of that was
Basic TPD
Voluntary TPD
Asset Fee
Administration Fee
Inv Choice Fee
Contributions Tax

It's an industry super... fark it's REST.

I told them, written to them, faxed forms to the retards there, that I don't want ANY insurance... do they understand? NO

How much has my other Super lost this year? OnePath (www.onepath.com.au/home.aspx), One Path to farking ruin. It's lost 13%.

How did my personal investments do? + 8% and most of it is CASH!
Yeah I know manage your own super.

Do yourself a favour and have a look at how your being ripped.
GPA
GPA
WA
2529 posts
GPA GPA
WA, 2529 posts
28 May 2012 9:32am
Hmmm...

I have a very good employer super scheme - but I am about to change employer and that will stop. I have put most of my extra income into paying off the mortgage and will have it done within 2yrs at age 47yo. Even as a young bloke I quickly worked out that Super was subject to the ever changing tax policies of the then government....

I reckon once I get the mortgage squared away any extra income will go into cash term deposits. * I need to do a lot more homework on tax benefits of salary sacraficing....
kk
kk
WA
953 posts
kk kk
WA, 953 posts
28 May 2012 9:07pm
I don't trust super because it is controlled by goverment rules and regs that they change at will. I don't trust either side of goverment and the greens even less, besides the whole show is run by beurocrats that multiply like bacteria on a good growth medium (our taxes)

Hence I have never put anymore than absolutely required into the goverments piggy bank they have been eying off for some time now.

And I too had quite a hard time convincing Australian Super that I didn't want their life insurance scam, it should be a opt in scheme, not a try to get out of situation after they decide for you... rant ... rannt rant
adolf
adolf
1862 posts
1862 posts
28 May 2012 9:48pm
On a similar note I caught a bit of a news story tonight about people investing in artwork for their self managed super.

The government has apparently ruled that unless the artwork is stored away in professional storage, the artwork cannot be considered as a valid super investment.

Obviously the art world is upset by this and one collector spooked by the thought of not being able to see his collection has put the lot up for auction.

www.superguide.com.au/smsfs/smsf-investment-art-collectors-subject-to-stricter-guidelines
myusernam
myusernam
QLD
6158 posts
QLD, 6158 posts
29 May 2012 5:44am
i dont know how people sleep putting their super into art! (collegue was talking about buying paintings) screw that.
Although I do like those posters of dogs playing pool....
BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
29 May 2012 4:22am
Government Worker Super Funds don't seem to take any hits - funny that
Gwendy
Gwendy
SA
472 posts
SA, 472 posts
29 May 2012 8:48am
kk said...

I don't trust super because it is controlled by goverment rules and regs that they change at will. I don't trust either side of goverment and the greens even less, besides the whole show is run by beurocrats that multiply like bacteria on a good growth medium (our taxes)

Hence I have never put anymore than absolutely required into the goverments piggy bank they have been eying off for some time now.

And I too had quite a hard time convincing Australian Super that I didn't want their life insurance scam, it should be a opt in scheme, not a try to get out of situation after they decide for you... rant ... rannt rant


True that
Stanos
Stanos
QLD
87 posts
QLD, 87 posts
29 May 2012 11:10pm
I've been self managed the past 12 months and now look at super in a new light. You control it, you own it, you manage expenses, you make your own investment decisions and it's not that hard to beat those fee sucking mega funds. Of course there's paper work and it takes some time to set up and manage but I reckon it's worth the effort.
kk
kk
WA
953 posts
kk kk
WA, 953 posts
29 May 2012 11:58pm
Stanos said...

I've been self managed the past 12 months and now look at super in a new light. You control it, you own it, you manage expenses, you make your own investment decisions and it's not that hard to beat those fee sucking mega funds. Of course there's paper work and it takes some time to set up and manage but I reckon it's worth the effort.



Yep been there done that, still doing to some extent. Just don't do it with your to be ex wife like I did. But if things don't head that way it is the best option IF you earn enough to cover the annual fees of having an extra trust and company, and the accountacy fees that go with it. Those fees alone add up to more than the average industry funds fees, but you do get to choose your own destiny more.

My gripe is more with the moving goal posts. My accountant recently tried to talk me into moving some investment property into super to "save me thousands" I pointed out that I am now already semi retired at 49 and kinda liked it that way. He said if I moved my investments into super I would not be benefit from the funds untill I turned 57, even then to a limited extent. Obviously no changes were made, remember accountants make heaps out of self managed super funds.

But the real hook is that the goverment of the day can change that age if they want people to stay in the workforce longer.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15101 posts
WA, 15101 posts
30 May 2012 9:29am
adolf said...

On a similar note I caught a bit of a news story tonight about people investing in artwork for their self managed super.

The government has apparently ruled that unless the artwork is stored away in professional storage, the artwork cannot be considered as a valid super investment.

Obviously the art world is upset by this and one collector spooked by the thought of not being able to see his collection has put the lot up for auction.

www.superguide.com.au/smsfs/smsf-investment-art-collectors-subject-to-stricter-guidelines


It sort of makes sense to rule this way.

If they didn't I would be tempted to "invest" my super contributions with a few "appreciating assets" from a factory in Thailand and some other assets produced in Sri Lanka
choco
choco
SA
4186 posts
SA, 4186 posts
30 May 2012 11:21am
myusernam said...

i dont know how people sleep putting their super into art! (collegue was talking about buying paintings) screw that.
Although I do like those posters of dogs playing pool....


I don't know how people sleep relying on having money in their super account on retirement.
Subsonic
Subsonic
WA
3415 posts
WA, 3415 posts
31 May 2012 9:11pm
I think if the government were serious about people having money on retirement they'd allow super contributions to be deposited in some sort of locked account that you can't access till retirement age or if something happens.

Remove the cornered market that allows the big profit super companies to exist. and let people benefit from the full spoils of their working life. Stop feeding an un-necessary industry.

FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
1 Jun 2012 1:17pm
OK after speaking with REST over several hours, we've gone through all the details and the reason I lost.

It basically boils down to an asset allocation change.

I moved away from a diversified portfolio to Cash/Bonds... so while the FYTD of the diversified portfolio is 0.2%, me with my good luck moved it when it was -4.5% (the LOWEST point since!) that is what screwed me.

Putting it in cash/bonds made me recover most of the loss, or I could have just left it and made 2%

For those interested unit price history by week is here: rest.com.au/member/investments/super-options
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
1 Jun 2012 12:33pm
Heard the other day, you can access part of your super if unemployed for period of 13 weeks or more.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
1 Jun 2012 9:46pm
My superannuation plan is a loaded pistol. Medical advances and super sound too much like Tithonus to me. [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tithonus]

Like seriously people, have you done the maths? You'll need millions.

Here's a pretty picture:
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply