Mark _australia said...
I think the main IRONY here is:
(1) you claim all the cyclists injuries that cause death etc are internal organs.
Maybe because helmets became mandatory 15 or 20yrs ago?
Care to post stats of injury rates before and after the laws came in? I dunno what they are but I reckon you'd be surprised. Go on, do it.
(2) you also claim you were going to fail to stop for a cop flagging you down at an RBT and it could have killed you.
Well, he gave u a lawful requirement to stop.
Whether or not YOU think people ride p!ssed at 9am is up to u, but guess what, some do.
Now for IRONY fkn central - what are you wearing in your avatar pic.....?
If you are genuinely interested in casualty stats in regards to bicycles
http://helmetfreedom.org/http://helmetfreedom.org/page/2/
If you take the time to peruse the above, You will see that if you take the loss of bussiness that bicycle retailers suffered after the legislations introduction into account, there is a very strong argument to suggest that the injury rate actually
increased.
The reasons for this are complex. There's a lot more to it that thinking Oh, a little peice of styrene on the heads got to be good right?
For me its not about whether or not its a good idea to use one, Its about being forced to. If you can get prosecuted for riding through a park at running speed with no helmet then it is quite simply not a free country.
In fact, we are one of the only countries where this can happen.
I've seen people on here whinging about PFD laws for kite and sailboarders and supporting helmet laws. Well you can't have it both ways.