quote:
[i]Originally posted by waveslave
Maybe I'm missing something ?
The philosophy may be purposely concealed.
Maybe the amber box is absent.
That cautionary beacon that warns all of us about control-freaks.
The flashing orange light keeps reverberating in my brain.
Flash, flash, flash.
'Control-freak' WARNING !
Actually,
It's starting to give me a splitting headache.
My mind is a mushburger.
There is something very sinister about these thumb-votes....
but I can't quite put my finger on it ??
I'm told it's about having fun and winning prizes.....
and the rating of goodness versus badness.
Are we rating the goodness of the post....
or the badness of its author ??
Or both ?
Or neither ?
Or visa-versa ?
What ?
Which ?
Or is it about forum self-regulation ?
The need for more staff-cuts on seabreeze.com.au maybe ?
Users killing off other rival forum users.
< Folks, the moderator just left the buiding.>
Executions are now done by the people for the people....
the Site washs its bloody hands of this dirty, thankless task.
Lynch-mob mentality fuels the witch-hunt.
Or is it about the threat of internet litigation ?
Kite**** slandering kite-pimps.
Axe-grinders bashing integrous shop-guys.
Lawyers stalking forum-prey while licking their chops with glee.
But the forum nazis can now thumb their noses at flunky lawsuits and plead 'no-liability', man.
"The users are a pack of wild dogs. They govern themselves and eat their young."
hahaah
The forum moderator sleeps peacefully at night.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
