quote:
Originally posted by bondo
except I never actually said any of those things -
<snip>
But hey, you've read the weather makers and watched Big-Als movie, so I guess they are the final conclusive words on the topic.
Except I never said that I'd read the book or seen the movie, I said proof had been offered in them. I've read other articles (not yet any whole books) and seen a lot of documentaries about it and am not entirely uninformed, but that's not the point I'm trying to make. And I would disagree that I'm a typical global warming fanatic, what I'm trying to push here is that those people who insist on ignoring that there could be a problem reconsider and accept that there
could be a problem. I accept that there may not be a problem too.
Perhaps a better way to put what I'm trying to get at is that since there is an argument that there is global warming, and there is an argument that it's a load of malarky, we should all consider both sides of the argument rather than ignore the inconvenient one. And if riding my bicycle to work has the added benefit of not burning expensive fuel and not producing carbon emissions as well as helping me shed kilograms then why not say it's good for the environment. Of course I alone can't make a difference doing this, but what if everyone who possibly could rode a bicycle to work? It might even make a difference, no matter how slight. It might just stop the temperature short of going over the seabreeze cancellation upper limit one day, and that day might just happen to be one of the best days kiting in someones life...
