And now for something completely different... Bruce McKee boards

2 months ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
MobZ
MobZ
NSW
579 posts
NSW, 579 posts
26 Sep 2026 9:52pm
Chris 249 said..

If we do some research about the physics of planing hulls, then we see that they’ve been well and truly explained since before David Savitsky did his work. We then know that the physics of planing hulls show that a short, wide area of contact with the water is more efficient in terms of lift for drag, because drag drops by the square as width increases. We can see pretty easily that even if the board was only planing on the tiny patches at the back of each “sponson”, then in just about any chop the waves will be hitting the “tunnel” which will increase wetted surface friction.




I've done 700 kilometres of research on these McKee boards since he brought them July 11. Just sailing like I normally do. Mostly Hydro 155ltr comparing it to my other light wind board JP SLW 165ltr.
In light wind slop chop going 15-20kts I feel it might be riding on the sponsons and tunnel is clear. The nose can hit hard like other boards do but this happens rarely, as I feel the ability to steer it better than other boards, Thus avoiding nose hits, and giving a smooth sensation.
I think I can probably go faster on the Hyrdo than I can on SLW. I know for certain that I can gybe Hyrdo much better than SLW. Hyrdo is 75 wide vs SLW 92 wide. So maybe not the fairest test as they are quite different boards but it's what I've got to compare.

I've noticed Hyrdo planing below 13kts, perhaps as low as 11. That is early compared to my other boards.

Much more sailing distance is needed to say anything for sure.

Great work WA Jim. Not easy bringing things together for a video edit, you've smashed it mate.
And thanks for the tips Antman, I focused on tail pressure around the gybe and it helps

This vid is Hydro with 6.5 and 40cm carbon

choco
choco
SA
4198 posts
SA, 4198 posts
27 Sep 2026 8:23am
Chris 249 said..
The shape of most boards changed dramatically with wide style boards, which use the simple physical fact that a short and wide planing surface is far more efficient at planing speed.

The idea that the gap between the two “planing” surfaces won’t get in contact with the water seems to be very dubious in any chop.

These boards goes away from that. The style, incidentally, was tried about 1981.


What were those boards built from back in 81?
MobZ
MobZ
NSW
579 posts
NSW, 579 posts
27 Sep 2026 11:29am
* HYDRO! I can spell, the computer can't 🤔
Hydrosurf
Hydrosurf
295 posts
295 posts
27 Sep 2026 10:02am
Spelling is overrated 😎
kato
kato
VIC
3541 posts
VIC, 3541 posts
27 Sep 2026 12:49pm
choco said..

Chris 249 said..
The shape of most boards changed dramatically with wide style boards, which use the simple physical fact that a short and wide planing surface is far more efficient at planing speed.

The idea that the gap between the two “planing” surfaces won’t get in contact with the water seems to be very dubious in any chop.

These boards goes away from that. The style, incidentally, was tried about 1981.



What were those boards built from back in 81?


I’ve got one from the late 90 early 2000. Tried it at LG…. I’ll bring it and you can have a play
Chris 249
Chris 249
NSW
3609 posts
NSW, 3609 posts
2 Oct 2026 7:07pm
choco said..

Chris 249 said..
The shape of most boards changed dramatically with wide style boards, which use the simple physical fact that a short and wide planing surface is far more efficient at planing speed.

The idea that the gap between the two “planing” surfaces won’t get in contact with the water seems to be very dubious in any chop.

These boards goes away from that. The style, incidentally, was tried about 1981.



What were those boards built from back in 81?


Probably just polyester and foam.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply