joller said..patronus said..happysam said..patronus said..jaume said..
Glide 2.0 Dlab and SLS, Also new Dlab Masts Slim 2.0 with monoblock head, sizes 76 84 and 94
The downwind wing on the Maui pic is the new Hyperglide Dlab
Any news on why change mast lengths and their intended uses?Winging and before changing to Duotone 90 mast I used another brand's 85 which due to different ways of measuring was only 3-4 cm shorter. I found the Duotone more 'detached' and less responsive, I guess as a bit longer so think 94 will be even worse, on the other hand in big chop I bounce off and survive and feel with 84 I'ld smash to a standstill.
Using the 90cm myself and it flexes a bit too much in my opinion. But the new d lab masts have changed how they lay up the carbon fibers which should add torsional strength.
The improved torsional strength is interesting but still unsure if 84 will be too short and hit chop, and 94 too long and unresponsive.
I ride the 90 dlab mast in chop and small waves and have the same concern. The 90 is great for chop.
The 94 seems too long and has a wider chord so not as good at turning. The 84 may be too short and hit the chop.
I've ridden another brands 80 and it hit the chop. Has Duotone tested the 84 mast in chop?
The new 94cm mast has a chord length of 118mm at the bottom, where it is the thinnest (13.5mm).
That chord then tapers gently to 132mm 15cm from the top of the plate. It is then 15.2mm thick at this point.
The average chord length over that section of the mast is thus 125mm which is exactly what the previous generation dlab mast was.
The average thickness is 14.4mm, which is substantially less than the 16.8mm thickness from the previous generation.
Every rider I have had on the new 94cm mast, which previously rode the 90cm dlab mast, commented straightaway about the better turning and better feel in general of the new mast.
I suggest you try find a demo somewhere to make your own judgement.
Regards,
Jerome